Repositioning forward-leaning passengers by seatbelt pre-pretensioning

References

• Benson BR, Smith GC, Kent RW, Monson CR. 1996. Effect of seat stiffness in out-of-position occupant response in rear-end collisions. SAE transactions. 1958–1971
   Google Scholar
• Brännström M, Coelingh E, Sjöberg J. 2014. Decision-making on when to brake and when to steer to avoid a collision. Int J Veh Saf. 7(1):87–106. doi:10.1504/IJVS.2014.058243.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Johnson D, Gayzik FS. 2019. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(8):832–837. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1655733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari G, Brolin K, Bråse D, Pipkorn B, Svanberg B, Jakobsson L, Davidsson J. 2018. Passenger kinematics in Lane change and Lane change with Braking Manoeuvres using two belt configurations: standard and reversible pre-pretensioner. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Graci V, Griffith M, Seacrist T, Brase D, Mishra E, Pipkorn B, Lubbe N, Arbogast K. 2022a. Bracing strategies in forward leaning occupants: the effect of seat-belt pre-pretension and a startle warning during braking acceleration. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Graci V, Griffith M, Seacrist T, Brase D, Mishra E, Pipkorn B, Lubbe N, Arbogast KB. 2022b. Repositioning forward-leaning vehicle occupants with a pre-pretensioner belt and a startle-based warning in pre-crash scenarios. Traffic Inj Prev. 2022:1–6. doi:10.1080/15389588.2022.2115294.
   Google Scholar
• Graci V, Maltenfort M, Schneider M, Griffith M, Seacrist T, Arbogast KB. 2021. Quantitative characterization of AEB pulses across the modern fleet. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(sup1):S62–S67. doi:10.1080/15389588.2021.1961227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koppel S, Jiménez Octavio J, Bohman K, et al. 2019. Seating configuration and position preferences in fully automated vehicles. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup2):S103–S109. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1625336.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson E, Iraeus J, Fice J, Pipkorn B, Jakobsson L, Brynskog E, Brolin K, Davidsson J. 2019. Active human body model predictions compared to volunteer response in experiments with braking, lane change, and combined manoeuvres. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Leledakis A, Östh J, Davidsson J, Jakobsson L. 2021. The influence of car passengers’ sitting postures in intersection crashes. Accid Anal & Prev. 157:106170. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106170.
   Google Scholar
• Lindman M, Ödblom A, Bergvall E, Eidehall A, Svanberg B, Lukaszewicz T. 2010. Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality. 4th International Conference on Expert Symposium on Accident Research. Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mages M, Seyffert M, Class U. 2011. Analysis of the pre-crash benefit of reversible belt pre-pretensioning in different accident scenarios. Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on The Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference. Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdinia I, Khattak AJ, Mohsena Haque M. 2022. How effective are pedestrian crash prevention systems in improving pedestrian safety? Harnessing large-scale experimental data. Accid Anal Prev. 171:106669. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Elrofai H, Broos J, van Hassel E. 2013. Evaluation of an active multi-body human model for braking and frontal crash events. Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on The Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference. Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra E, Mroz K, Pipkorn B, Lubbe N. 2022. Effects of automated emergency braking and seatbelt pre-pretensioning on occupant injury risks in high-severity frontal crashes. Front Future Transp. 3:883951. doi:10.3389/ffutr.2022.883951.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Gan S, Chen W, Zhou Q. 2020. Seating preferences in highly automated vehicles and occupant safety awareness: A national survey of Chinese perceptions. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(4):247–253. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1738013.
   Google Scholar
• Ólafsdóttir JM, Östh J, Brolin K. 2019. Modelling reflex recruitment of neck muscles in a finite element human body model for simulating omnidirectional head kinematics. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ólafsdóttir JM, Östh J, Davidsson J, Brolin K. 2013. Passenger kinematics and muscle responses in autonomous braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Östh J, Bohman K, Jakobsson L. 2020. Evaluation of kinematics and restraint interaction when repositioning a driver from a reclined to an upright position prior to frontal impact using active human body model simulations. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Östh J, Brolin K, Bråse D. 2015. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions. Traffic Inj Prev. 16:304–313. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.931949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östh J, Larsson E, Jakobsson L. 2022. Human body model muscle activation influence on crash response. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference. Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Östling M, Daddetta GA, Lubbe N, da Silva Zimmer A. 2022. SAFE-UP D4.2: architecture of Passive Safety Systems (No. D4.2). Proactive SAFEty systems and tools for a constantly UPgrading road environment. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5efaed43294db25b18168717/t/627e7860d8a9e0674d590787/1652455536483/SAFE-UP_Deliverable_D4.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, Wass J. 2017. Pre-crash triggered pretensioning of the seat belt for improved safety. Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference. Detroit, Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, Jakobsson L, Iraeus J, Östh J. 2023. The SAFER HBM – A Human Body Model For Seamless Integrated Occupant Analysis For All Road Users. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Subit D, Donlon JP, Kent RW. 2015. Development of a computational framework to adjust the pre-impact spine posture of a whole-body model based on cadaver tests data. J Biomech. 48(4):636–643. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.050.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins DH. 1983. Anthropometric specifications for mid-sized male dummy, volume 2, and for small female and large male dummies, volume 3. Report No. UMTR I -83-53-2. Available online: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/260/72269.0001.001.pdf?sequence=2
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones ML, Park BKD, Hallman JJ, Sherony R. 2018. Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S70–S77. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1481957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones ML, Hallman JJ. 2020. Prevalence of non-nominal seat positions and postures among front-seat passengers. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(sup1):S7–S12. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1793971.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones MH, Park BK. 2021. Occupant dynamics during crash avoidance maneuvers. United States. Department of Transportation. Report No. UMTRI-2020-10. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Feb 1. doi:10.7302/1700.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling S, Soni A, Hinrichs H, Verheyen C, Grikschat M, Eickhoff B, Lucht A, Cirstea A. 2021. Coupling feedback control loop-based model in Simulink to finite element model in LS-Dyna: application to reposition forward leaning occupant to upright posture. Proceedings of the 13th European LS-DYNA Conference. Ulm, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeneburg R, Breitling T. 2005. Enhancement of active and passive safety by future PRE-SAFE® systems. Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference On The Enhanced Safety Of Vehicles (ESV) Conference. Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzhüttl F, Liers H. 2019. Calculation of the Point of No Return (PONR) From Real-World Accidents. Proceedings of the 26th International Technical Conference On The Enhanced Safety Of Vehicles (Esv) Conference. Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman I. 2016. Safety for children in cars: focus on three point seatbelts in emergency events. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Straßburger P, Grotz B, Heiß S, Arbter B, Hachmann K, Metzger J, Ocelić N. 2023. Predictive safety: towards holistic top-down systems engineering for pre-crash systems. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference. Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS, Burnett RA, James MB. 2009. Influence of Seating Position on Dummy Responses with ABTS Seats in Severe Rear Impacts. SAE Technical Paper. doi:10.4271/2009-01-0250.
   Google Scholar
• Weller G, Czepulowski O, Diwischek L, Hoffmann F, Miller T, Schnabl R, Sprongl P. 2022. Kontrollierbarkeit und Akzeptanz einer unvorhergesehenen, reversiblen Hochleistungsgurtstraffung. in Fahrzeugsicherheit 2022 Auf dem Weg zur Fahrzeugsicherheit 2030, VDI-Berichte. VDI Wissensforum GmbH. Germany: Dusseldorf. doi:10.51202/9783181023877.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang LL, Chen L, Vertiz A, Balci R. 2004. Survey of Front Passenger Posture Usage in Passenger Vehicles. SAE Technical Paper; No. 2004-01-0845. doi:10.4271/2004-01-0845.
   Google Scholar