Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes

References

• Antin JF, Wotring B, Perez M, Glaser D. Investigating Lane Change Behaviors and Difficulties for Senior Drivers Using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Database. Blacksburg, VA: National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence; 2017. 17-UM-055.
   Google Scholar
• Braitman KA, McCartt AT, Zuby DS, Singer J. Volvo and Infiniti drivers’ experiences with select crash avoidance technologies. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:270–278. doi:10.1080/15389581003735600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 2017a;99(Pt A):142–152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. Effects of rearview cameras and rear parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017b;18:859–865. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1317758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. Real-World Effects of General Motors Rear Automatic Braking, Rear Vision Camera, and Rear Parking Assist Systems Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB, McCartt AT. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:298–303. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.936408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fildes B, Keall M, Bos N, et al. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;81:24–29. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannagan CA, Kiefer RJ, Bao S, Leblanc DJ, Geisler SP. Reduction of backing crashes by production rear vision camera systems. Journal of Ergonomics. 2014;S3:1–4. doi:10.4172/2165-7556.S3-008
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Insurance Special Report: Standard Versus Nonstandard Risk Insurance Losses. Arlington, VA: Author; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Volvo collision avoidance feaures: initial results. HLDI Bulletin. 2012;29(5):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Evaluation of motorcycle antilock braking systems. HLDI Bulletin. 2014;31(11):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Acura collision avoidance features—a 2016 update. HLDI Bulletin. 2016a;33(19):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Buick collision avoidance features: an update. HLDI Bulletin. 2016b;33(18):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Fiat Chrysler collision avoidance features: initial results. HLDI Bulletin. 2016c;33(2):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Mercedes-Benz collision avoidance features—a 2016 update. HLDI Bulletin. 2016d;33(23):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Vehicle Information Report, HLDI Facts and Figures: 1981–2017 Vehicle Fleet. Arlington, VA: Highway Loss Data Institute; 2016e.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. 2013–16 Subaru collision avoidance features. HLDI Bulletin. 2017a;34(10):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Mazda collision avoidance features: 2007–16. HLDI Bulletin. 2017b;34(8):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(Suppl 1):S104–S111. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1396320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jermakian JS. Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:732–740. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, Cicchino JB, Reagan IJ, Kerfoot LB. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18(Suppl 1):S44–S50. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1297532
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiefer RJ, Hankey JM. Lane change behavior with a side blind zone alert system. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:683–690. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AF, Cassavaugh N, Horrey WJ, Becic E, Mayhugh JL. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving. Hum Factors. 2007;49:935–949. doi:10.1518/001872007X230271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavalliere M, Laurendeau D, Simoneau M, Teasdale N. Changing lanes in a simulator: effects of aging on the control of the vehicle and visual inspection of mirrors and blind spot. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12(2):191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavalliere M, Reimer B, Mehler B, D’Ambrosio L, Wang Y. The effect of age and gender on visual search during lane changing. Paper presented at: Sixth International Driving Symposim on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc DJ, Sayer J, Winkler C, Bogard S, Devonshire J. Field test results of a road departure crash warning system: driver utilzation and safety implications. Paper presented at: Fourth International Driving Symposim on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen EC, Lee SE, Wierwille WW, Goodman MJ. Analysis of distribution, frequency, and duration of naturalistic lane changes. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2002;46:1789–1793. doi:10.1177/154193120204602203
   Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, Cicchino JB, Kerfoot LB, Weast RA. Crash avoidance and driver assistance technologies—are they used? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2018;52:176–190. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijerina L, Garrott W, Stoltzfus D, Parmer E. Eye glance behavior of van and passenger car drivers during lane change decision phase. Transp Res Rec. 2005;1937:37–43. doi:10.3141/1937-06
   Google Scholar
• Wang J-S, Knipling RR. Lane Change/Merge Crashes Problem Size Assessment and Statistical Description. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1994. DOT HS 808 075.
   Google Scholar