735
Views
127
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teacher Participation in Online Communities

Why Do Teachers Want to Participate in Self-generated Online Communities of K–12 Teachers?

&
Pages 279-303 | Published online: 21 Feb 2014

References

  • Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003). Emotions in organizations: A multi-level perspective. Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy, 2, 9–54.
  • Baek, E. (2002). A study of dynamic design dualities in a web-supported community of practice for teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
  • Barnett, M. (2002, April). Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved November 29, 2008 from http://www.inkido.indiana.edu/mikeb/papers/inprep/electronic_networks.pdf
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(5), 483–497.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  • Carr, N., & Chambers, D. P. (2006). Teacher professional learning in an online community: The experiences of the national quality schooling framework pilot project. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(2), 143–157.
  • Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York: Routledge.
  • Christophe, V., & Rimé, B. (1997). Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 37–54.
  • Daugherty, T., Lee, W.-N., Gangadharbatla, H., Kim, K., & Outhavong, S. (2005). Organizational virtual communities: Exploring motivations behind online panel participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 9. Retrieved July 24, 2008 from http://www.jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/daugherty.html
  • Ellis, D., Oldridge, R., & Vasconcelos, A. (2004). Community and virtual community. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 145–186.
  • Fiszer, E. P. (2004). How teachers learn best: An ongoing professional development model. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1056–1080.
  • Hew, K.F., & Hara, N. (2007). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 573–595.
  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
  • Hur, J., & Hara, N. (2007). Factors cultivating sustainable online communities for K—12 teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(3), 245–268.
  • Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Internet World Stats. Retrieved on December 12, 2007 from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats14.htm
  • Jones, A., & Preece, J. (2006). Online communities for teachers and lifelong learners: A framework for comparing similarities and identifying differences in communities of practice and communities of interest. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2—3), 112–137.
  • Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
  • Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., et al. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 10. Retrieved May 31, 2007 from http://www.jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/ling.html
  • Meho, L. I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Moore, J. A. (2003). The desire for and design of teacher professional development: A community of practice in the making? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating Online: Learning together in community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
  • Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Salmon, G. (1993). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19, 203–220.
  • Schoberth, T., Preece, J., & Heinzl, A., (2003). Online communities: A longitudinal analysis of communication activities. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA. Retrieved November 29, 2008 from http://www.ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1174576
  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 213–238.
  • Zhao, Y., & Rop, S. (2002). A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for inservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 6(2), 81–94.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.