Bringing Disability Into the Discussion: Examining Technology Accessibility as An Equity Concern in the Field of Instructional Technology

References

• Asuncion, J. V., Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., & Wolforth, J. (2010). Multiple perspectives on the accessibility of e-learning in Canadian colleges and universities. Assistive Technology, 22(4), 187–199. doi: 10.1080/10400430903519944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, M., Pugalee, D., Flowers, C. P., & Algozzine, B. (2007). Accessibility of middle schools’ Web sites for students with disabilities. The Clearing House, 80(4), 169–178. doi: 10.3200/TCHS.80.4.169-178
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M., Flowers, C. P., & Gibson, P. (2003). Accessibility of school districts’ web sites: A descriptive study. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 209–221. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/ITCE/
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M., Flowers, C. P., Smith, S., & Algozzine, R. F. (2003). Accessibility of elementary schools’ web sites for students with disabilities. Education, 123(4), 815–830. Retrieved from https://www.projectinnovation.com/education.html
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2011). Identity first language. Retrieved from http://autisticadvocacy.org/about-asan/identity-first-language/
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, B. J. (2013). Disability studies/disability culture. In M. L. Wehmeyer (Ed.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 279–299). New York, NY: New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (Ed.). (2013). The disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264. doi: 10.1037/a0038636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichten, C., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M., … Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: an exploratory study. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 241–256. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/index.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 192–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2010). Women and gaming: the Sims and 21st century learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, D. C., & Buck, D. V. (2003). State IT accessibility policy: The landscape of today. Information Technology and Disabilities, 9(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://itd.athenpro.org
   Google Scholar
• Hashey, A. I., & Stahl, S. (2014). Making online learning accessible for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 70–78. doi: 10.1177/0040059914528329
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, P., Wahl, L., Stull, J., & Duffield, J. (2003). From policy to practice: Achieving equitable access to educational technology. Information Technology and Disabilities, 9(1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://itd.athenpro.org
   Google Scholar
• Kamei-Hannan, C. (2008). Examining the accessibility of a computerized adapted test using assistive technology. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(5), 261–271. Retrieved from http://www.afb.org/afbpress/jvib.aspx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Weiss, S., & Allen, M. (2006). Promising Practices of Accessible Information Technology in K-12 Educational Settings. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2006 (pp. 2284–2289). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Keierleber, M. (2018). A civil rights activist filed thousands of disability complaints. Now the education department is trying to shut her down. The 74. Retrieved from https://www.the74million.org/article/a-civil-rights-activist-filed-thousands-of-disability-complaints-now-the-education-department-is-trying-to-shut-her-down/
   Google Scholar
• Krach, S., & Jelenic, M. (2009). The other technological divide: K-12 web accessibility. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(2), 31–37. Retrieved from http://jst.sagepub.com/content/24/2/31.short doi: 10.1177/016264340902400203
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Goldstein, D. F., & Taylor, A. (2015). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, R. (1985). Universal design: Barrier-free environments for everyone. Designers West, 33(1), 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, S., Good, J., Sands, P., Yadav, A., Gretter, S., & Levenhagen-Seeley, J. (2018). Impact of after-school learning programs on high school girls’ confidence and interest in computing. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 372–378). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182551/
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of the Blind (NFB). (1993). Resolution 93–01. Retrieved from http://www.nfb.org/images/nfb/Publications/bm/bm09/bm0903/bm090308.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale v. Seattle School District, No. C14-1286 RAJ W.D. Wash. August 20, (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. (2005). The Kentucky accessible information technology in schools project. Information Technology and Disabilities, 11(1), 1. Retrieved from http://itd.athenpro.org
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, C., Savenye, W., & Rowland, C. (2003). Accessibility of state department of education home pages and special education pages. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(1), 17–28. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jst doi: 10.1177/016264340301800102
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. (2005). Systems change regarding accessible information technology in the K-12 educational environment. Information Technology and Disabilities, 11(1), 1. Retrieved from http://itd.athenpro.org/volume11/number1/peterson.html
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., Meyer, A. D., & Hitchcock, C. (Eds) (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, N. L., & Lazar, J. (2018). K-12 technology accessibility: The message from state governments. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 83–97. doi: 10.1177/0162643417734557
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Access Board. (2017). About the ICT refresh. Retrieved from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2011). Frequently asked questions about the June 29, 2010, Dear Colleague Letter. Retrieved from the Department of Education website http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-ebook-faq-201105.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division & U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2010). Joint Dear Colleague Letter: Electronic book readers by T. E. Perez and R. Ali. Retrieved from the Department of Education website http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-20100629.html
   Google Scholar
• VandenBos, G. R. (Ed). (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. (1988). Considerations in the design of computers to increase their accessibility by persons with disabilities. Retrieved from https://trace.umd.edu/publications/considerations-design-computers-increase-their-accessibility-persons-disabilities
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1990). Thirty-something million: Should they be exceptions? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 32(4), 383–396. doi: 10.1177/001872089003200402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7, 7. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/967/888/
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. A., & Barron, A. E. (2006). School web sites: Are they accessible to all? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(3), 23–30. doi: 10.1177/016264340602100303
   Google Scholar
• Wentz, B., Lazar, J., Stein, M., Gbenro, O., Holandez, E., & Ramsey, A. (2014). Danger, danger! Evaluating the accessibility of web-based emergency alert sign-ups in the Northeastern United States. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 488–497. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisdom, J. P., White, N., Goldsmith, K., Bielavitz, S., Rees, A., & Davis, C. (2007). Systems limitations hamper integration of accessible information technology in northwest U.S. K-12 schools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 222–232. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/index.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium. 2013. (\\chenas03.cadmus.com\SmartEdit\WatchFolder\XML_Signal_to_CCE_High_Speed_WF\ESA\IN\INPROCESS\40). Guidance on applying WCAG 2.0 to non-web information and communications technologies. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/
   Google Scholar