A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Postsecondary Statistics Education

References

• *Aberson, C. L., Berger, D. E., Healy, M. R., & Romero, V. L. (2003). Evaluation of an interactive tutorial for teaching hypothesis testing concepts. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aberson,, C. L., Berger, D. E., Healy, M. R., Kyle, D. J., & Romero, V. L. (2000). Evaluation of an Internet tutorial for teaching the central limit theorem. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 289–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aberson, C. L., Berger, D. E., Healy, M. R., & Romero, V. L. (2002). An interactive tutorial for teaching statistical power. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–7. Retrieved February 28, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/aberson.html
   Google Scholar
• *Athey, S. (1987). A mentor system incorporating expertise to guide and teach statistical decision making. (Doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts, 48, 0238.
   Google Scholar
• *Basturk, R. (2005). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching introductory statistics. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 170–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Benedict, J. O., & Anderton, J. B. (2004). Applying the just-in-time teaching approach to teaching statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 31(3), 197–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bliwise, N. G. (2005). Web-based tutorials for teaching introductory statistics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 309–325.
   Google Scholar
• Bratz, A., & Sabolik, M. A. (2001). Computer and software use in teaching the beginning statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. W., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2004). Teaching statistics from a distance: What have we learned? International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• *Burruss, G. W., & Furlow, M. H. (2007). Teaching statistics visually: A quasi-experimental evaluation of teaching chi-square through computer tutorials. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(2), 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• *Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (1997). The effects of computers and calculators on male and female statistics achievement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 9, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. W. (1993). Reconsidering statistics education: A National Science Foundation Conference. Journal of Statistics Education, 1, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common X2 tests. Biometrics, 10, 417–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Collis, B., O’Berg, A., & Shera, W. (1988). An evaluation of computer-based instruction in statistical techniques for education and social work students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17, 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. (2009). Retreived October 20, 2009, from http://www.analysis.com
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, & J.C. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 1–18). New York: Russell Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA designs. (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Cybinski, P., & Selvanathan, S. (2005). Learning experience and learning effectiveness in undergraduate statistics: Modeling performance in traditional and flexible learning environments. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(2), 251–271.
   Google Scholar
• *Debord, K. A., Aruguete, M. S., & Muhlig, J. (2004). Are computer-assisted teaching methods effective? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dinkins, P. (1985). Development of a computer-assisted instruction courseware package in statistics and a comparative analysis of three management strategies. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• *Dimitrova, G., Persell, C. H., & Maisel, R. (1993). Using and evaluating ISEE, a new computer program for teaching sampling and statistical inference. Teaching Sociology, 21, 341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dixon, P. N., & Judd, W. A. (1977). A comparison of computer-managed instruction and lecture mode for teaching basic statistics. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 4(1), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• *Dorn, M. J. (1993). The effect of an interactive, problem-based HyperCard modular instruction on statistical reasoning. (Doctoral dissertation. Southern Illinois University of Carbondale, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 1–277.
   Google Scholar
• *Erwin, T. D., & Rieppi, R. (1999). Comparing multimedia and traditional approaches in undergraduate psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 26(1), 58–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating Web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quanatative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fusilier, M. R., & Kelly, E. P. (1985). An evaluation of computer-assisted instruction for learning business statistics. AEDS Journal. 18, 237–242.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (2002). First courses in statistical science: The status of educational reform efforts. Journal of Statistics Education, 10, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• *Gilligan, W. P. (1990). The use of computer statistical package in teaching a unit of descriptive statistics. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1–230.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud, G. (1997). Cooperative learning and statistics instruction. Journal of Statistics Education, 5, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Given-Larwin, K. H. (2004). The impact of computer-assisted instruction on student achievement in postsecondary statistics education: A meta-analysis. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Gonzalez, G. M., & Birch, M. A. (2000). Evaluating the instructional efficacy of computermediated interactive multimedia: Comparing three elementary statistics tutorial modules. Journal of Education Computing Research. 22, 411–430.
   Google Scholar
• *Grandzol, J.R. (2004). Teaching MBA statistics online: A pedagogically sound process approach. Journal of Education for Business, 3, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• *Gratz, Z. S., Volpe, G. D., & Kind, B. M. (1993). Attitudes and achievement in introductory psychological statistics classes: Traditional versus computer supported instruction. Proceeding of the Annual Conference on Undergraduate Teching of Psychology, Ellenville, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED365405).
   Google Scholar
• *Hall, R., Pilant, M, & Strader, R. (1999). The impact of Web-based instruction on performance in an applied statistics course. In D. A. Thomas (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology, (pp. 261–266). Chesapeake, VA: AACE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Harrington, D. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 9, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1986). Issues in meta-analysis. In E. Z. Zothkoph (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 13, 353–398. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, D. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analyses. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• *High, R. V. (1998). Some variables in relation to students’ choice of statistics classes: Traditional versus computer-supported instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427762).
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, S. C., & Christensen, H. B. (2002). Evaluating the impact of multimedia lectures on student learning and attitudes. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Developing a statistically literate society. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching of Statistics [CD-ROM] (pp. 1–6). Cape Town: International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. V. (1991). Statistics education: Improvements badly needed. The American Statistician, 45, 342–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hollowell, K. A., & Duch, B. J. (1991). Functions and statistics with computers at college level. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.336090).
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. (2003). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics education: A metaanalysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• *Hurlburt, R. T. (2001). Lectlets deliver content at a distance: Introductory statistics as a case study. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• *Jones, E. R. (1999). A comparison of an all Web-based class to a traditional class. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 1372–1377). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• *Katz, Y. F., & Yablon, Y. B. (2003). Online university learning: cognitive and affective perspectives. Campus Wide Information Systems, 20, 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• *Koch, C., & Gobell, J. (1999). A hypertext-based tutorial with links to the web for teaching statistics and research methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 7–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Lane, J. L., & Aleksic, M. (2002). Transforming elementary statistics to enhance student learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• *Lane, D. M., & Tang, Z. (2000). Effectiveness of simulation training on transfer of statistical concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Larwin, K., & Larwin, D. (2011). Evaluating the use of random distribution theory to introduce statistical inference concepts to business students. Journal of Education for Business, 86(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• *Lesser, L. M. (1998). Technology-rich standards-based statistics: Improving introductory statistics at the college level. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 25(7), 54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B., Kettenring, J., & Siegmund, D. (Ed.) (2004). Statistics: Challenges and opportunities for the 21^st century. NSF Report. Retrieved August 27, 2004, from http://www.amstat.org/news/nsf4Aug04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Madigan, E. (1991). An expert system as a study guide in an elementary statistics class and its effect on learning. (Doctoral Dissertations, Florida Institute of Technology UMI No. 9137077).
   Google Scholar
• *Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Improving learner performance with computer based programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McBride, A. B. (1996). Creating a critical thinking learning environment: Teaching statistics to social science undergraduates. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29, 517–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McClaren, C. H. (2004). A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• *Mills, J. D. (2004). Learning abstract statistics concepts using simulation. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(4), 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65, 123–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morris, E. (2001). The design and evaluation of Link: A computer-based learning system for correlation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morris, E. J., Joiner, R. & Scanlon, E. (2002). The contribution of computer-based activities to understanding statistics. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 18, 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Myers, K. N. (1989). An exploratory study of the effectiveness of computer graphics and simulations in a computer-student interactive environment in illustrating random sampling and the central limit theorem. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1–441.
   Google Scholar
• *Olsen, C. R. & Bozeman, W. C. (1988). Decision support systems: Applications in statistics and hypothesis testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20, 206–212.
   Google Scholar
• *Oswald, P.A. (1996). Classroom use of personal computers to teach statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 124–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Palocsay, S.W., & Stevens, S.P. (2008). A study of the effectiveness of Web-based homework in teaching undergraduate business statistics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 213–232.
   Google Scholar
• *Petta, N. A. (1999). The impact of Web-based class management system on student performance and attitudes in a quantitative statistics class. (Doctoral Dissertations, University of Nevada, UMI order no. ADG75-10784).
   Google Scholar
• *Porter, A., Griffiths, D., & Hedberg, J. (2003). From classroom to online teaching: Experiences in improving statistics education. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 7, 35–73.
   Google Scholar
• *Ragasa, C.Y. (2008). A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and traditional methods of teaching basic statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1), 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Raymondo, J. C. & Garrett, J. R. (1998). Assessing the introduction of a computer laboratory experience into a behavioral science statistics course. Teaching Sociology, 26, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Roiter, K., & Petocz, P. (1996). Introductory statistics courses: A new way of thinking. Journal of Statistics Education, 4, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• *Rosen, E. F., Feeney, B., & Petty, L. C. (1994). An introductory statistics class and examination using SPSS/PC. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26, 242–244.
   Google Scholar
• *Schutte, J.G. (1996). Virtual teaching in higher education: The new intellectual superhighway or just another traffic jam? Retrieved on September 5, 2004, from http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm
   Google Scholar
• *Skavaril, R. V. ( 1974). Computer-based instruction of introductory statistics. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• *Smith, B. (2003). Using and evaluating resampling simulations in SPSS and Excel. Teaching Sociology, 31, 276–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (1993). What’s missing in statistical education? The American Statistician, 47, 149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Song, P. W. (1992). The effect of using computer software and computer simulations to teach statistics and probability in a Korean college. University of Iowa, Doctoral Dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 9237014)
   Google Scholar
• *Spinelli, M. A. (2001). The use of technology in teaching business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• *Stephenson, W. R. (2001). Statistics at a distance. Journal of Statistics Education, 9, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• *Sterling, J., & Gray, M. W. (1991). The effect of simulation software on students’ attitudes and understanding in introductory statistics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10(4), 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Culture, instruction, and assessment. Comparative Education, 43(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stockburger, D. W. (1982). Evaluation of three simulation exercises in an introductory statistics course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 365–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• *Tsai, S. W., & Pohl, N. F. (1980). Computer-assisted instruction augmented with planned teacher/student contacts. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 120–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tubb, G. W. (1977). Current use of computers in the teaching of statistics. Paper presented at the meeting of the Computer Science and Statistics annual symposium, Gaithersbury, Maryland. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED432286).
   Google Scholar
• *Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., & Matthews, H. R. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 11, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• *Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ware, M. E., & Chastain, J. D. (1989). Computer-assisted statistical analysis: A teaching innovation? Teaching of Psychology, 16(4), 222–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wassertheil, S. (1969). Computer assistance in statistics. Improving College and University Teaching, 17(4), 264–266.
   Google Scholar
• *Weir, C. G., McManus, I. C., & Kiely, B. (1991). Evaluation of the teaching of statistical concepts by interactive experience with Monte Carlo simulations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wender, K., & Muehlboeck, J. (2003). Animated diagrams in teaching statistics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 255–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *White, S. L. ( 1986). Teaching introductory statistics: Hand calculations versus computer data analysis. California State University Doctoral Dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 1328044).
   Google Scholar
• *Wilmouth, J., & Wybraniec, J. (1998). Profits and pitfalls: Thoughts on using a laptop computer and presentation software to teach introductory social statistics. Teaching Sociology, 26(3), 166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, M. R. (1996). The challenges of teaching statistics to non-specialists. Journal of Statistics Education, 4, 1–12.
   Google Scholar