ICANREAD

References

• Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D., Lorch, E. P., & Milich, R. (2007). Comparing television use and reading in children with ADHD and non-referred children across two age groups. Media Psychology, 9(1), 447–472.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (p. 199–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. (2000). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (2009). Comprehension difficulties among struggling readers. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (p. 551–568). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Alptekin, C., & Ercetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 627–639.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (1993). Themes and directions of the National Reading Research Center (Perspectives in Reading Research, No. 1). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 261–327.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 452–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Big Universe Learning. (2011, January). An engaging online reading and writing community. Retrieved from http://www.biguniverse.com
   Google Scholar
• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castek, J., Bevans-Mangelson, J., & Goldstone, B. (2006). Reading adventures online: Five ways to introduce the new literacies of the Internet through children’s literature. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 714–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Reading Difficulties, 19(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chera, P., & Wood, C. (2003). Animated multimedia ’talking books’ can promote phonological awareness in children beginning to read. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Foster, A. (2005). Children’s and young people’s reading habits and preferences: The who, what, why, where and when. London: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. D., & Kiger, N. D. (2003). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2010). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Long-term effects of preschool teachers’ book readings on low-income children’s vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 374–384.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, K., & Tancock, S. (2003). Incentives: The effects on the reading motivation of fourth grade students. Reading Research and Instruction, 42(2), 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. (1995). Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1455–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 634–645.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49(7), 518–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H. (Eds.). (1990)). The psychology of learning and motivation: Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 583–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Alvermann, D. E. (Eds.). (1999)). Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (p. 403–422). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McGough, K., & Wigfield, A. (1994). Measuring reading activity: An inventory (Instructional Resource No. 4). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, A. C., & Sénéchal, M. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(1), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, S. L., & Shewry, C. S. (2002). Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory into Practice, 41, 102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlburt, R. T. (2003). Comprehending behavioral statistics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2006). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 248–259.
   Google Scholar
• Labbo, L. D., & Kuhn, M. R. (2000). Weaving chains of affect and cognition: A young child’s understanding of CD-ROM talking books. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 187–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladbrook, J. (2008). Teachers of digikids: Do they navigate the divide? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32(1), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM storybook features that influence reading behaviors. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R. (1981). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: Aspects of the development of competence (p.155-213). Hillsdale, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, Jr., D. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (p. 310–336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. B. (2000). Project LITT (Literacy Instruction Through Technology): Enhancing the reading skills of students with learning disabilities through hypermedia-based children’s literature (Final Report). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University, Department of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, J. A., Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Essential readings on motivation. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of influence of interactive CD-ROM storybooks. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(3), 263–276.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, K., & Wong, S. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(1), 934–956.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Stahl, S. A., Wardrop, J., & Linn, R. (1994). Effects of reading storybooks aloud to children. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1985). Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of Ontario. (2003). Early reading strategy: The report of the expert panel on early reading in Ontario. Toronto: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Muspratt, S., Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (Eds.). (1997)). Constructing critical literacies. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of the Teachers of English [NCTE]. (2007.) 21^st century literacies: A policy research brief. Retrieved September 1, 2011, from http://www.ncte.org/library/files/Publications/Newspaper/Chron1107ResearchBrief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, J., & Lehr, F. (Eds.). (1998)). Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ota, K. R., & DuPaul. G. J. (2002). Task performance and mathematics performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(1), 242–257.
   Google Scholar
• Pearman, C. (2008). Independent reading of CD-ROM storybooks: Measuring comprehension with oral retellings. Reading Teacher, 61(8), 594–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (1994). Commentary on California’s new English-language arts assessment. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (p.218-227). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2003) A “benign addition”? Research on ICT and pre-school children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructive responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In M. Boeaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (p. 651–685). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E. (1982). Question-answering strategies for children. The Reading Teacher, 36, 186–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (p. 375–407). New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V., Vandewater, E., & Wartella, A. (2003). Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Romeo, L. (2002). At-risk students: Learning to break through comprehension barriers. In C. Collins Block, L.B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction (p. 385–389). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos, K., Brueck, J., & Widman, S. (2009). Investigating analytic tools for e-book design in early literacy learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 218–240.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(6), 285–307.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning, what we know and what we don’t know. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (p. 91–104). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Segers, E., Takke, L., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Teacher-mediated versus computer-mediated storybook reading to children in native and multicultural kindergarten classrooms. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (1996). The paradox of case study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Randell, B., Nelley, E., & Giles, J. (2002). PM benchmark kit 2: An assessment resource for emergent-12 years. Southbank, Victoria: Nelson Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, K. (2004). Proof, practice, and promise: Comprehension strategy instruction in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 57(7), 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terblanche, L. (2002). Read-alouds: Do they enhance students’ ability to read? New York: New York City Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Census Bureau. (2009). Home computer access and Internet use. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Valmont, W. J. (2000). What do teachers do in technology-rich classrooms? In S. B. Wepner, W. J. Valmont, & R. Thurlow (Eds.), Linking literacy and technology: A guide for K-8 classrooms (p. 160–202). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleeck, A. (2008). Research on book-sharing: Another critical look. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wepner, S. B., & Ray, L. C. (2000). Using technology for reading development. In R. Thurlow, W. J. Valmont, & S. B. Wepner (Eds.), Linking literacy and technology. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray oral reading test (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, G. E., & Hay, I. (2004). Using imagery as a strategy to enhance students’ comprenension of read text. In B. A. Knight & W. Scott (Eds.), Learning difficulties: Multiple perspectives (p. 85–101). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Applied Social Research Methods) (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiers, J. (2004). Developing academic thinking skills in grades 6-12: A handbook of multiple intelligence activities. Newark, DE: International Reading
   Google Scholar