Strategies for accelerating the implementation of non-intrusive alcohol detection systems in the vehicle fleet

References

• AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety 2019. Traffic Safety Culture Index 2020. Washington (DC).
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. 2017. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 99(Pt A):142–152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirincione R. 2006. Innovation and stagnation in automotive safety and fuel efficiency.. Center for the Study of Responsive Law.
   Google Scholar
• Elder RW, Voas R, Beirness D, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Compton R, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. 2011. Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 40(3):362–376. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETSC. 2018. 7 smart ways of tackling drink-driving in the EU. Brussels (Belgium): ETSC.
   Google Scholar
• ETSC. 2019. Progress in reducing drink driving and other alcohol-related road deaths in Europe. Brussels (Belgium): ETSC.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM. 2020. Potential lives saved by in-vehicle alcohol detection systems. Ruckersville (VA): Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson SA. 2012. Alcohol-impaired driving in the United States: contributors to the problem and effective countermeasures. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(5):427–441. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.656858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson SA, Zaouk A, Strohl C, Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) 2010. Background and rationale for technology approaches. Society for Automotive Engineers Technical Paper, Paper No. 2010-01-1580. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson SA, Traube E, Zaouk A, Strassburger R. 2011. Driver Alcohol Detection System For Safety (DADSS)—Phase I prototype testing and finding. Paper Number 11-0230. Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman S, Chandan A, Tal G, Turrentine T. 2017. The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles—a review of the evidence. Renew. Sust Energ Rev. 80:1100–1111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. 2018. IIHS crashworthiness evaluation programs and the U.S. vehicle fleet—a 2018 update. Bulletin. 35(22).
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2019. 10 automakers equipped most of their 2018 vehicles with automatic emergency braking. [accessed 2020 Sep 9]. https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/10-automakers-equipped-most-of-their-2018-vehicles-with-automatic-emergency-braking.
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. 2016. Zero road deaths and serious injuries: Leading a paradigm shift to a safe system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ. 2015. Lives saved by vehicle safety technologies and associated federal motor vehicle safety standards, 1960 to 2012—passenger cars and LTVs. Paper Number 15-0291. Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, Reagan IJ. 2019. System attributes that influence reported improvement in drivers’ experiences with adaptive cruise control and active lane keeping after daily use in five production vehicles. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 35(11):972–979. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1561786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahausse JA, Fildes BN. 2009. Cost-benefit analysis of an alcohol ignition interlock for installation in all newly registered vehicles. Traffic Inj Prev. 10(6):528–537. doi:10.1080/15389580903173706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson P, Jakobsson L, Hultman S. 2011. Alcohol interlock systems in Sweden: 10 years of systematic work. Am J Prev Med. 40(3):378–379. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty EE, Tung G, Shulman-Laniel J, Hardy R, Rutkow L, Frattaroli S, Vernick JS. 2016. Ignition interlock laws: effects on fatal motor vehicle crashes, 1982–2013. Am J Public Health. 52:417–423.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2019. Traffic safety facts. Alcohol-impaired driving. DOT HS 812 864. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2016. Zero road deaths and serious injuries: leading a paradigm shift to a safe system. International Transport Forum of the Organisation for Economic Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, Cicchino JB, Kerfoot LB, Weast RA. 2018. Crash avoidance and driver assistance technologies—are they used? Transportation Part F. 52:176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Cockfield S, Truong J. 2011. Increasing the uptake of key vehicle safety features—a consumer focused approach. Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC, USA. [accessed 2020 Sept 9]. https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/22/isv7/main.htm.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global status report on road safety. Washington (DC): WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Zaouk A, Willis M, Traube E, Strassburger R. (2019.) Driver alcohol detection system for safety (DADSS)—a non-regulatory approach in the research and development of vehicle safety technology to reduce alcohol-impaired driving—a status update. Paper Number 19-0260. Proceedings of the 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
   Google Scholar