Can progress in reducing alcohol-impaired driving fatalities be resumed? Results of a workshop sponsored by the Transportation Research Board, Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Transportation Committee (ANB50)

References

• Babor TF, McRee BG, Kassebaum PA, Grimaldi PL, Ahmed K, Bray J. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abuse. 2007;28(3):7–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartl G, Esberger R. Effects of lowering the legal BAC limit in Austria. In: Laurell H, Schlyter F, eds. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety–T'2000; May 22–26, 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (ICADTS); 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Beirness DJ, Beasley EE. An evaluation of immediate roadside prohibitions for drinking drivers in British Columbia: findings from roadside surveys. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirness DJ, Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. The impact of mandatory versus voluntary participation in the Alberta Ignition Interlock Program. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003;4:24–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertholet N, Daeppen J-B, Wietlisbach V, Fleming M, Burnand B. Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:986–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais E, Bellavance F, Marcil A, Carnis L. Effects of introducing an administrative. 05% blood alcohol concentration limit on law enforcement patterns and alcohol-related collisions in Canada. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;82:101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg RD, Peck RC, Moskowitz H, Burns M, Fiorentino D. Crash Risk of Alcohol Involved Driving: A Case–Control Study. Stamford, CT: Dunlap & Associates, Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks C, Zaal D. Effects of a 0.05 Alcohol Limit in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra, Australia: Federal Office of Road Safety; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Brubacher JR, Chan H, Brasher P, et al. Reduction in fatalities, ambulance calls, and hospital admissions for road trauma after implementation of new traffic laws. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e89–e97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova-Powell T, Hedlund J, Leaf W, Tison J. Evaluation of State Ignition Interlock Programs: Interlock Use Analyses from 28 States, 2006–2011. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran G, Field C, Foreman M, Ylioja T, Brown CV. Effects of brief intervention on subgroups of injured patients who drink at risk levels. Inj Prev. 2015;0:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Compton R. The Use of Safety Checkpoints for DWI Enforcement. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Compton RP, Berning A. Drug and Alcohol Crash Risk. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Daley JI, Stahre MA, Chaloupka FJ, Naimi TS. The impact of a 25-cent-per-drink alcohol tax increase. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang JN. Statistical Analysis of Alcohol-Related Driving Trends, 1982–2005. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2008. DOT HS 810 942.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung DJ, Tashima HN, Masten SV. An evaluation of the effectiveness of ignition interlock in California. Paper presented at: 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; January 11, 2005; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety. 2015. Available at: http://dadss.org/. Accessed June 7, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Elder RW, Lawrence B, Ferguson A, et al. The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder RW, Voas R, Beirness D, et al. Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-related crashes: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:362–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis M. Impairment detection of Lumidigm's biometric platform. Paper presented at: MADD Technology Symposium; June 19, 2006; Albuquerque, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Epperlein T. The Use of Sobriety Checkpoints as a Deterrent: An Impact Assessment. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Public Safety; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reports. 2013. Available at: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-29. Accessed June 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fell JC, Langston EA, Lacey JH, Tippetts AS, Cotton R. Evaluation of Seven Publicized Enforcement Programs to Reduce Impaired Driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Indiana, Michigan, and Texas. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fell JC, Tippetts AS, Voas RB. Fatal traffic crashes involving drinking drivers: what have we learned? Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:63–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fell JC, Voas RB. Mothers against Drunk Driving (MADD): the first 25 years. Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7(3):195–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fell JC, Voas RB. The effectiveness of a 0.05 blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving in the United States. Addiction. 2014;109:869–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governors Highway Safety Association. Sobriety Checkpoint Laws. 2015. Available at: http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/check-point_laws.html. Accessed June 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hingson RW, Heeren T, Edwards EM, Saitz R. Young adults at risk for excess alcohol consumption are often not asked or counseled about drinking alcohol. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(2):179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingson RW, Wenxing Z, Iannotti RJ, Simons-Morton B. Physician advice to adolescents about drinking and other health behaviors. Pediatrics. 2013;131:249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. State court decisions on the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints. 2015. Available at: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/laws/checkpoints. Accessed June 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, et al. The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009;28:301–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr WC, Patterson D, Greenfield TK, et al. US alcohol affordability and real tax rates, 1950–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey JH, Jones RK, Smith RG. An Evaluation of Checkpoint Tennessee: Tennessee's Statewide Sobriety Checkpoint Program. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey JH, Kelley-Baker T, Ferguson SA, Rider RP. Low-manpower checkpoints: can they provide effective DUI enforcement for small communities? Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7(3):213–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacey JH, Marchetti LM, Stewart JR, et al. Enforcement and Public Information Strategies for the General Deterrence of DWI: The Boise City, Idaho, Experience. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey JH, Stewart JR, Marchetti LM, et al. Enforcement and Public Information Strategies for DWI General Deterrence: Arrest Drunk Driving: The Clearwater and Largo, Florida Experiences. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert DK, Myers ME Jr, Oberdier L, Sultan MF, Thrush CM, Li T. Passive Sensing of Driver Intoxication. Warrendale, PA: SAE International; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Landy MS, Davey CJ, Quintero D, Pecora A, McShane KE. A systematic review on the effectiveness of brief interventions for alcohol misuse among adults in emergency departments. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy D, Asch P, Shea D. An assessment of county programs to reduce driving while intoxicated. Health Educ Res. 1990;5:247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Levy D, Shea D, Asch P. Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey. Am J Public Health. 1988;79:291–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund AK, McCartt AT, Farmer CM. Contribution of Alcohol-Impaired Driving to Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths in 2010. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald S, Zhao J, Martin G, et al. The impact on alcohol-related collisions of the partial decriminalization of impaired driving in British Columbia, Canada. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB. The alcohol interlock: an underutilized resource for predicting and controlling drunk drivers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003a;4(3):188–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB. Comparative and joint prediction of DUI recidivism from alcohol ignition interlock and driver records. J Stud Alcohol. 2003b;64:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB. Case-managed alcohol interlock programs: a bridge between the criminal and health systems. J Traffic Med. 1995;23(2):77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Roth R, Tippetts AS. Evaluation of the New Mexico Ignition Interlock Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. Behavioral measures of drinking: patterns in the interlock record. Addiction. 2003;98(Suppl 2):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartt AT, Leaf WA, Farmer CM, Eichelberger AH. Washington State's alcohol ignition interlock law: effects on recidivism among first-time DUI offenders. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(3):215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of State Police et al. v. Sitz et al. 429 N.W. 2d 190 (Mich. App. 1988), 88-1897, 496 US (US 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Miller TR, Galbraith M, Lawrence BA. Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59:465–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz H, Burns M, Fiorentino D, Smiley A, Zador P. Driver Characteristics and Impairment at Various BACs. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Moulton BE, Peterson A, Haddix D, Drew L. National Survey of Drinking and Driving Attitudes and Behaviors: 2008: Vol II. Findings Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSAUS; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer VA, and the US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: Recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(3):210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen J, Ryan SR, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM. Feasibility of a computer-assisted alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment program for DWI offenders. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2015;10(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Fact Sheet. Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities and Fatality Rate: 1899–2003. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2014 Crash Data Key Findings. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2015a. Report No. DOT HS 812 219.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. State Alcohol-Impaired Driving Estimates: 2013 Data. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2015b. Report No. DOT HS 812 188.
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. Reaching Zero: Actions to Eliminate Alcohol-Impaired Driving [Safety Report]. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board; 2013a.
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. Safety Recommendation H-13-006. 2013b. http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.recsearch/Recommen-dation.aspx?Rec=H-13-006.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson TF, Xuan Z, Babor TF, et al. Efficacy and the strength of evidence of US alcohol control policies. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(1):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. The Use of Sobriety Checkpoints for Impaired Driving Enforcement. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Author, Office of Enforcement and Emergency Services; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Law Enforcement Training Video on Sobriety Checkpoints. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Author; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Saturation Patrols and Sobriety Checkpoints: A How-to Guide for Planning and Publicizing Impaired Driving Enforcement Efforts. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Author; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Low-Staffing Sobriety Checkpoints. Washington, DC: Author; 2006. DOT HS 810 590.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Screening for Risk and Needs Using the Impaired Driving Assessment. Washington, DC; 2014. DOT HS 812 022.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Fatality Analysis Reporting System data files, 1982–2013. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from http://nhtsa.gov/FARS
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Fatality Analysis Reporting System data files, 2002–2006. Retrieved November 8, 2008, from http://nhtsa.gov/FARS.
   Google Scholar
• Ouimet MC, Dongier M, Di Leo I, et al. A randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: a 5‐year follow‐up of traffic offenses and crashes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:1979–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton R, Deluca P, Kaner E, Newbury-Birch D, Phillips T, Drummond C. Alcohol screening and brief intervention for adolescents: the how, what and where of reducing alcohol consumption and related harm among young people. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;49:207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek-Asa C. The effect of random alcohol screening in reducing motor vehicle crash injuries. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(Suppl):57–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross HL. The Deterrent Capability of Sobriety Checkpoints: Summary of the American Literature. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ross HL, Voas RB. The new Philadelphia story: the effects of severe punishment for drunk driving. Law Policy. 1990;12:51–79.
   Google Scholar
• Roth R. 2013 Survey of currently-installed interlocks in the US. 2013. Available at: http://www.rothinterlock.org/2013_survey_of_currently_installed_interlocks_in_the_us_revised-12_17_13.pdf. Accessed Dec-ember 20, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roth R, Voas RB, Marques P. A note on the effectiveness of a house arrest alternative for motivating DWI offenders to install ignition interlocks. J Safety Res. 2009;40:437–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(Suppl):66–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinka-Fry K, Tanner-Smith E, Hennessy E. Effects of brief alcohol interventions on drinking and driving among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Prev. 2015;1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stuster JW, Blowers MA. Experimental Evaluation of Sobriety Checkpoint Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith EE, Lipsey MW. Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015;51:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeters JB, Borsari B, Martens MP, Murphy JG. Brief motivational interventions are associated with reductions in alcohol-impaired driving among college drinkers. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015;76:700–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timken D, Marques PR. Support for Interlock Planning (SIP): Participants Workbook. 2001a. Available at: http://www.pire.org/sip/sipmanuals.htm. Accessed April 20, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Timken D, Marques PR. Support for Interlock Planning (SIP): Providers Manual. 2001b. Available at: http://www.pire.org/sip/sipmanuals.htm. Accessed April 20, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tippetts AS, Voas RB. The effectiveness of the West Virginia interlock program. J Traffic Med. 1998;26(1–2):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. Special Report 300: Achieving Traffic Safety Goals in the United States: Lessons from Other Nations. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Science, Committee for the Study of Traffic Safety Lessons from Benchmark Nations; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress Transportation Reauthorization. Public Law 112-141: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act or the Map-21; 2012 126 Stat. 4052012.
   Google Scholar
• US Government Accountability Office. Traffic Safety: Alcohol Ignition Interlocks Are Effective While Installed; Less Is Known about How to Increase Installation Rates. Washington, DC: Author; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vézina L. The Quebec alcohol interlock program: Impact on recidivism and crashes. In: Mayhew D, Dussault C, eds. Proceedings of Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety–T 2002: 16th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs &Traffic Safety, August 4–9, 2002. Vol 1. Québec City, QC, Canada: Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec; 2002:97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB. Cars That Drunks Can't Drive. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Research Center; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Blackman KO, Tippetts AS, Marques PR. Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. Accid Anal Prev. 2002;34:449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Marques PR. Commentary: barriers to interlock implementation. Traffic Inj Prev. September 2003;4(3):183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction. 1999;94:1849–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Rhodenizer AE, Lynn C. Evaluation of Charlottesville Checkpoint Operations. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1985. DOT HS 806 989.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Bergen G, Grosz M, Marques P. Mandating treatment based on interlock performance: evidence for effectiveness. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015; under review.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Grosz M. Administrative reinstatement interlock programs: Florida, a 10-year study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:1243–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Romano E, Fisher DA, Kelley-Baker T. Alcohol involvement in fatal crashes under three crash exposure measures. Traffic Inj Prev. June 2007;8(2):107–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagenaar AC, Livingston MD, Staras SS. Effects of a 2009 Illinois alcohol tax increase on fatal motor vehicle crashes. Am J Public Health. 2015:e1–e6.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar AC, Maldonado-Molina, MM. Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976–2002. 2007; Journal of Safety Research, 38:493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar AC, Maldonado-Molina MM, Erickson DJ, Ma L, Tobler AL, Komro KA. General deterrence effects of US statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: long-term follow-up in 32 states. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:982–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar AC, Maldonado-Molina MM, Ma L, Tobler A, Komro K. Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002. J Safety Res. 2007;38:493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells JK, Preusser DF, Williams AF. Enforcing alcohol-impaired driving and seat belt use laws, Binghamton, New York. J Safety Res. 1992;23(2):63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J. Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AF, Ferguson SA, Cammisa MX. Self-reported Drinking and Driving Practices and Attitudes in Four Countries and Perceptions of Enforcement. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Willis C, Lybrand S, Bellamy N. Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Cochran Database Syst Rev. 2004;18(4):CD004168.
   Google Scholar
• Wojnar M, Jakubczyk A. Brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in accident and emergency departments. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Strategies to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol: Draft Global Strategy. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. List of countries' BAC limits for driving. 2013. Available at: http://apps.who.int/gho/athena/data/GHO/SA_00-00001520.html?profile=ztable&filter=COUNTRY:*;BACGROUP:*. Accessed May 9, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zador P, Krawchuk S, Moore B. Drinking and Driving Trips, Stops by Police, and Arrests: Analyses of the 1995 National Survey of Drinking and Driving Attitudes and Behavior. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Blincoe L. Costs of alcohol-involved crashes, United States, 2010. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2013;57:3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaouk A, Wills M, Traube E, Strassburger R. Driver alcohol detection system for safety (DADSS)—a status update. Paper presented at: 24th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar