Drive in the Moment: An evaluation of a web-based tool designed to reduce smartphone use among young drivers

References

• Australian Automobile Association [AAA]. 2020a. Drive in the moment: comparative analysis, Australian drivers. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://www.driveinthemoment.com.au/knowledge-centre/.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Automobile Association [AAA]. 2020b. Drive in the moment: technical summary. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://www.driveinthemoment.com.au/knowledge-centre/.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. 2022. Causes of death. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-expectancy-death/deaths-in-australia/contents/leading-causes-of-death.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Amireault S. 2013. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev. 7(1):23–54. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.560095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster SE, Elliott MA, McCartan R, McGregor B, Kelly SW. 2016. Conditional or unconditional? The effects of implementation intentions on driver behavior. J Exp Psychol Appl. 22(1):124–133. doi:10.1037/xap0000072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PM, George AM, Rickwood D. 2019. Perceived risk and anticipated regret as factors predicting intentions to text while driving among young adults. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 62:339–348. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PM, George AM, Rickwood DJ. 2021. Rash impulsivity, reward seeking and fear of missing out as predictors of texting while driving: indirect effects via mobile phone involvement. Personality Individual Differ. 171:110492. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics [BITRE]. 2022. Road Trauma Australia 2021 statistical summary. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/ongoing/road_deaths_australia_annual_summaries.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2017. Media consumer survey 2017. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/deloitte-au-tmt-mobile-consumer-survey-2017-211117-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Guo F, Lee S, Antin JF, Perez M, Buchanan-King M, Hankey J. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(10):2636–2641. doi:10.1073/pnas.1513271113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott MA, Armitage CJ. 2006. Effects of implementation intentions on the self-reported frequency of drivers’ compliance with speed limits. J Exp Psychol Appl. 12(2):108–117. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott MA, Paterson A, Orr S, Marshall C, Wood C, Toye M, Wilson C. 2021. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce drivers’ use of mobile phones while driving. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 78:381–397. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott MA, Thomson JA. 2010. The social cognitive determinants of offending drivers’ speeding behaviour. Accid Anal Prev. 42(6):1595–1605. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauld CS, Lewis I, White KM. 2014. Concealing their communication: exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers’ intentions and engagement in concealed texting. Accid Anal Prev. 62:285–293. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauld CS, Watson B, Lewis I, White L, Pammer K. 2021. An exploration of the effectiveness of in-person and online versions of the induced hypocrisy paradigm to reduce smartphone use among young drivers. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 82:462–474. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George AM, Brown PM, Scholz B, Scott-Parker B, Rickwood D. 2018. “I need to skip a song because it sucks”: Exploring mobile phone use while driving among young adults. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 58:382–391. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM, Schaal B. 1998. Metacognition in Action: the Importance of Implementation Intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2(2):124–136. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 38:69–119. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. 1990. Action phases and mind sets. In: Higgins T, Sorrentino JR, editors. The handbook of motivation and cognition. New York (NY): Guilford Press; p. 53–92.
   Google Scholar
• Harbeck EL, Glendon AI. 2018. Driver prototypes and behavioral willingness: young driver risk perception and reported engagement in risky driving. J Saf Res. 66:195–204. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaviani F, Young KL, Robards B, Koppel S. 2021. “Like it’s wrong, but it’s not that wrong:” Exploring the normalization of risk-compensatory strategies among young drivers engaging in illegal smartphone use. J Safety Res. 78:292–302. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller L, Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. 2020. Changing behaviour using the model of action phases. In: hagger M, Cameron LD, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T, editors. The handbook of behaviour change. New York (NY): cambridge University Press. p. 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado LY, Flaherty MR. 2022. Intervening at the fingertips: a text-based approach to mitigating texting while driving [Editorial. J Adolesc Health. 71(4):381–382. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.06.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mostyn-Sullivan B, George AM, Brown PM. 2021. Impulsivity facets and mobile phone use while driving: indirect effects via mobile phone involvement. Accid Anal Prev. 150:105907. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemme HE, White KM. 2010. Texting while driving: psychosocial influences on young people’s texting intentions and behaivour. Accid Anal Prev. 42(4):1257–1265. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuroth LM, Galos D, Li L, Zhao S, Zhu M. 2021. Driving contradictions: behaviors and attitudes regarding handheld and hands-free cellphone use while driving among young drivers. Inj Epidemiol. 8(1):18. doi:10.1186/s40621-021-00312-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen-Phuoc DQ, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Ngoc Su D, De Gruyter C, Nguyen T. 2020. Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: the effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk. Accid Anal Prev. 143:105592. 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara R, Kotze J. 2010. Do not log-transform count data. In: Nature Precedings. doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4136.1.
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Nandavar S, Watson B, Haque MD White K, McLaren T, Newland C, O’Donnell K. 2019. Benchmarking distracted driving against other key risky driving behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Australasian Road Safety Conference. https://acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2019/JACRS-D-19-00168-Oviedo-Trespalacios.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson M, Hamilton K. 2014. Investigating driver willingness to drive through flooded waterways. Accid Anal Prev. 72:382–390. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh R, Srinath R, Sasikumar R, Subin B. 2017. Modeling safety risk perception due to mobile phone distraction among four wheeler drivers. IATSS Res. 41(1):30–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus T. 2019. Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: a review of the literature. Front Commun. 4:1–12. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056 10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes RE, Grant S, de Bruijn G-J. 2020. Planning and implementation intention intervention. In: Hagger M, Cameron LD, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T, editors. The handbook of behaviour change. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 572–585.
   Google Scholar
• Suffoletto B, Pacella-LaBarbara ML, Huber J, Kit Delgado M, McDonald C. 2022. Effectiveness of a text message intervention to reduce texting while driving among targeted young adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 71(4):423–431. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Transport for NSW. 2019. Centre for road safety: know the rules. [accessed 2022 Sept 21]. https://roadsafety.transport.nsw.gov.au/aboutthecentre/strategies/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• VicRoads. 2021. Mobile phones, technology and driving [accessed 2023 Feb 22]. https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/safety-and-road-rules/driver-safety/mobile-phones-and-driving.
   Google Scholar
• Vilà I, Carrero I, Redondo R. 2017. Reducing fat intake using implementation intentions: a meta-analytic review. Br J Health Psychol. 22(2):281–294. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh SP, White KM, Hyde MK, Watson B. 2008. Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 40(6):1893–1900. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson B, Nandavar S, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Lewis I, White K, Ho B, Gauld G. 2020. Distracted driving program: project 1, final full report. Brisbane. Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation [WHO]. 2022. Road traffic injuries fact sheet. [accessed 2022 Sept 21]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries
   Google Scholar