Crash characteristics and injury risk of adult car occupants in near-side impacts

References

• Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 1998. Abbreviated injury scale; 1990 revision: update 98. Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM).
   Google Scholar
• Augenstein J, Perdeck E, Stratton J, Digges K, Bahouth G. 2003. Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 47:561–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bareiss M, Gabler HC. 2020. Estimating near side crash injury risk in best performing passenger vehicles in the United States. Accid Anal Prev. 138:105434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilston LE, Du W, Brown J. 2010. A matched-cohort analysis of belted front and rear seat occupants in newer and older model vehicles shows that gains in front occupant safety have outpaced gains for rear seat occupants. Accid Anal Prev. 42(6):1974–1977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman K, Rosén E, Sunnevang C, Boström O. 2009. Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts. Ann Adv Automot Med. 53:3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohman K, Shaikh J. 2016 Sept 14–16. Real life situations for rear‐seated occupants in far‐side impacts. Paper presented at: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI); Malaga, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, McMurry TL. 2018. Nonlinear models of injury risk and implications in intervention targeting for thoracic injury mitigation. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S103–S108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1528356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton CE, Gabler HC. 2009. NASS/CDS delta-V estimates: the influence of enhancements to the WinSmash crash reconstruction code. Ann Adv Automot Med. 53:91–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hampton CE, Gabler HC. 2010. Evaluation of the accuracy of NASS/CDS delta-V estimates from the enhanced WinSmash algorithm. Ann Adv Automot Med. 54:241–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain Q, Feng H, Grzebieta R, Brijs T, Olivier J. 2019 Aug. The relationship between impact speed and the probability of pedestrian fatality during a vehicle-pedestrian crash: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 129:241–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, About our tests. [accessed 2021 Jul 26]. https://www.iihs.org/ratings/about-our-tests#side-crash-test.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Gabler HC. 2011 Jun 13–16. Evaluation of winsmash accuracy in NHTSA side crash test reconstructions. Paper presented at: The 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhaced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ. 1999. Evaluation of FMVSS 214 side impact protection dynamic performance requirement. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Report no. DOT HS 809 004.
   Google Scholar
• Kononen DW, Flannagan CA, Wang SC. 2011. Identification and validation of a logistic regression model for predicting serious injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):112–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftis KL, Price J, Gillich PJ. 2018. Evolution of the Abbreviated Injury Scale: 1990-2015. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S109–S113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1512747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley T. 2011. Complex surveys: a guide to analysis using R. NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui Y. 2004. Proposal of injury risk curves for evaluating pedestrian head injury risk using headform impactor based on accident reconstruction. Trans Soc Automotive Eng Jpn. 35(4):221–228.
   Google Scholar
• McMurry TL, Poplin GS. 2015. Statistical considerations in the development of injury risk functions. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(6):618–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.991820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger KB, Gruschow S, Durbin DR, Curry AE. 2015. Association between NCAP ratings and real-world rear seat occupant risk of injury. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(Suppl 2):S146–S52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1061664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2020. Traffic safety facts 2018 annual report: a compilation of motor vehicle crash data. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Report no. DOT HS 812 981.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing;
   Google Scholar
• Samaha RR, Elliott DS. 2003 May 19–22. NHTSA side impact research: motivation for upgraded test procedures. Paper presented at: The 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhaced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnevång C, Rosén E, Boström O, Lechelt U. 2010. Thoracic injury risk as a function of crash severity - car-to-car side impact tests with WorldSID compared to real-life crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 54:159–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2010. Severe injury to near- and far-seated occupants in side impacts by crash severity and belt use. Traffic Inj Prev. 11(1):69–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580903479178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. 2005. Regression methods in Biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar