Response of small female and midsize male models with active musculature in pre-crash maneuvers and low-speed impacts

References

• Boyle K, Fanta A, Reed MP, Fischer K, Smith A, Adler A, Hu J. 2020. Restraint systems considering occupant diversity and pre-crash posture. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(sup1):S31–S36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan H, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2021. Assessment of acclimation of 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteer kinematics in low-speed frontal and frontal-oblique sled tests. SAE Int J Trans Safety. 9(1):3–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan H, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2022. Occupant kinematics of braced 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteers in low-speed frontal and frontal-oblique sled tests. IRCOBI Conference, Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Chan H, Devane KS, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2021. Comparisons of initial joint angles and test buck reaction forces for relaxed and braced 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteers and analogous active human body models in a simulated driver’s seat. IRCOBI Conference, Online.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Chan H, Albert D, Kemper AR, Gayzik FS. 2022. Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. (In press). doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2114078.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Johnson D, Gayzik FS. 2019. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(8):832–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayzik F, Koya B, Davis M. 2018. A preliminary study of human model head and neck response to frontal loading in nontraditional occupant seating configurations. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup1):S183–S186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hault-Dubrulle A, Robache F, Pacaux M-P, Morvan H. 2011. Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: A driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Zhang K, Reed MP, Wang J-T, Neal M, Lin C-H. 2019. Frontal crash simulations using parametric human models representing a diverse population. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup1):S97–S105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H, Min K. 2013. Development of a finite element model of 5th percentile female with multiple muscles and its application to investigation on impact responses of elderly females. Paper Presented at Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Jorlöv S, Bohman K, Larsson A. 2017. Seating positions and activities in highly automated cars–a qualitative study of future automated driving scenarios. Paper presented at: International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Kato D, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M. 2017. A study of muscle control with two feedback controls for posture and reaction force for more accurate prediction of occupant kinematics in low-speed frontal impacts. Paper presented at 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kitagawa Y, Hayashi S, Yamada K, Gotoh M. 2017. Occupant kinematics in simulated autonomous driving vehicle collisions: influence of seating position, direction and angle. SAE Technical Paper 2017-22-0005. doi: 10.4271/2017-22-0005
   Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Ghosh P, Chitteti R, Mayer C. 2021. Development of a Chinese 5th percentile female active human body model. IRCOBI Asia, Online.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2016. Federal automated vehicles policy: Accelerating the next revolution in roadway safety. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2019. Traffic safety facts 2017: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Report No. DOT HS 812 806.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Sathyanarayan D, Ye X, Crandall JR, Panzer MB. 2018. Active muscle response contributes to increased injury risk of lower extremity in occupant–knee airbag interaction. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup1):S76–S82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Carlsson S, Wismans J, Davidsson J. 2012. The occupant response to autonomous braking: a modeling approach that accounts for active musculature. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(3):265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Olafsdottir JM, Davidsson J, Brolin K. 2013. Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:1–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones MLH, Park B-K. 2021. Occupant dynamics during crash avoidance maneuvers. U.S. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 997.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones MLH, Park BKD, Hallman JJ, Sherony R. 2018. Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S70–S77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Park BKD, Jml H. 2018. Passenger kinematics during crash avoidance maneuvers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd R, Scarboro M, Saunders J. 2011. Injury analysis of real-world small overlap and oblique frontal crashes. Paper presented at 22nd ESV Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon JM, Kusano KD, Gabler HC. 2015. Analysis of driver evasive maneuvering prior to intersection crashes using event data recorders. Traffic Inj Prev. 16 Suppl 2:S182–S189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider LW. 1983. Development of anthropometrically based design specifications for an advanced adult anthropomorphic dummy family, Volume 1. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Final Report.
   Google Scholar