How do significant others influence our driving? A descriptive study of ego–alter dyads in a college population

References

• Alejandro de Dios M, Stanton CA, Caviness CM, Niaura R, Stein MD. The social support and social network characteristics of smokers in methadone maintenance treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2013;39:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:248–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Ali B, Daughters SB. Distress tolerance as a predictor of risky and aggressive driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Daughters SB, Ali B. Hurried driving: relationship to distress tolerance, driver anger, aggressive and risky driving in college students. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Hartos JL, Simons-Morton BG. Parent–teen disagreement of parent-imposed restrictions on teen driving after one month of licensure: is discordance related to risky teen driving? Prev Sci. 2005;6(3):177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Treiman KA. The relationship of social context of drinking, perceived social norms and parental influence to various drinking patterns of adolescents. Addict Behav. 1996;21:633–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Watters S. Characteristics of college students who text while driving: do their perceptions of a significant other influence their decisions? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;37:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham CR, Zakrajsek JS, Amani F, Slope JT, Sayer TB. Do as I say, not as I do: distracted driving behavior of teens and their parents. J Safety Res. 2015;22:21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cestac J, Paran F, Delhomme P. Drive as I say, not as I drive: influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on speeding intentions among young drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2014;23:44–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M. A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:834–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiter JJ, Lennon A, Watson B. How do other people influence your driving speed? Exploring the “who” and the “how” of social influences on speeding from a qualitative perspective. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2010;13:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Houlihan AE, Stock ML, Pomery EA. A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: the prototype willingness model. Dev Rev. 2008;28:29–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Iglesias B, Gómez-Fraguela JA, Luengo MA. Sensation seeking and drunk driving: the mediational role of social norms and self-efficacy. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;71:22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill L, Rybar J, Styer T, Fram E, Merchant G, Eastman A. Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-H, Kim KS. The role of sensation seeking, perceived peer pressure, and harmful alcohol use in riding with an alcohol-impaired driver. Accident Anal Prev. 2012;48:326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden P, Friedkin N. Network studies and social influence. Sociol Methods Res. 1993;22:127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meesmann U, Martensen H, Dupont E. Impact of alcohol checks and social norm on driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Accid Anal Prev. 2015;80:251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller M, Haustein S. Peer influence on speeding behavior among male drivers 18 and 28. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;64:92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimet MC, Pradhan AK, Simons-Morton BG, Divekar G, Mehranian H, Fisher DL. The effect of male teenage passengers on male teenage drivers: findings from a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;58:132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, Hoyle RH, Stephenson MT. Television campaigns and sensation seeking targeting of adolescent marijuana use: a controlled time series approach. In Hornick RC, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002:35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Riquelme HE, Al-Sammak FS, Rios RA. Social influences among young drivers on talking on the mobile phone while driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross L, Greene D, House P. The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attributional processes. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1977;13:279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons-Morton BG, Ouimet MC, Chen R, et al. Peer influence predicts speeding prevalence among teenage drivers. J Safety Res. 2012;43:397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubman-Ben-Ari O, Kaplan S, Lotan T, Prato CG. Parents' and peers' contribution to risky driving of male teen drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;78:81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters SE, Beck KH. A qualitative study of college students' perceptions of risky driving and social influences. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde G. Social interaction patterns in driver behavior: an introductory review. Hum Factors. 1976;18:477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar