A Real-Life Based Evaluation Method of Deployable Vulnerable Road User Protection Systems

References

• Akiyama A, Okamoto M, Ito O, Takahashi Y. Verification of thoracic response of the Polar-II pedestrian dummy. Paper presented at: 2008 International Crashworthiness Conference; 2008; Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama A, Okamoto M, Rangarajan N. Development and application of the new pedestrian dummy. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference of Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama A, Yoshida S, Matsuhashi T, et al. Development of Human-like Pedestrian Dummy. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Society of Automotive Engineers; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO). CARE database—Traffic safety basic facts 2012. 2012. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/care_reports_graphics/index_en.htm. Accessed March 16, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Bylund P-O, Öman M. Fatal vehicle-to-bicyclist crashes in Sweden—an in-depth study of injuries and vehicle sources. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Rosén E. Integrated pedestrian countermeasures—potential of head injury reduction combining passive and active countermeasures. Saf Sci. 2012a;50:400–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Rosén E. Priorities for bicyclist protection in car impacts—a real life study of severe injuries and car sources. Paper presented at: IRCOBI (International Research Council On the Biomechanics of Impact) Conference; 2012b; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Rosén E, Kullgren A. Priorities of pedestrian protection—a real-life study of severe injuries and car sources. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1672–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Recommended Procedures for Evaluating Occupant Injury Risk From Deploying Side Airbags. The Side Airbag Out-of-Position Injury Technical Working Group (A joint project of Alliance, AIAM, AORC, and IIHS); Arlington, VA: IIHS; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Longhitano D, Henary B, Bhalla K, Ivarsson J, Crandall J. Influence of vehicle body type on pedestrian injury distribution. Paper presented at: Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress; 2005; Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Maki T, Kajzer J, Mizuno K, Sekine Y. Comparative analysis of vehicle–bicyclist and vehicle–pedestrian accidents in Japan. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:927–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallory A, Fredriksson R, Rosen E, Donnelly B. Pedestrian injuries by source: serious and disabling injuries in US and European cases. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:13–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naci H, Chisholm D, Baker TD. Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison. Inj Prev. 2009;15(1):55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Final Economic Assessment, FMVSS No. 201, Upper Interior Head Protection. Washington, DC: Author; 1995. Docket No. NHTSA-1996–1762 item ID-0003.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. FMVSS Standard No. 208; Occupant Crash Protection. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Statens Institut för Kommunikationsanalys. Road Traffic Injuries 2008. Östersund, Sweden: Author; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Strandroth J, Rizzi M, Sternlund S, Lie A, Tingvall C. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12:604–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann-Linden J. Bicycle Use Trends in Germany. Berlin, Germany: German Institute of Urban Affairs (Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Regulation No. 94, Revision 2, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. 2013. . E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.93/Rev.2−E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.93/Rev.2
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Regulation No. 95, Revision 2, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision. Author; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van Schijndel M, de Hair S, Rodarius C, Fredriksson R. Cyclist kinematics in car impacts reconstructed in simulations and full scale testing with Polar dummy. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact Conference; 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar