The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints

References

• Andersson M, Bohman K, Osvalder A-L. Effect of booster seat design on children's choice of seating positions during naturalistic riding. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:171–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Locey CM, Zonfrillo MR, Maltese MR. Protection of children restrained in child safety seats in side impact crashes. J Trauma. 2010;69:913–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman K, Andersson M, Osvalder A-L. A comparison of children's sitting postures during drive and the HIII 6y seating position—in two different high back booster seats. Paper presented at: International Conference on Protection of Children in Cars; December 2010; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bowtell W, Lumley MA. Safety seat tether strap. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; 1997. U.S. Patent No. 5,630,645.
   Google Scholar
• Britax. 2014. Britax Product Knowledge Center. Available at: http://www.britaxusa.com/learning-center/360-degree-protection/energy-absorbing-versa-tether. Accessed September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Griffiths M, Paine M. Effectiveness of child restraints: the Australian experience. In: Australian New Car Assessment (ANCAP). 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Kelly P, Griffiths M. A Comparison of Alternative Anchorage Systems for Child Restraints in Side Impacts. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1997. SAE Technical Paper. No. 973303.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton JL, Fildes B, Laemmle R, Smith S, Douglas F. A preliminary evaluation of child restraints and anchorage systems for an Australian car. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2004;48:73–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charlton JL, Fildes B, Taranto D, et al. Performance of booster seats in side impacts: effect of adjacent passengers and ISOFIX attachment. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:155–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). Assessment Protocol—Child Occupant Protection. Ver 6.5.1. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ghati Y, Menon RA, Milone M, Lankarani H, Oliveres G. Performance evaluation of child safety seats in far-side lateral sled tests at varying speeds. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild HW, Humm JR, Yoganandan N. Injury potential at center rear seating positions in rear-facing child restraint systems in side impacts. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2013;57:281–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huntley M. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 Child Restraint Systems. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Ritchie NL, Manary MA, Reed MP, Tamborra N, Schneider LW. Kinematics of the Q3S ATD in a child restraint under far-side impact loading. In: Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Langwieder K, Hummel T. Biomechanical risk factors for children in cars and aggravation by misuse of restraint systems. Paper presented at: 14th International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); May 1994; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese MR, Locey CM, Jermakian JS, Nance ML, Arbogast KB. Injury causation scenarios in belt-restrained nearside child occupants. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:299–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCray L, Scarboro M, Brewer J. Injuries to children one to three years old in side impact crashes. Paper presented at: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2007; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. NHTSA Vehicle Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2011–2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2011. Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0108.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Laboratory Test Procedure for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 213 Child Restraint Systems. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2014a.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Notice of Proposed Rule Making. 49CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems—Side Impact Protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2014b. Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Orzechowski KM, Edgerton EA, Bulas DI, McLaughlin PM, Eichelberger MR. Patterns of injury to restrained children in side impact motor vehicle crashes: the side impact syndrome. J Trauma. 2003;54:1094–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood CP, Ferguson SA, Crandall JR. Factors leading to crash fatalities to children in child restraints. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:343–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE J211-1 Instrumentation for Impact Test, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. Warrendale, PA: SAE International; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE. NHTSA's initial evaluation of child side impact test procedures. In: Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Stuttgart, Germany: NHTSA; 2009. Paper 09-0539.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE, Echemendia CG. NHTSA’S Evaluation of a Potential Child Side Impact Test Procedure. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2011. Paper Number 11-0227.
   Google Scholar
• Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K, McFadden J. Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 2013;57:243–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winston FK, Chen IG, Smith R, Elliott MR. Parent driver characteristics associated with sub-optimal restraint of child passengers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7:373–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar