2,026
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting How and Why Educators Use Twitter: Tweet Types and Purposes in #Edchat

Pages 273-289 | Received 13 Dec 2018, Accepted 15 Apr 2019, Published online: 06 Jun 2019

References

  • boyd, d., dolder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43), IEEE, Kauai, HI. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
  • Britt, V. G., & Paulus, T. (2016). “Beyond the four walls of my building”: A case study of #Edchat as a community of practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 48–59. doi:10.1080/08923647.2016.1119609
  • Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
  • Carpenter, J. P., Tur, G., & Marín, V. I. (2016). What do U.S. and Spanish pre-service teachers think about educational and professional use of Twitter? A comparative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 131–143. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.011
  • Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
  • Davis, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(17), 1551–1558. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1052576
  • Forte, A., Humphreys, M., & Park, T. (2012). Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM12
  • Gao, F., & Li, L. (2017). Examining a one‐hour synchronous chat in a microblogging‐based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 332–347. doi:10.1111/bjet.12384
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Greenhow, C. M., Gleason, B., Marich, H., & Staudt Willet, K. B. (2017). Educating social scholars: Examining novice researchers’ practices with social media. Qwerty - Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture, and Education, 12(2), 30–45. Retrieved from http://www.ckbg.org/qwerty/index.php/qwerty/article/view/269
  • Hawksey, M. (2014). TAGS: Twitter Archiving Google Sheet (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://tags.hawksey.info
  • Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), 1–10. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.89
  • Humphreys, A. (2016). Social media: Enduring principles. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–303. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532
  • Kerr, S. L., & Schmeichel, M. J. (2018). Teacher Twitter chats: Gender differences in participants’ contributions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 241–252. doi:10.1080/15391523.2018.1458260
  • Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., & Woodward, S. (2017). Institutional uses of Twitter in U.S. higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97–111. doi:10.1007/s10755-016-9375-6
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C., & Millette, M. (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199–214). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2014). Twitter as a tool to promote community among language teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 187–212. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/49768
  • Luo, T., & Clifton, L. (2017). Examining collaborative knowledge construction in microblogging-based learning environments. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 365–390. doi:10.28945/3869
  • Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
  • Macià, M., & García, I. (2017). Properties of teacher networks in Twitter: Are they related to community-based peer production? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18, 110–140. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2644
  • Murthy, D. (2017). The ontology of tweets: Mixed-method approaches to the study of Twitter. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 559–572). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Noble, A., McQuillan, P., & Littenberg-Tobias, J. (2016). “A lifelong classroom”: Social studies educators’ engagement with professional learning networks on Twitter. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24, 187–213. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151754/
  • R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.0) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  • Rehm, M., & Notten, A. (2016). Twitter as an informal learning space for teachers!? The role of social capital in Twitter conversations among teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 215–223. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.015
  • Rosenberg, J. M., Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., Hamilton, E. R., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). An investigation of State Educational Twitter Hashtags (SETHs) as affinity spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2), 24–44. doi:10.1177/2042753016672351
  • Smith Risser, H. (2013). Virtual induction: A novice teacher’s use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.001
  • Twitter Developer (2018). API reference index [Web page]. Retrieved from https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/api-reference-index
  • Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). # TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925694
  • Vitak, J. (2017). Facebook as a research tool in the social and computer sciences. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 627–644). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Welser, H. T., Smith, M., Fisher, D., & Gleave, E. (2008). Distilling digital traces: Computational social science approaches to studying the Internet. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 116–141). London, UK: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9780857020055
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wesely, P. M. (2013). Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 305–318. doi:10.1177/0022487113489032
  • What is #Edchat? (n.d.). Retrieved February 25, 2019, from http://edchat.pbworks.com/w/page/219908/FrontPage
  • Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.010
  • Yang, S., Quan-Haase, A., Nevin, A. D., & Chen, Y. (2017). The role of online reputation management, trolling, and personality traits in the crafting of the virtual self on social media. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 74–89). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.