An empirical analysis of driver injury severities in work-zone and non-work-zone crashes involving single-vehicle large trucks

References

• Bhat C. 2001. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transp Res Part B. 35(7):677–693. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. 2021. Large trucks are involved in 1/3 of all fatal crashes occurring in work zones [accessed 2021 Dec 20]. https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/newsroom/large-trucks-are-involved-13-all-fatal-crashes-occurring-work-zones.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Asgari H, Azimi G, Rahimi A, Jin X. 2021. Analysis of truck-involved work zone crash fatalities in Florida. Paper presented at: 100th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No: 21-01584; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Harb R, Radwan E, Yan X, Pande A, Abdel-Aty M. 2008. Freeway work-zone crash analysis and risk identification using multiple and conditional logistic regression. J Transp Eng. 134(5):203–214. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:5(203)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M. 2021. The effect of motorcyclists’ age on injury severities in single-motorcycle crashes with unobserved heterogeneity. J Safety Res. 77:125–138. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M. 2022. An analysis of motorcyclists’ injury severities in work-zone crashes with unobserved heterogeneity. J Internat Assoc Traffic and Safety Sci. 46(2):281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Islam M, Alnawmasi N, Mannering F. 2020. Unobserved heterogeneity and temporal instability in the analysis of work-zone crash-injury severities. Anal Methods Accid Res. 28:100130. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2020.100130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Hosseini P, Jalayer M. 2021. An analysis of single-vehicle truck crashes on rural curved segments accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. J Safety Res. 80:148–159.
   Google Scholar
• Islam M, Mannering F. 2020. A temporal analysis of driver-injury severities in crashes involving aggressive and non-aggressive driving. Anal Methods Accid Res. 27:100128. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2020.100128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Mannering F. 2022. An empirical analysis of how asleep/fatigued driving-injury severities have changed over time. J Trans Safety and Security. 1–24. doi:10.1080/19439962.2022.2070812
   Google Scholar
• Khattak AJ, Targa F. 2004. Injury severity and total harm in truck-involved work zone crashes. Transportation Research Record. 1877(1):106–116. doi:10.3141/1877-12
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Bai Y. 2008. Development of crash-severity-index models for the measurement of work zone risk levels. Accid Anal Prev. 40(5):1724–1731. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Bai Y. 2009. Highway work zone risk factors and their impact on crash severity. J Transp Eng. 135(10):694–701. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000055
   Google Scholar
• Mannering F, Shankar V, Bhat C. 2016. Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data. Anal Methods Accid Res. 11:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1981. Econometric models for probabilistic choice. Structural analysis of discrete data using econometric applications. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 15(5):447–470. doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Weng J, Qu X. 2010. A probabilistic quantitative risk assessment model for the long-term work zone crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 42(6):1866–1877. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton J, Shankar V, Mannering F. 2008. Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 40(1):260–266. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Work Zone Information Clearinghouse. 2021. Work zone fatal crashes and fatalities [accessed 2021 Jul 15]. https://www.workzonesafety.org/crash-information/work-zone-fatal-crashes-fatalities/#national.
   Google Scholar
• Osman M, Paleti R, Mishra S. 2018. Analysis of passenger car crash injury severity in different work zone configurations. Accid Anal Prev. 111:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze NN, Song Z. 2019. Factors contributing to injury severity in work zone related crashes in New Zealand. Internat J Sust Transp. 13(2):148–154. doi:10.1080/15568318.2018.1452083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarko A, Islam M, Thomaz J. 2011. Improving safety in high-speed work zones: a super 70 study. West Lafayette (IN): Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Train K. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Washington S, Karlaftis M, Mannering F, Anastasopoulos P. 2020. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. 3rd ed. New York (NY): CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar