360
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Hybrid Online Education

Identifying Integration Models Using Adventure Learning

&
Pages 23-41 | Published online: 21 Feb 2014

References

  • Apple (2007). Apple leadership in K–12 education. ACOT Library. Retrieved August 8, 2007 from http://www.apple.com/education/k12/leadership/acot/library.html
  • Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K–12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489–507.
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Dexter, S., Doering, A., & Riedel, E. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: A model and resources for educating teachers Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325–346.
  • Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education 27(2), 197–215.
  • Doering, A. (2007). Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-Journal of Online Education, 3(6). Available online. Retrieved on February, 22, 2008 from http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=342&action=article
  • Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 35(3), 342–361.
  • Doering, A, Hughes, J., & Scharber, C. (2007). Teaching and learning social studies online. In C. Cavanaugh, & R. Blomeyer (Eds.) What works in K–12 online learning (pp. 91–103). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
  • Doering, A., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (in press). Adventure learning: Educational, social, and technological affordances for collaborative hybrid distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education.
  • Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
  • Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
  • Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
  • Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2004). Levels of teaching: A taxonomy for instructional design. Educational Technology, 44(6), 14–22.
  • Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, C., & Skon, L. (1981). The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47–62.
  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kovalik, C. (2003). Reflections on a technology integration project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 73–90.
  • Lombard, R. H. (2004). Social studies and the Web today. Computers in the Schools, 21(3/4), 45–51.
  • Martorella, P. (1997). Technology and social studies, or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511–514.
  • McIsaac, M., & Gunawardena, C. (2001). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 403–437). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  • Moersch, C. (2007) Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTI) Framework. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from http://www.loticonnection.com
  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsly, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • National Research Council. (1999). Designing mathematics or science curriculum programs: A guide for using mathematics and science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Picciano A. G., & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 Online Learning: A Survey of U.S. School District Administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved, July 13, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/K-12_Online_Learning.pdf
  • Riedel, E., Doering, A., Scharber, C., & Ernst, D. (2007). “Timber for President”: Adventure learning and motivation. Paper presented at the 2007 meeting of the American Educational Research Association conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2005) A synthesis of new research on K–12 online learning. Retrieved July 12, 2007 from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/synthesis.pdf
  • Strudler N., & Wetzel, K. (1999) Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63–83.
  • Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). E-mail overload: Exploring personal information management of e-mail. In M. Tauber, (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 276–283), April 13–18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers’ perspective of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311–333.
  • Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.