Validation of an Expressive and Receptive Tablet Assessment of Early Literacy

References

• Baker, E. (2017). Apps, iPads, and literacy: Examining the feasibility of speech recognition in a first-grade classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 291–310. doi:10.1002/rrq.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengfort, J. (2016). Cloud in the classroom is a secure, efficient solution. EdTech, Retrieved from: https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2016/09/cloud-classroom-secure-efficient-solution
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P., & Black, P. (2004). Redefining assessment? Then first ten years of Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 7–26. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208976
   Google Scholar
• Carson, K. L. (2017). Reliability and predictive validity of preschool web-based phonological awareness assessment for identifying school-aged reading difficulty. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 39(1), 259–269. doi:10.1177/1525740116686166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, K., Boustead, T., & Gillon, G. (2015). Content validity to support the use of a computer-based phonological awareness screening and monitoring assessment (Com PASMA) in the classroom. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(5), 500–510. doi:10.3109/17549507.2015.1016107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, K., Gillon, G., & Boustead, T. (2011). Computer-administrated versus paper-based assessment of school-entry phonological awareness ability. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 14(2), 85–101. doi:10.1179/136132811805334876
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511554377
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, L., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2014). The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37, 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., Horner, S. L., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2012). Alphabet knowledge in preschool: A Rasch model analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 543–554. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, B. (2013). Apps for babies: Implications for practice and policy. ESRC Research Capacity Building Clusters: National Summit Conference 201358–65). United Kingdom. Aston Business School, Aston University. ESRC Research Capacity Building Clusters; National Summit Conference 2013, 25–26 June.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310. doi:10.1177/1468798414533560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frary, R. B. (1988). Formula scoring of multiple-choice tests (correct for guessing). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(2), 33–38. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1988.tb00434.x
   Google Scholar
• Geist, E. (2014). Using tablet computers with toddlers and young pre-schoolers. Young Children, 69, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Girolametto, L., Wiigs, M., Smyth, R., Weitzman, E., & Pearce, P. S. (2001). Children with a history of expressive vocabulary delay: Outcomes at 5 years of age. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(4), 358–369. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/030)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K., & Highfield, K. (2012). iTouch and iLearn: An examination of ‘educational’ Apps. Early Education and Technology for Children conference. Salt Lake City, Utah. In: March 14–16, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2018). Assessment for learning as support for student self-regulation. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 51–63. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herodotou, C. (2018). Young children and tablets: A systematic review of effects on learning and development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 1–9. doi:10.1111/jcal.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, M., & Marshall, J. (2009). Evaluation of digital media for emergent literacy. Computers in the Schools, 26(4), 256–270. doi:10.1080/07380560903360186
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, D., Eames, C., & Coll, R. K. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on assessment in cooperative education placements. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15, 189–207.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). The four-factor index of social status. New Haven, CT. Unpublished manuscript. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Koomen, M., & Zoanetti, N. (2016). Strategic planning tools for large-scale technology-based assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25, 200–223. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1173013
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2015). Digital media and young children’s learning: A case study of using iPads in American preschools. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(12), 947–950. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.643
   Google Scholar
• Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Sabbe, E. (2013). Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education – Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 188–193. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. K., & Koo, M. Y. L. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, A., Cumming, J., van der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25, 442–467. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Ding, A.-C., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Experienced iPad-using early childhood teachers: Practices in the one-to-one iPad classroom. Computers in the Schools, 34(1–2), 9–15. doi:10.1080/07380569.2017.1287543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. (2016). The digital literacy skills and competencies of children of pre-school age. Media Education Studies and Social Research, 7, 197–214.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., Scott, F., Plowman, L., … Winter, P. (2015). Exploring Play and Creativity in Pre-Schoolers’ Use of Apps: Technology and Play. Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved from: http://www.techandplay.org/tap-media-pack.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., & Kocurek, C. A. (2017). Principles for educational game development for young children. Journal of Children and Media, 11(3), 314–329. doi:10.1080/17482798.2017.1308398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad, A.,J., Lakulu, M., & Samsudin, K. (2016). The needs of a framework of mobile application for kindergarten early reading: A review and analysis of the literature. International Journal of Academic Research and Social Science, 6, 225–230. doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2488
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. (2016). Emergent Literacy Assessment app. Retrieved from iTunes: https://goo.gl/m7lYg7
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014a). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 231–239. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0608-3
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M. & Neumann, D. L. (2014b). A measure of emerging print knowledge in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 184, 1142–1159. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.853054
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2018). Validation of a touch screen tablet assessment of literacy skills and a comparison with a traditional paper-based assessment. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1498078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, G., Wildy, H., & Berman, Y. (2018). Multimodal digital text creation using tablets and open-ended creative apps to improve the literacy learning of children in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 146879841877917. doi:10.1177/1468798418779171
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Petscher, Y., & Justice, L. M. (2012). How many letters should preschoolers in public programs know? The diagnostic efficiency of various preschool letter-naming benchmarks for predicting first-grade literacy achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 945–958. doi:10.1037/a0027757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, R., & Petrina, S. (2018). Social learning with mobile devices in preschool classrooms. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–15. doi:10.20897/ejsteme/3872
   Google Scholar
• Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1999). Speaking to read: The effects of speech recognition technology on the reading and spelling performance of children with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 49(1), 251–281. doi: doi:10.1007/s11881-999-0026-9
   Google Scholar
• Silseth, K., & Gilje, O. (2019). Multimodal composition and assessment: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, (1), 26–42. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., & Kottner, J., (2014). Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(9). 1970–1979. [Mismatch] doi:10.1111/jan.12402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatalaro, A., Culp, A. M., Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., & Barnes, A. C. (2018). A quasi-experiment examining expressive and receptive vocabulary knowledge of preschool Head Start children using mobile media apps. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 451–466. doi:10.1007/s10643-017-0877-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, P. F., & Petrie, A. (2010). Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology. Theriogenology, 73(9), 1167–1179. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., & Wolf, M. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1093–1109. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/076)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshyn, V. W., Bajovic, M., & Worden, M. M. (2017). Promoting student-centred learning using iPads in a grade 1 classroom: Using the digital didactic framework to deconstruct instruction. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 152–167. doi:10.1080/07380569.2017.1346456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Peng, J., Qin, M., Huang, X., Tian, F., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Can touchscreen devices be used to facilitate young children's learning? A meta-analysis of touchscreen learning effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar