Professional Development for Information Communication Technology Integration

References

• Anderson, T. (2005). Bibliography of design-based research—theory & description. Canadian Institute of Distance Education. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://cider.athabascau.ca/CIDERSIGs/DesignBasedSIG/dbrreferences.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. Information Society, 19(1), 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (2005). Design research: The way forward. Education Canada, 46(1), 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge era. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, S. (2003). Does the use of ICT affect quality in learning science at key stage 3? Studies in Teaching and Learning, 1, 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). (2005). The BECTA review: Evidence on the progress of ICT in education. ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/becta_review_feb05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, A., Broe, L., Drewsen, U. M., & Spenceley, L. H. (2000). Organisation for economic co-operation and development/centre for educational research and innovation, information communication technology and the quality of learning programme. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/25/2737085.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, L., & Keown, P. (2006a). Communities of practice and professional development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(2), 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, L., & Keown, P. (2006b). Communities of practice and the professional development of geography teachers. Geography, 91(2), 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra-Handa, M. (2001). Leading academic change—through connective leadership and learning. In C. Crawford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price & R. Weber (Eds.), Society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2001 (pp. 488–493). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Webb, M., Abbott, C., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature. ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/ict_pedagogy_summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttance, P. (2001). School innovation: Pathway to the knowledge society. 2003, from http://www.dest.gov.au/schools/Publications/2001/innovation/summary.htm
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3), 391–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, D. P. (1993). Computers in schools and universities in the United States of America. Educational Technology, 33(9), 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Figg, C. B. (2000). Relationships between selected elementary teachers’ beliefs and educational technology use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://www.figg.com/phd/Dissertation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Toronto: Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., Oberg, D., & Pelz, R. (1999). Internet use in Alberta schools: A multi-phase study. Retrieved February 01, 2003, from http://www.carleton.ca/amtec99/program5.html
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D. (2000). Backs to the wall: Supporting teacher professional development with technology. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://evnet-ntl.momaster.ca/network/workingpapers/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., et al. (2002). Impact 2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Retrieved October, 2005, from http://www.becta.org/uk/page_documents/research/ImpaCT2_strand1_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haughey, M. (2002). Canadian research on information and communications technologies: A state of the field. Retrieved November 15, 2002, from http://www.cesc.ca/pceradocs/2002/papers/MHaughey_OEN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2004). Sustainability and evolution of ICT-supported classroom practice: Short report to BECTA/DFES. Retrieved May, 2006, from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/bursaries05/sustainability_evolution.doc
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 155–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2004). Rethinking the concept of community of practice in relation to schoolteachers’ workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(2), 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Chee, T. S., Hedberg, J. G., & Seng, K. T. (2005). A framework for fostering a community of practice: Scaffolding learners through an evolving continuum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkpen, K. M., Ho-Ching, W., Kuederle, O., Scott, S., & Shoemaker, G. (1999). ’This is fun! We’re all best friends and we’re all playing’: Supporting children’s synchronous collaboration. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference ’99, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K. (2005). How design experiments can inform teaching and learning: Teacher-researchers as collaborators in educational research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(4), 213–217.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Lai, K. W. (2007). Online communities of practice in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Laferrière, T., Lamon, M., & Chan, C. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development. Teaching Education, 17(1), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R. J. (2006a). Community of practice: A professional development option for learner-centered information communication technology integration. Manuscript submitted, Educational Research Technology and Development.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R. J. (2006b). In what ways do teacher attitude, professional development and leadership affect ICT integration? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Niesz, T. (2007). Why teacher networks (can) work. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(8), 605–610.
   Google Scholar
• O’Haire, N. (2003). Teachers’ perspectives on technology. Horizons. Retrieved October, 2005, from http://www.ctf-fce.ca/bilingual/publication/horizons/3/008teachersperspectives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orrill, C. H. (2001). Building technology-based, learner-centered classrooms: The evolution of a professional development framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J., McHugh, G., & Allaway, D. (2003). The motivational effect of ICT on pupils. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/rr523new.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pisapia, J. R., Knutson, K., & Coukos, E. D. (1999). The impact of computers on student performance and teacher behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association, Deerfield Beach, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 438323).
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGUILE (Biology guided inquiry learning environment): Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1992). The agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process. Teaching and Teacher Development, 8(3), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/learning_return.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (1999). Professional development and learning technologies: Needs, issues, trends and activities. Research report for Human Resources Development Canada. Retrieved May, 2002, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/hip/lld/olt/Skills_Development/OLTResearch/Professional_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ronnkvist, A. M., Dexter, S. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2000). Technology support: Its depth, breadth and impact in America’s schools. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/technology-support/report_5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2003). The knowledge society network (KSN): Toward an expert society for democratizing knowledge. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 63–66.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36, 37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sigalés, C., & Mominó, J. M. (2004). School in the network society: The internet in the area of nonuniveristy education. Research report for the Internet Interdisciplinary Institute. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.uoc.edu/in3/pic/eng/pdf/PIC_Escoles_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, G. (1995). Planning for technology. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(1), 66–67.
   Google Scholar
• Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: What makes the difference. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiessen, E., & Ward, D. (1997). Collaboration by design: Context, structure and medium. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(2), 175–198.
   Google Scholar
• Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: Information and communication technology, professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 426–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivienne, B., & Marie, B. (2005). Developing and sustaining professional dialogue about teaching and learning in schools. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbles, T. (2007). Do we know a community of practice when we see one? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Zolner, J. P. (1996). Moving the academic graveyard: The dynamics of curricular change. The Magazine of the Graduate Management Admission Council, 12(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar