Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system

References

• Abdel-Aty M, Dilmore J, Dhindsa A. Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:335–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty M, Pande A, Lee C, Gayah V, Santos CD. Crash risk assessment using intelligent transportation systems data and real-time intervention strategies to improve safety on freeways. J Intell Transp Syst. 2007;11(3):107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaby P, Hellinga B, Bullock M. Variable speed limits: safety and operational impacts of a candidate control strategy for freeway applications. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2007;8:671–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose A, Ioannou P. Mixed manual/semi-automated traffic: a macroscopic analysis. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2003;11:439–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chira-Chavala T, Yoo S. Potential safety benefits of intelligent cruise control systems. Accid Anal Prev. 1994;26(2):135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah H, Koutsopoulos HN, Saifuzzaman M, Kölbl R, Fuchs S, Bankosegger D. Evaluation of the effect of cooperative infrastructure-to-vehicle systems on driver behavior. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2012;21:42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward JC. Near-miss determination through use of a scale of danger. Highway Research Record. 1972;384:24–34.
   Google Scholar
• Horiguchi R, Oguchi T. A study on car following models simulating various adaptive cruise control behaviors. Int J Intell Trans Syst Res. 2014;12(3):127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez F, Naranjo JE, García F. An improved method to calculate the time-to-collision of two vehicles. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res. 2013;11:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kesting A, Treiber M, Helbing D. Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 2010;368:4585–4605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesting A, Treiber M, Schönhof M, Helbing D. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2008;16:668–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesting A, Treiber M, Schönhof M, Kranke F, Helbing D. Jam-avoiding adaptive cruise control (ACC) and its impact on traffic dynamics. In: Traffic and Granular Flow’05. Springer; 2007:633–643.
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi S, Uno N, Tanaka M. Impacts of shorter perception–reaction time of adapted cruise controlled vehicles on traffic flow and safety. J Transp Eng. 2003;129(2):146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsialos A, Papageorgiou M, Mangeas M, Haj-Salem H. Coordinated and integrated control of motorway networks via non-linear optimal control. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2002;10:65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Hellinga B, Saccomanno F. Evaluation of variable speed limits to improve traffic safety. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2006;14(3):213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Li Y, Liu P, Wang W, Xu C. Development of a variable speed limit strategy to reduce secondary collision risks during inclement weathers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;72:134–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu P, Wang W, Xu C. Development of a control strategy of variable speed limits to reduce rear-end collision risks near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15:866–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden G, McDonald M, Brackstone M. Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2001;9:33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanés V, Shladover SE. Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2014;48:285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanés V, Shladover SE, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M. Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15: 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minderhoud MM, Bovy PH. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33:89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou M, Hadj-Salem H, Middelham F. ALINEA local ramp metering: summary of field results. Transp Res Rec. 1997;1603:90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ploeg J, Semsar-Kazerooni E, Lijster G, van de Wouw N, Nijmeijer H. Graceful degradation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2015;16:488–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover SE, Nowakowski C, Lu XY, et al. Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) definitions and operating concepts. Paper presented at: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan B, Brackstone M, McDonald M eds. Parameter analysis for collision avoidance systems. Paper presented at: 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson O, Eriksson G, Gonzalez N. Braking from different speeds: judgments of collision speed if a car does not stop in time. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45:487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapani A.. Vehicle trajectory effects of adaptive cruise control. J Intell Transp Syst. 2012;16:36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst R and Hogema J. Time to collision and collision avoidance systems. In: Proceedings 6th ICTCT workshop Salzburg. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• van Nunen E, Kwakkernaat R, Ploeg J, Netten BD. Cooperative competition for future mobility. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2012;13:1018–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varaiya P.. Smart cars on smart roads: problems of control. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1993;38(2):195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Recker W. Simulation studies of information propagation in a self-organizing distributed traffic information system. Transp Res C Emerg Technol. 2005;13:370–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi S, Mousavi MS, Fathy M. Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): challenges and perspectives. Paper presented at: 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications; 2006.
   Google Scholar