References
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. Washington, DC: AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures; 2009.
- Federal Highway Administration. Peer Review of Report: Relative Comparison of NCHRP 350 Accepted Guardrail End Terminals. 2015. . Available at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/guardrailsafety/peerreview.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2105.
- Gabler HC, Weaver AA, Stitzel JD. Automotive Field Data in Injury Biomechanics. In: Yoganandan N, et al., eds. Accidental Injury. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2015:33–49.
- Gattis JL, Varghese JP, Toothaker LE. Analysis of guardrail-end accidents in Oklahoma. Transp Res Rec. 1993;1419:52–56.
- Hunter WW, Stewart R, Council F. Comparative performance of barrier and end treatment types using the longitudinal barrier special study file. Transp Res Rec. 1993;1419:63–77.
- Nadeau GG. ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal; Request for Information. 2014. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-30081. Accessed March 15, 2015.
- NHTSA. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) Crashworthiness Data System Analytical User's Manual. Washington, DC: Author; 2009. Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/NASS08.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2015.
- Ray MH, Weir J, Hopp J. In-Service Performance of Traffic Barriers. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2003. National Cooperative Highway Research Council Report 490.
- Ross HE, Sicking DL, Zimmer RA, Mitchie JD. Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 1993. National Cooperative Highway Research Council Report 350.
- Viano DC, Parenteau CS. Belt use: comparison of NASS-CDS and police crash reports. Traffic Inj Prev. 2009;10:427–435.
- Viner JG, Council FM, Stewart JR. Frequency and severity of crashes involving roadside safety hardware by vehicle type. Transp Res Rec. 1994;1468:10–18.