Potential of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning for Learners with Different Learning Styles

References

• Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1990). The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly, 14, 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1984). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspective on mathematical development. Educational Psychology, 76, 1051–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Coggins, C. C. (1988). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. (1990). Psychological factors and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 10–24.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, D. R. (1998). Taking instruction online: The art of delivery. CSS Journal [Online serial], 8(2). Available: www.cssjournal.com/everett.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C., & Boverie, P. E. (1993, November). Impact of learning styles on instructional design for distance education. Paper presented at the World Conference of the International Council of Distance Education, Bangkok, Thailand. (ERIC No. ED 359 926)
   Google Scholar
• Hara N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a Web-based distance education course: A taboo topic in the discourse [Online document]. Available: www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/wp00-01.html.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornwaite, C. (1999, January). Collaborative work networks among distributed learners. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [Online document]. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Available: http://dlib.computer.org/conferen/hicss/0001/pdf/00011023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hinn, D. H., Kanfer, A., & Wang, X. C. (2000, October/November). Evaluating online learning initiatives from multiple perspectives. Presented at the American Evaluation Association (AEA) annual conference, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T. E., Frederick, F. J., & Chung, M. L. (1994). Effects of learner cognitive styles and metacognitive tools on information acquisition paths and learning in hyperspace environments. In M. R. Simonson, M. J. Maushak, & K. L. Abu-Omar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 291–308). Washington, DC: Association for Education Communications and Technology. (ERIC No. ED 373 721)
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jegede, O. J., Fraser, B., & Curtin, D. F. (1995). The development and validation of a distance and open learning environment scale. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 90–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1985). Cooperative learning: One key to computer-assisted learning. The Computing Teacher, 13, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (1999). Comparative analysis of online vs. face-to-face instruction [Online document]. Available: www.outreach.uiuc.edu/hre/public/comparison.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, A., Thakkar, U., Moore, J., & Michaels, J. (1999). Alliance prototype distributed learning environment: Emerging technologies for science, education and business. International Journal of Educational Technology [Online serial], 1(2). Available: www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n2/kanfer/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J., & Guzdial, M. (1996). Effects with and of CSCL: Tracking learning in a new paradigm. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 307–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, R. E. (1992). Relationship of learning style to the effectiveness and acceptance of interactive video instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19(1), 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moldafsky, N. I., & Kwon, I. (1994). Attributes affecting computer-aided decision making: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(3), 299–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mory, E., Gambill, L., & Browning, J. B. (1998, March). Instruction on the Web: The online student’s perspective. Paper presented at SITE 98: Society of Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• NCSA technology research group [Online document]. (1999). Urbana, IL: National Center for Supercomputing Applications. Available: www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/edu/trg.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., & Robey, D. (1991). Learning style and the efficacy of computer training methods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2), 157–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, R. R., Veres, III, J. G., Watson, P. & Buckner, K. E. (1986). The reliability and classification stability of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 753–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin R. E. (1989). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks [Online serial], 2(1). Available: www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln_vol2issue1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, M. M, Karolick, D. M., Nielsen, M. C., Elder, G. D., & Hawley, W. T. (1995). Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, B. (1995). Increasing the effectiveness of university/college instruction: Integrating the results of learning style research into course design and delivery. In R. R. Sims & S. J. Sims (Eds.), The importance of learning styles: Understanding the implications for learning, course design, and education (pp. 49–67). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar