What's in It for Me? Incentives, Learning, and Completion in Massive Open Online Courses

References

• Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Journal of Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528–541. doi:10.1111/bjet.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? doi:10.2139/ssrn.2350964
   Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J. A., & Slate, J. R. (2002). Multimedia and the college of business: A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 186–205. doi:10.1080/15391523.2002.10782379
   Google Scholar
• Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Hobson Bryan, C. (2013). Turnitin systems: A deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229–248. doi:10.1080/15391523.2013.10782604
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Wilmington, NC: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, S., Williams, A. E., Warschauer, M., He, W., & O'Dowd, D. K. (2014). Influence of incentives on performance in a pre-college biology MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 99–112. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133–160. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 136–145. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Coffrin, C., de Barba, P., & Corrin, L. (2015). Predicting success: How learners' prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 136–140). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. Educause Review, 48(3), 62–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kolowich, S. (2013, July 8). A university's offer of credit for a MOOC gets no takers. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/A-Universitys-Offer-of-Credit/140131
   Google Scholar
• Kolwich, S. (2012). Who Takes MOOCs? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/05/early-demographic-data-hints-what-type-student-takes-mooc
   Google Scholar
• Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–640. doi:10.3102/0034654315617832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). MOOCocracy: The learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1013–1032. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9444-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. doi:10.1007/BF02295996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Zhu, S. (2013). Fair and equitable measurement of student learning in MOOCs: An introduction to item response theory, scale linking, and score equating. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students' patterns of engagement and course performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics [Computer software]. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.qualtrics.com
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. O., & Bonk, C. (2015). MOOCs: Redirecting the quest for quality higher education for all. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/110003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selingo, J. J. (2013). College (un)bound: The future of higher education and what it means for students. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. doi:10.1080/2194587X.2016.1159230
   Google Scholar
• Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., & Stich, A. E. (2016). Intended and unintended consequences of educational technology for social inequality. TechTrends, 60(6), 598–605. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0109-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., Stich, A. E., Gill, A., Hong, C., McDade, J., Sai Pillutla, V., Zhou, X., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (in press). The nature and level of learner-learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3
   Google Scholar
• Tomkin, J. H., & Charlevoix, D. (2014). Do professors matter? Using an a/b test to evaluate the impact of instructor involvement on MOOC student outcomes. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning @ scale conference (pp. 71–78). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Policy questions on the Department of Education's 2007 guidance on collecting, maintaining and reporting data by race or ethnicity. Retrieved from https://ed.gov/policy/rschstat/guid/raceethnicity/questions.html
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570–587. doi:10.1111/bjet.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. L., Loizzo, J., Watson, W. R., Mueller, C., Lim, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Instructional design, facilitation, and perceived learning outcomes: An exploratory case study of a human trafficking MOOC for attitudinal change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1273–1300. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9457-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., & Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 119–129. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, F. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1(2), 217–235. doi:10.2307/2983604
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2012, January 8). ‘Badges’ earned online pose challenge to traditional college diplomas. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Badges-Earned-Online-Pose/130241
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. White Paper, Center for Educational Technology, Interoperability, and Standards. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1882–1895). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675217
   Google Scholar
• Zutshi, S., O'Hare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 218–227. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.838067
   Google Scholar