Application of surrogate safety measures in higher levels of automated vehicles simulation studies: A review of the state of the practice

References

• Abdulhafedh A. 2017. Road traffic crash data: an overview on sources, problems, and collection methods. JTTs. 07(02):206–219. doi:10.4236/jtts.2017.72015
   Google Scholar
• Arun A, Haque M, Washington S, Sayed T, Mannering F. 2021a. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a focus on application context. Anal Methods Accid Res. 32. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2021.100185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arun A, Haque M, Bhaskar A, Washington S, Sayed T. 2021b. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques. Accid Anal Prev. 153. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvin R, Khattak AJ, Kamrani M, Rio-Torres J. 2021. Safety evaluation of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic with conventional vehicles at intersections. J Intell Transp Syst. 25(2):170–187. doi:10.1080/15472450.2020.1834392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvin R, Khattak AJ, Rios-Torres J. 2019. Evaluating safety with automated vehicles at signalized intersections: application of adaptive cruise control in mixed traffic. Paper presented at: TRB 98^th Annual Meeting; January 13–17. Washington DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Astarita V, Giofrè VP, Guido G, Vitale A. 2021. A review of the use of traffic simulation for the evaluation of traffic safety levels: can we use simulation to predict crashes? Transp Res Procedia. 52:244–251. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.028
   Google Scholar
• Bahram M, Ghandeharioun Z, Zahn P, Bauer M, Huber W, Busch F. 2014. Microscopic traffic simulation based evaluation of highly automated driving on highways. 17th ITSC. 1752–1757.
   Google Scholar
• Balas VE, Balas MM. 2006. Driver assisting by inverse time to collision. World Automation Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Gettman D, Head L. 2003. Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models. Transport Res Rec. 1840(1):104–115. doi:10.3141/1840-12
   Google Scholar
• Geurs KT, Boon W, Van Wee B. 2009. Social impacts of transport: Literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transp Rev. 29(1):69–90. doi:10.1080/01441640802130490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman MF, Clarke JP, Gharehgozli AH, Hewitt M, de Koster R, Roy D. 2014. State of the practice: A review of the application of OR/MS in freight transportation. Interfaces. 44(6):535–554. doi:10.1287/inte.2014.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados ME, Persaud B, Rajeswaran T, Saleem T. 2018. Using microsimulation to evaluate the impact of automated vehicles on safety performance of signalized intersections. Paper presented at: TRB 97^th Annual Meeting; January 7–11. Washington DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman K, Avery P, Bansal P, Boyles SD, Bujanovic P, Choudhary T, Clements L, Domnenko G, Fagnant D, Helsel J, et al. 2016. Implications of connected and automated vehicles on the safety and operations of roadway networks: a final report. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn A, De Ceunynck T, Karlsson C, Svensson Å, Daniels S. 2017. In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator. Accid Anal Prev. 98:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Wagner P. 2019. Impacts of gradual automated vehicle penetration on motorway operation: a comprehensive evaluation. Eur Transp Res Rev. 11. doi:10.1186/s12544-019-0375-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ahn S, Chung K, Ragland DR, Wang W, Yu JW. 2014. Surrogate safety measure for evaluating rear-end collision risk related to kinematic waves near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. Accid Anal Prev. 64:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi MS, Lord D, Dadashova B, Reza Mousavi S. 2020. Can autonomous vehicles enhance traffic safety at unsignalized intersections? International Conference on Transportation and Development. p. 194–206.
   Google Scholar
• Minderhoud MM, Bovy PHL. 2001. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accid Anal Prev. 33(1):89–97. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morando MM, Tian Q, Truong LT, Vu HL. 2018. Studying the safety impact of autonomous vehicles using simulation-based surrogate safety measures. J Adv Transp. 2018:1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/6135183
   Google Scholar
• Nadimi N, Behbahani H, Shahbazi H. 2016. Calibration and validation of a new time-based surrogate safety measure using fuzzy inference system. J Traf Transport Eng (English Ed.). 3(1):51–58. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2015.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Papadoulis A, Quddus M, Imprialou M. 2019. Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways. Accid Anal Prev. 124:12–22. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell A, Meingast A, Schauer O. 2017. Trends in real-time traffic simulation. Transp Res Procedia. 25:1477–1484. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.175
   Google Scholar
• Pirdavani A, Brijs T, Bellemans T, Kochan B, Wets G. 2012. Application of different exposure measures in development of planning-level zonal crash prediction models. Transport Res Rec. 2280(1):145–153. doi:10.3141/2280-16
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Abdel-Aty M. 2018. Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles’ platooning on expressways. Accid Anal Prev. 117:381–391. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles, surface vehicle recommended practice. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Saffarzadeh M, Nadimi N, Naseralavi S, Mamdoohi AR. 2013. A general formulation for time-to-collision safety indicator. Proceed Instit Civil Eng – Transp. 166(5):294–304. doi:10.1680/tran.11.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha A, Chand S, Wijayaratna KP, Virdi N, Dixit V. 2020. Crash severity and rate evaluation of conventional vehicles in mixed fleets with connected and automated vehicles. Procedia Comput Sci. 170:688–695. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.170
   Google Scholar
• Tafidis P, Pirdavani A, Brijs T, Farah H. 2019. Can automated vehicles improve cyclist safety in urban areas? Safety. 5(3):57. doi:10.3390/safety5030057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibljas AD, Giuffre T, Surdonja S, Trubia S. 2018. Introduction of autonomous vehicles: roundabouts design and safety performance evaluation. Sustainability. 10(4). doi:10.3390/su10041060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virdi N, Grzybowska H, Waller ST, Dixit V. 2019. A safety assessment of mixed fleets with connected and autonomous vehicles using the surrogate safety assessment module. Accid Anal Prev. 131:95–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali B, Khattak AJ, Bozdogan H, Kamrani M. 2018. How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian heterogeneity-based analysis of instrumented vehicles data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 92:504–524. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H, Tanin E, Karunasekera S, Qi J, Zhang R, Kulik L, Ramamohanarao K. 2019. Quantifying the impact of autonomous vehicles using microscopic simulations. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yang D, Xie K, Ozbay K, Yang H. 2021. Fusing crash data and surrogate safety measures for safety assessment: Development of a structural equation model with conditional autoregressive spatial effect and random parameters. Accid Anal Prev. 152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Tak S, Park M, Yeo H. 2019. Impact of autonomous-vehicle-only lanes in mixed traffic conditions. Transport Res Rec. 2673(9):430–439. doi:10.1177/0361198119847475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wu K, Cheng M, Yang M, Cheng Y, Li S. 2020. Safety evaluation for connected and autonomous vehicles’ exclusive lanes considering penetrate ratios and impact of trucks using surrogate safety measures. J Adv Transp. 2020. doi:10.1155/2020/5847814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Sayed T, Mannering F. 2021. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review of analytic methods and future directions. Anal Methods Accid Res. 29. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2020.100142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Krause S. 2019. Analysis of the impact of automated lane changing behavior on the capacity and safety of merge segments. Transp Res Procedia. 41:48–51. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.009
   Google Scholar