Distributed Cognition

References

• Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational. Behavior, 22, 195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1998). Learning from distributed theories of intelligence. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. (1996). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2006). The role of agency in distributed cognitive systems. Philosophy of Science, 73, 710–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought. Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1998). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. M. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Mac-Millan.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls. Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 165–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and Instruction, 8(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoie, S. P. (1993). Cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Individual differences in spatial ability: Developing technologies to increase strategy awareness and skills. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., & Light, P. (Eds.). (1999)). Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Bera, S. (2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Tapia, J., & Whitmore, K. F. (1993). Living knowledge: The social distribution of cultural resources for thinking. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 139–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using computers to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Levine J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991)). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (1997). A brief introduction to distributed cognition. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/yrogers/papers/dcog/dcog-brief-intro.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2006) Distributed Cognition and Communication. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd ed. (pp. 181–202). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Saljo, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1992). New challenges for educational research: Studying the individual within learning environments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent Technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Steketee, C. (2006). Modelling ICT integration in teacher education courses using distributed cognition as framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 126–144.
   Google Scholar
• Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Multimedia resources to bridge the praxis gap: Modeling practice in elementary science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(3), 349–375.
   Google Scholar
• Wijekumar K. J., Meyer, B. J. F., Wagoner, D., & Ferguson, L. (2006). Technology affordances: The ’real story’ in research with K—12 and undergraduate learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar