Modeling pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes considering different land use patterns: Mixed logit approach

References

• Abay KA. 2013. Examining pedestrian-injury severity using alternative disaggregate models. Res. Transp. Econ. 43(1):123–136. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoh-Gyimah R, Aidoo EN, Akaateba MA, Appiah SK. 2017. The effect of natural and built environmental characteristics on pedestrian-vehicle crash severity in Ghana. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 24(4):459–468. doi:10.1080/17457300.2016.1232274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz HM, Ukkusuri SV, Hasan S. 2013. Exploring the determinants of pedestrian-vehicle crash severity in New York City. Accid Anal Prev. 50:1298–1309. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone R, Pelletti G, Garagnani M, Giusti A, Marzi M, Rossi F, Roffi R, Fais P, Pelotti S. 2019. Alcohol and illicit drugs in drivers involved in road traffic crashes in Italy. An 8-year retrospective study. Forens Sci Int. 305:110004. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Fan W. 2019. Modeling pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes in rural and urban areas: mixed logit model approach. Transport Res Rec. 2673(4):1023–1034. doi:10.1177/0361198119842825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton KJ, Burnier CV, Akar G. 2009. Severity of injury resulting from pedestrian–vehicle crashes: What can we learn from examining the built environment? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 14(6):425–436. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenchak NN. 2020. Residential development patterns and child pedestrian injuries. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 14(1):67–82. doi:10.1080/19439962.2020.1726543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleem K, Alluri P, Gan A. 2015. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations. Accid Anal Prev. 81:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwing S, Twisk D. 2015. Nothing good ever happens after midnight: observed exposure and alcohol use during weekend nights among young male drivers carrying passengers in a late licensing country. Accid Anal Prev. 75:61–68. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Ulfarsson GF, Shankar VN, Mannering FL. 2010. A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model. Accid Anal Prev. 42(6):1751–1758. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Pant P, Yamashita E. 2010. Accidents and accessibility: measuring influences of demographic and land use variables in Honolulu, Hawaii. Transport Res Rec. 2147(1):9–17. doi:10.3141/2147-02.
   Google Scholar
• Koppelman FS, Bhat C. 2006. A self instructing course in mode choice modelling: multinomial and nested logit models. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Ranjitkar P, Zhao Y, Yi H, Rashidi S. 2017. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity under different weather conditions. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(4):427–430. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1207762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Song L, Fan W. 2021. Day-of-the-week variations and temporal instability of factors influencing pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes: A random parameters logit approach with heterogeneity in means and variances. Anal Methods Accid Res. 29:100152. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering FL, Bhat CR. 2014. Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions. Anal Methods Accid Res. 1:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 15(5):447–470. doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5 < 447::AID-Jae570 > 3.0.CO;2-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RB, Rapkin C. 1954. Urban traffic: a function of land use. Publications of the Institute for Urban Land Use and Housing Studies, Columbia University. New York, Chichester (West Sussex): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Transportation. Crash Facts & Reporting. https://connect.ncdot.gov/business/DMV/Pages/Crash-Facts.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Park SH, Bae MK. 2020. Exploring the determinants of the severity of pedestrian injuries by pedestrian age: a case study of Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 17(7):2358. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Li Y, Fan WD, Liu P. 2021. Mixed logit approach to analyzing pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes in North Carolina: considering time-of-day and day-of-week. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(7):524–529. doi:10.1080/15389588.2021.1940983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Li Y, Fan W, Wu P. 2020. Modeling pedestrian-injury severities in pedestrian-vehicle crashes considering spatiotemporal patterns: Insights from different hierarchical Bayesian random-effects models. Anal Methods Accid Res. 28:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay R, Choi J, Kattan L, Khan A. 2011. A multinomial logit model of pedestrian-vehicle crash severity. Int J Sustain Transp. 5(4):233–249. doi:10.1080/15568318.2010.497547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toran Pour A, Moridpour S, Tay R, Rajabifard A. 2018. Influence of pedestrian age and gender on spatial and temporal distribution of pedestrian crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(1):81–87. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1341630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington S, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL. 2003. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ye F, Lord D. 2014. Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: Multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models. Anal Methods Accid Res. 1:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2013.03.001.
   Google Scholar