A MUVE Towards PBL Writing

References

• Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. E. (1997). Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(6), 444–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the future of learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. (1996). The middle school experience: Effects on the math and science achievement of adolescents with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(March/April), 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2006). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: A framework for socio-scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Scott, B., Ingram-Goble, A., Goldstone, R., Zuiker, S., & Warren, S. J. (in press). Contextual embodiment as a curricular scaffold for transferable understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development. 53(1), 86–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Zuiker, S., Warren, S. J., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E. J., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, A. (1999). Intelligent agents as cognitive tools. Educational Technology, 39(2), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Baylor, A., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(1), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (Eds.). (2000)). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology 31(2), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, C. (2003). The art of interactive design: A euphonious and illuminating guide to building successful software. San Francisco: No Starch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., & Ruess, K. (2006). Designing for motivation and usability in a museum-based multi-user virtual environment. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~dedech/muvees/documents/AELppr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Denis, G., & Jouvelot, P. (2005). Motivation-driven educational game design: applying best practices to music education. Paper presented at the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. D. (2006). “Ninja Looting” for instructional design: The design challenges of creating a game-based learning environment. Paper presented at the ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(3), 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature [Electronic Version]. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4, 1–11. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://www.eduquery.com/jaet/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J., & Hanson-Smith, E. (Eds.). (1999)). CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Manalo, M., & Zhao, Y. (2004). I can do it better on the computer: The effects of technology-enabled scaffolding on young writers’ composition. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Entertainment Software Association. (2007). Facts and Research. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://theesa.com/facts/gamer_data.php_
   Google Scholar
• Fisch, S. M. (2005). Making educational computer games “educational.” Paper presented at the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children, Boulder, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational Research: An introduction (6th ed. Vol. I). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, J., Brown, C., & Arrighi, M. (1998). Interactive multimedia and Web-based learning: Similarities and differences. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction, (pp 47–58). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2005)). Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding the connections between transfer and student assessment. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Squire, K., & Tan, P. (2003). Entering the education arcade. A CM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. (2001). Best practices in corporate training and the role of aesthetics: Interviews with eight experts. Paper presented at the 2001 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer Personnel Research, San Diego, California. Available http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=371209.371239
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, F. (2003, March 28). Why the army shouldn’t be so surprised by Saddam’s moves. Slate war stories Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://slate.msn.com/id/2080814/
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1991). Writing-research, theory, and applications. Torrance, CA: Laredo Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Luchini, K., Michael, B., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. Paper presented at the CHI ’04 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE Design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macefield, R. (2007). Usability studies and the Hawthorne Effect. Journal of Usability Studies, 2(3), 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, W. J. (2003). Constructivism in the classroom: Epistemology, history, and empirical evidence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(3), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (2002). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Nieborg, D. B. (2005). Changing the rules of engagement: Tapping into the popular culture of America’s Army, the official U.S. Army computer game. Unpublished study, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, R. G. (2002). Strategies for the reluctant writer. Riverside, CA: RET Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samsonov, P., Pedersen, S., & Hill, C. (2006). Using problem-based learning software with at-risk students: A case study. Computers in Schools, 23(1/2), 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Carley, K., & Moon, I. C. (2005). Detailed comparison of America’s Army game and Unit of Action experiments. United States Army. Available http://cos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/CMU-ISRI-05-139.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (1997). Reading-writing relationships, thematic units, inquiry learning...in pursuit of effective integrated literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 51(1), 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, R. L., & Maehr, M. L. (1976). Toward the experimental analysis of “continuing motivation.” The Journal of Educational Research, 69, 319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, K. (2004). Replaying history. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University Bloomington. ISBN 9780496134908. DAI-A 65/11.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K., Giovanetto, L., Devane, B., & Durga, S. (2005). From users to designers: Building a self-organizing game-based learning environment. Tech Trends, 49(5), 34–42, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K., & Steinkuehler, C. (2005). Generating cyberculture/s: The case of Star Wars Galaxies. In D. Gibbs & K. L. Krause (Eds.), Cyberlines 2.0: Languages and cultures of the Internet (2nd ed.). Vol. 1, pp. 177–198). Albert Park, Australia: James Nicholas Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler, C. (2004). The literacy practices of massively multiplayer online gaming. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzun, H. (2004). Motivating learners in educational computer games. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Strategic Plan, 2002-2007. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/strat/plan2002-07/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waraich, A. (2004). Using narrative as a motivating device to teach binary arithmetic and logic gates. Paper presented at the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Leeds, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S. J. (2006). The impact of a multi-user virtual environment (MUVE) teacher instructional time, voluntary student writing practice, and student writing achievement. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
   Google Scholar