References
- Beckers N, Schreiner S, Bertrand P, Mehler B, Reimer B. 2017. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving. Appl Ergon. 58:25–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.005
- Costagliola G, De Rosa M, Fuccella V. 2017. Handwriting on smartwatches: an empirical investigation. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst. 47(6):1100–1109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2754938
- Cuaresma J, MacKenzie IS. 2013. A study of variations of QWERTY soft keyboards for mobile phones. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Human-Computer Interaction. July 18–19, Ottawa, Canada.
- Dingus TA, Guo F, Lee S, Antin JF, Perez M, Buchanan-King M, Hankey J. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(10):2636–2641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513271113
- Jacobson MT, Matthews P. 1996. Generating uniformly distributed random Latin squares. J Combin Designs. 4(6):405–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6610(1996)4:6<405::AID-JCD3>3.0.CO;2-J
- Kujala T. 2013. Browsing the information highway while driving: three in-vehicle touch screen scrolling methods and driver distraction. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 17(5):815–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0517-2
- Li Y, You F, You X, Ji M. 2019. Smartphone text input: effects of experience and phrase complexity on user performance, physiological reaction, and perceived usability. Appl Ergon. 80:200–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.019
- Metz B, Schoch S, Just M, Kuhn F. 2014. How do drivers interact with navigation systems in real life conditions? Results of a field-operational-test on navigation systems. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 24(1):146–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.011
- Nguyen H, Bartha MC. 2012. Shape writing on tablets: better performance or better experience? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 56(1):1591–1593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561317
- Onate-Vega D, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, King M. 2020. How drivers adapt their behaviour to changes in task complexity: the role of secondary task demands and road environment factors. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 71:145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.015
- Paelke GM. 1993. A comparison of route guidance destination entry methods. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 37(9):569–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129303700911
- Peng Y, Boyle LN. 2015. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems . Accid Anal Prev. 85:93–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.002
- Reimer B, Mehler B, Lammers V, Wang Y, Coughlin JF. 2009. A comparison of three manual destination entry methods on their impact on visual attention and driving performance: an on-road evaluation. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 53(23):1757–1761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905302303
- Ruan S, Wobbrock JO, Liou K, Ng A, Landay JA. 2018. Comparing speech and keyboard text entry for short messages in two languages on touchscreen phones. Proc Acm Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1(4):1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3161187
- Rydström A, Broström R, Bengtsson P. 2012. A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. Appl Ergon. 43(3):507–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.004
- Smith AL, Chaparro BS. 2015. Smartphone text input method performance, usability, and preference with younger and older adults. Hum Factors. 57(6):1015–1028. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815575644
- Tijerina L, Parmer E, Goodman MJ. 1998. Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving: a test track study. Paper presented at: The 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems; October 12–16, Seoul, Korea.
- Tsimhoni O, Smith D, Green P. 2004. Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Hum Factors. 46(4):600–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.600.56813
- Turner CJ, Chaparro BS, He J. 2017. Text input on a smartwatch QWERTY keyboard: tap vs. trace. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 33(2):143–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1223265
- Turner CJ, Chaparro BS, He J. 2021. Typing on a smartwatch while mobile: a comparison of input methods. Hum Factors. 63(6):974–986. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819891291
- Wickens CD. 2008. Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors. 50(3):449–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394
- Yared T, Patterson P, All E. 2020. Are safety and performance affected by navigation system display size, environmental illumination, and gender when driving in both urban and rural areas? Accid Anal Prev. 142:105585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105585
- Zhong Q, Zhi J, Guo G. 2022. Dynamic is optimal: effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction. Traffic Inj Prev. 23(1):51–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.2010052
- Ziakopoulos A, Theofilatos A, Papadimitriou E, Yannis G. 2019. A meta-analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety. IATSS Res. 43(3):185–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.01.003