Teacher Perceptions of Parent Engagement at a Cyber High School

References

• Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents' decision making. Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 311–323. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.5.311-323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Cyber-truancy: Addressing issues of attendance in the digital age. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M., & Mulcahy, D. (2004). The role of mediating teachers in Newfoundland's new model of distance education. The Morning Watch, 32(1). Retrieved from http://www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/fall4/barbourmulcahy.htm
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 140–163. doi:10.1080/0090988032000064597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, E. W. (2009). An evaluation of familial involvements' influence on student achievement in K–12 virtual schooling. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). On-site and online facilitators: Current and future direction for research. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K–12 online and blended learning (pp. 325–346). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press. Retrieved from http://press.etc.cmu.edu/files/Handbook-Blended-Learning_Ferdig-Kennedy-etal_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2013). The nature of parental interactions in an online charter school. American Journal of Distance Education, 27, 40–55. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.754271
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793–806. doi:10.1111/bjet.12089
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Velasquez, A. (2013). Technology-mediated caring: Building relationships between students and instructors in online K–12 learning environments. In, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Advances on teaching: Vol. 18. Emotions in school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (pp. 183–202). Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-learning: What are the real implications for schools? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 6(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M., Brown, R., Diamond, D., Lowes, S., Powell, A., & van der Molen, J. (2009). Research committee issues brief: Examining communication and interaction in online teaching. Vienna, VA: iNacol. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/NACOL_QualityTeaching-lr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/751/1285
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., & Borup, J. (2014). An online high school “shepherding” program: Teacher roles and experiences mentoring online students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19(2), 119–136. doi:10.1177/0013124587019002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Freidhoff, J. R. (2015). Michigan's K–12 virtual learning effectiveness report 2013–2014. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute. Retrieved from http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/er_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Gill, B., Walsh, L., Wulsin, C. S., Matulewicz, H., Severn, V., Grau, E., & Kerwin, T. (2015). Inside online charter schools. Cambridge, MA: Walton Family Foundation and Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/∼/media/publications/pdfs/education/inside_online_charter_schools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Google Scholar
• Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1 & 2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/016/1/01611.HTML
   Google Scholar
• Hasler Waters, L. (2012). Exploring the experiences of learning coaches in a cyber charter school: A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (Accession number 3569079)
   Google Scholar
• Hasler-Waters, L. H., & Leong, P. (2014). Who is teaching? New roles for teachers and parents in cyber charter schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler-Waters, L., Menchaca, M. P., & Borup, J. (2014). Parental involvement in K–12 online and blended learning. In R. Ferdig, & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K–12 online and blended learning (pp. 303–323). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, S. T., Keijsers, L., Hale, W. W., & Meeus, W. (2009). Mind your own business! Longitudinal relations between perceived privacy invasion and adolescent-parent conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(4), 511–520. doi:10.1037/a0015426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children's education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97(2), 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). Final performance report for OERI grant # R305T010673: The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement. Retrieved from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/peabody/family-school/Reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Litke, D. (1998). Virtual schooling at the middle grades: A case study résumé. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Black, E., Algina, J., Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, K. (2010). The validation of one parental involvement measurement in virtual schooling. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 105–132.
   Google Scholar
• McNeal, R. B. (2012). Checking in or checking out? Investigating the parent involvement reactive hypothesis. Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 79–89. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.519410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miron, G., Gulosino, C., & Horvitz, B. (2014). Section III: Full time virtual schools. In A. Molnar (Ed.), Virtual schools in the U.S. 2014 (pp. 55–73). Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/virtual-2014-all-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2009). Teachers' perspectives on motivation in high school distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., Freeman, J., Stabler, M., & Schneidmiler, J. (2007). External evaluation of the Alabama ACCESS initiative phase 3 report. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from http://accessdl.state.al.us/2006Evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, J. G., Daddis, C., & Chuang, S. S. (2003). “Clean your room!”: A longitudinal investigation of adolescent-parent conflict and conflict resolution in middle-class African American families. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18(6), 631–650. doi:10.1177/0743558403254781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, C. (2012). Learning online at the K–12 level: A parent/guardian perspective. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(4), 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J. M., Johnson, T. E., & Young, P. A. (2015). An editorial on replication studies and scaling up efforts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 1–4. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9364-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. Learning. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Rise-of-K–12-Blended-Learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Supporting families and communities: Reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/faq/supporting-family.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2013). Caring in a technology-mediated online high school context. Distance Education, 34(1), 97–118. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, L. H. (2012). Exploring the experiences of learning coaches in a cyber charter school: A qualitative case study. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1347666490?accountid=4488.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, L. H., & Leong, P. (2011). New roles for the teacher and learning coach in blended learning for K–12. In T. Bastiaens & M. Edner (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2716–2725). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2013). Keeping pace with K–12 online and blended learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://kpk12.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/EEG_KP2013-lr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, C. (2003). Key ingredients to online learning: Adolescent students study in cyberspace–The nature of the study. International Journal on E-Learning, 2(3), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. doi:10.2307/258554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, S. (2013). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397. doi:10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transformative qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar