Promoting pedestrian safety in Bangladesh: Identifying factors for drivers’ yielding behavior at designated crossings using behavior change theories

References

• Adriaanse MA, Gollwitzer PM, De Ridder DT, De Wit JB, Kroese FM. 2011. Breaking habits with implementation intentions: a test of underlying processes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 37(4):502–513. doi:10.1177/0146167211399102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Ahmed B, Hainin MR. 2014. Road traffic accident characteristics in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Jurnal Teknologi. 71(3):75–82. doi:10.11113/jt.v71.3763.
   Google Scholar
• Anciaes P, Di Guardo G, Jones P. 2020. Factors explaining driver yielding behaviour towards pedestrians at courtesy crossings. Transpor Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 73:453–469. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenoso A, Beckmann J. 2005. The safety of vulnerable road users in the southern, eastern and central European countries. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council.
   Google Scholar
• Avinash C, Jiten S, Arkatkar S, Gaurang J, Manoranjan P. 2019. Evaluation of pedestrian safety margin at mid-block crosswalks in India. Saf Sci. 119:188–198. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awang ZH. 2010. Research methodology for business & social science. Selangor, Malaysia: University Publication Centre (UPENA), UiTM.
   Google Scholar
• Bandini S, Crociani L, Gorrini A, Vizzari G. 2014. Empirical investigation on pedestrian dynamics in presence of groups: a real world case study. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Bhalla K, Shotten M. 2019. Building road safety institutions in low-and middle-income countries: the case of Argentina. Health Syst Reform. 5(2):121–133. doi:10.1080/23288604.2019.1565061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund GM, Åberg L. 2005. Driver behaviour in intersections: formal and informal traffic rules. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 8(3):239–253. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. 1995. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, editors. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. American Psychological Association. p. 99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. 2012. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Sci. 7(1):1–17. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. 2014. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VLP. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Delhomme P, De Dobbeleer W, Forward S, Simões A. 2009. Manual for designing, implementing, and evaluating road safety communication campaigns: part I. Campaigns and Awareness Raising Strategies in Traffic Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Ding T, Wang S, Xi J, Zheng L, Wang Q. 2015. Psychology-based research on unsafe behavior by pedestrians when crossing the street. Adv Mech Eng. 7(1):203867. doi:10.1155/2014/203867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk RF, Miller NB. 1992. A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fred Wegman CG. 2006. Speed management: enforcement and new technologies. The Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fuest T, Sorokin L, Bellem H, Bengler K. 2017. Taxonomy of traffic situations for the interaction between automated vehicles and human road users. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. p. 708–719.
   Google Scholar
• Fylan F. 2017. Using Behaviour Change Techniques: guidance for the road safety community. RAC Foundation Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenbeld C. 2007. SWOV Fact Sheet, Fear Based Information Campaigns.
   Google Scholar
• iRAP. 2013. International Road assessment Programme Technical Report, ADB Road safety programme.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. 2020. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ. 84(1):7120. doi:10.5688/ajpe7120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadoya Y, Watanapongvanich S, Khan MSR. 2021. How is emotion associated with driving speed? A study on taxi drivers in Japan. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 79:205–216. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellermann K, Cole T. 1994. Classifying compliance gaining messages: taxonomic disorder and strategic confusion. Commun Theory. 4(1):3–60. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00081.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. 2020. Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (“COM-B”). Br J Health Psychol. 25(3):474–501. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkowitz M, Blake RR, Mouton JS. 1955. Status factors in pedestrian violation of traffic signals. J Abnorm Psychol. 51(3):704–706. doi:10.1037/h0042000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, Tay R, White KM. 2007. The role of fear appeals in improving driver safety: a review of the effectiveness of fear-arousing (threat) appeals in road safety advertising. Inter J Behav Consult Ther. 3(2):203–222. doi:10.1037/h0100799.
   Google Scholar
• Lusthaus C. 1999. Enhancing organisational performance: a toolbox for self-assessment. IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• McIlroy RC, Plant KL, Jikyong U, Nam VH, Bunyasi B, Kokwaro GO, Wu J, Hoque MS, Preston JM, Stanton NA. 2019. Vulnerable road users in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: validation of a pedestrian questionnaire. Accid Anal Prev. 131:80–94. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Atkins L, West R. 2014. The behaviour change wheel. Silverback Publishing. (A guide to designing interventions 1st ed Great Britain).
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterizing and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci. 6(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag D, Bhaduri E, Kumar GP, Goswami AK. 2020. Assessment of relationships between user satisfaction, physical environment, and user behaviour in pedestrian infrastructure. Transp Res Procedia. 48:2343–2363. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.284.
   Google Scholar
• Plutchik R. 1980. Plutchik’s wheel of emotions. https://www researchgate net/publication/234005320_Discovering_Basic_Emotion_Sets_via_Semantic_Clustering_on_a_TwitterCorpus/figures
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli A, Kotseruba I, Tsotsos JK. 2017. Agreeing to cross: how drivers and pedestrians communicate. In: 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli A, Tsotsos JK. 2020. Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: a Survey of Theory and Practice. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 21(3):900–918. doi:10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retting R. 2017. Pedestrian traffic fatalities by state.
   Google Scholar
• Sarwar MT, Fountas G, Bentley C, Anastasopoulos PC, Blatt A, Pierowicz J, Majka K, Limoges R. 2017. Preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of high-visibility crosswalks on pedestrian safety using crash surrogates. Transport Res Record. 2659(1):182–191. doi:10.3141/2659-20.
   Google Scholar
• Sheykhfard A, Haghighi F. 2019. Performance analysis of urban drivers encountering pedestrian. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 62:160–174. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofroniou N, Hutcheson GD. 1999. The multivariate social scientist. SAGE. p. 1–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sucha M, Dostal D, Risser RJAA. 2017. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accid Anal Prev. 102:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Bury M, Campling N, Carter S, Garfied S, Newbould J, Rennie T. 2006. A Review of the use of the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) to study and predict health related behaviour change.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan HO, Elmorssy M, Aksoy G. 2019. Pedestrian crossing behavior at midblock crosswalks. J Safety Res. 71:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2020. Delivering Road Safety in Bangladesh: leadership Priorities and Initiatives to 2030.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari G. 2020. Progress in pedestrian safety research. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 27(1):35–43. doi:10.1080/17457300.2020.1720255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varisco TJ, Downs CG, Rathburn KR, Fleming ML, Thornton JD. 2020. Applying the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model to identify opportunities to increase pharmacist comfort dispensing naloxone in Texas: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Drug Policy. 83:102827. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb TL, Sniehotta FF, Michie S. 2010. Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours. Addiction. 105(11):1879–1892. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03028.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West R, Michie S, Chadwick P, Atkins, L, Fabiana. 2020. Achieving behaviour change, A guide for national government. UK.
   Google Scholar
• Witte K. 1998. Theory-based interventions and evaluations of outreach efforts. Research review National Network of Libraries of Medicine Pacific Northwest Region, Outreach Evaluation Resource Centre, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Wittink R. 2001. Promotion of mobility and safety of vulnerable road users.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang X, Wu C. 2014. Pedestrian gestures increase driver yielding at uncontrolled mid-block road crossings. Accid Anal Prev. 70:235–244. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar