Evaluation of biofidelity of THUMS pedestrian model under a whole-body impact conditions with a generic sedan buck

References

• Arnoux PJ, Behr M, Llari M, Thollon L, Brunet C. Injury criteria implementation and evaluation in FE models applications to lower limb segments. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13:653–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banglmaier RF, Dvoracek-Driskna D, Oniang'o TE, Haut RC. Axial Compressive Load Response of the 90 Degrees Flexed Human Tibiofemoral Joint. 1999. SAE Technical Paper No. 99SC08. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Barbat S, Fu Y, Zhan Z, Yang RJ, Gehre C. Objective rating metric for dynamic systems. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); May 27–30, 2013; Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Bass CR, Lucas SR, Salzar RS, et al. Failure properties of cervical spinal ligaments under fast strain rate deformations. Spine. 2007;32:E7–E13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Poulard D, Crandall JR, Panzer MB. Pedestrian response with different initial positions during impact with a mid-sized sedan. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 8–11, 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Joodaki H, Forghani A, et al. Biofidelity corridors for whole-body pedestrian impact with a generic buck. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference; September 9–11, 2015a; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Joodaki H, Forghani A, et al. Whole-body response for pedestrian impact with a generic sedan buck. Stapp Car Crash J. 2015b;59:401–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funk JR, Srinivasan S, Crandall JR, et al. The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:245–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golman AJ, Danelson KA, Miller LE, Stitzel JD. Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;64:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunji Y, Okamoto M, Takahashi Y. Examination of human body mass influence on pedestrian pelvis injury prediction using a human FE model. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 12–14, 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsson BJ, Lessley DJ, Kerrigan JR, et al. Dynamic response corridors and injury thresholds of the pedestrian lower extremities. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 22–24, 2004; Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Kisanuki Y, Watanabe I, Furusu K, Miki K, Hasegawa J. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 18–20, 2002; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Jani D, Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Goyal R, Vusirikala N, Jayaraman S. Repositioning the knee joint in human body FE models using a graphics-based technique. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Patrie J. Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not to load distribution. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;149(2–3):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan JR, Drinkwater DC, Kam CY, et al. Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:607–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppa S. Injury Criteria for Side Impact Dummies. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2004. Report No. DOT 67.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppa S, Eppinger RH, McKoy F, Nguyen T, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N. Development of side impact thoracic injury criteria and their application to the modified Es-2 dummy with rib extensions (Es-2Re). Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:189–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li G, Yang J, Simms C. The influence of gait stance on pedestrian lower limb injury risk. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;85:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeno T, Hasegawa J. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to car–pedestrian impacts. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference; June 4–7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer E, Wei F, Button K, Powell J, Haut R. Determination of ligament strain during high ankle sprains due to excessive external foot rotation in sports. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 12–14, 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Mo FH, Arnoux PJ, Cesari D, Masson C. Investigation of the injury threshold of knee ligaments by the parametric study of car–pedestrian impact conditions. Saf Sci. 2014;62:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas R, Davidsson J, Brolin K. Head kinematics and shoulder biomechanics in shoulder impacts similar to pedestrian crashes—a THUMS study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas R, Osth J, Davidsson J. Which pragmatic finite element human body model scaling technique can most accurately predict head impact conditions in pedestrian–car crashes? Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 9–11, 2015; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, Forsberg C, Takahashi Y, et al. Development and component validation of a generic vehicle front buck for pedestrian impact evaluation. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 10–12, 2014; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Chen H, Crandall JR, Dziewonski T, Pedzisz M, Panzer MB. Component-level biofidelity assessment of morphed pedestrian finite element models. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference; September 9–11, 2015; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Chen H, Panzer MB. Geometrical Personalization of Pedestrian Finite Element Models Using Morphing Increases the Biofidelity of Their Impact Kinematics. 2016. SAE Technical Paper No. 2016-01-1506. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Subit DL, Donlon JP, Kent RW. Development of a computational framework to adjust the pre-impact spine posture of a whole-body model based on cadaver tests data. J Biomech. 2015;48:636–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn KP, Winkelstein BA. Cervical facet capsular ligament yield defines the threshold for injury and persistent joint-mediated neck pain. J Biomech. 2007;40:2299–2306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker JG, Muser MH, Walz FH. Assessment of pelvis and upper leg injury risk in car–pedestrian collisions: comparison of accident statistics, impactor tests and a human body finite element model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:437–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers, Human Biomechanics and Simulations Standards Steering Committee. Performance Specifications for a Midsize Male Pedestrian Research Dummy. 2010. Surface Vehicle Information Report J2782. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Subit DL, Kerrigan JR, Crandall JR, et al. Pedestrian–vehicle interaction kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 17–19, 2008; Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Ikeda M, Asanuma H, et al. Full-scale validation of a generic buck for pedestrian impact simulation. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) Conference; September 10–12, 2014; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney GJ, Joodaki H, Krosshaug T, Forman J, Crandall JR, Simms CK. Assessment of model-based image-matching for future reconstruction of unhelmeted sport head impact kinematics. Sports Biomech. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajkovski A, Omerovic S, Hribernik M, Prebil I. Failure properties and damage of cervical spine ligaments, experiments and modeling. J Biomech Eng. 2014;031002-031002-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Untaroiu CD, Shin J, Ivarsson BJ, et al. A study of the pedestrian impact kinematics using finite element dummy models: the corridors and dimensional analysis scaling of upper-body trajectories. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13:469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe R, Katsuhara T, Miyazaki H, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T. Research of the relationship of pedestrian injury to collision speed, car-type, impact location and pedestrian sizes using human FE model (THUMS version 4). Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:269–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a Decade of Action. Luxembourg: World Health Organization Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuki T, Yamamae Y. Validation of kinematics and lower extremity injuries estimated by total human model for safety in SUV to pedestrian impact test. J Biomech Sci Eng. 2010;5:340–356.
   Google Scholar