What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology?

References

• *Allan, W. C., Erickson, J. L., Brookhouse, P., & Johnson, J. L. (2010). Teacher professional development through a collaborative curriculum project-An example of TPACK in Maine. Techtrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 54(6), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82. doi:10.1177/1052684619852114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Benade, L. (2017). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 796–807. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, F. A., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 207–225. doi:10.1177/1741143217745882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I.-H., Chin, J. M., & Hsu, C.-M. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of the dimensions and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology and Society, 11(4), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524–534. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Courduff, J., & Szapkiw, A. (2015). Technology integration in the resource specialist program environment: Research-based strategies for technology integration in complex learning environments. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 8(1), 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• *Courduff, J., Szapkiw, A., & Wendt, J. L. (2016). Grounded in what works: Exemplary practice in special education teachers' technology integration. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(1), 26–38. doi:10.1177/0162643416633333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devolder, A., Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Identifying multiple roles of ICT coordinators. Computers & Education, 55, 1651–1655. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W., & Nash, J. (2016). Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation: A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation. In M. D. Young & G. M. Crow (Eds), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 202–228), New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Dexter, S., Seashore Louis, K., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). The roles and practices of specialists in teamed instructional leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 19(4), 445–465. doi:10.1177/105268460901900403
   Google Scholar
• *Divaharan, S., & Ping, L. C. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741–763. doi:10.14742/ajet.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Franklin, C. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 267–293.
   Google Scholar
• *Gerard, L. F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Principal leadership for technology-Enhanced learning in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9070-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Glazer, E. M., Hannafin, M. J., Polly, D., & Rich, P. (2009). Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 21–39. doi:10.1080/07380560802688257
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Hammed, W. (2019). Knowledge production on educational leadership and management in Arab societies: A systematic review of the research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 20–36. doi:10.1177/1741143217717280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. doi:10.1080/0924345980090203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K–12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2017). “TPACK stories”: Schools and school districts repurposing a theoretical construct for technology-related professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(1–2), 1–15. doi:10.1080/15391523.2017.1295408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hartnell-Young, E. (2006). Teachers as designers in computer-supported communities of practice. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 10(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Haughey, M. (2006). The impact of computers on the work of the principal: Changing discourses on talk, leadership and professionalism. School Leadership & Management, 1, 23–36. doi:10.1080/13634230500492897
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. doi:10.3102/0034654315614911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jones, W. M., & Dexter, S. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 367–384. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9337-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012. Ontario: The Institute of Education Leadership. Retrieved from http://iel.immix.ca/storage/6/1360068388/Final_Research_Report_-_EN_REV_Feb_4_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Juang, Y., Liu, T., & Chan, T. (2008). Computer-supported teacher development of pedagogical content knowledge through developing school-based curriculum. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kafyaulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2015). Supporting teachers learning through the collaborative design of technology-enhanced science lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(8), 673–694. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9444-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kafyaulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535–1554. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/00131910120033628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• *McKenney, S., Boschman, F., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2016). Collaborative design of technology-enhanced learning: What can we learn from teacher talk? TechTrends, 60(4), 385–391. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• *Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 42(2), 111–131. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00067-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2006). Learner-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• New Schools. (2017). Investment area 2: Targeted technology investment. Retrieved from http://www.newschools.org/bigbet/
   Google Scholar
• *O’Neill, E. J. (2007). Implementing international virtual elementary classroom activities for public school students in the U.S. and Korea. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 5(3), 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• *Pan, S. C., & Franklin, T. (2011). In-service teachers’ self-efficacy, professional development, and Web 2.0 tools for integration. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. W., & Sterrett, W. L. (2018). District technology leadership then and now: A comparative study of district technology leadership from 2001 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 589–616. doi:10.1177/0013161X18769046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ritzhaupt, A. D., Hohlfeld, T. N., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Trends in technology planning and funding in Florida K-12 public schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(8), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• *Robertson, M., Grady, N., Fluck, A., & Webb, I. (2006). Conversations toward effective implementation of information communication technologies in Australian schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 71–85. doi:10.1108/09578230610642665
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Scribner, S. P., & Bradley-Levine, J. (2010). The meaning(s) of teacher leadership in an urban high school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 491–522. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2006). The essential supports for school improvement. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/EssentialSupports.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Staples, A., Pugach, M. C., & Himes, D. (2005). Rethinking the technology integration challenge: Cases from three urban elementary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 285–311. doi:10.1080/15391523.2005.10782438
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership context knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448. doi:10.3102/01623737025004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stevenson, M., Hedberg, J. G., O’Sullivan, K., & Howe, C. (2016). Leading learning: The role of school leaders in supporting continuous professional development. Professional Development in Education, 42(5), 818–835. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1114507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stroud, R., Drayton, B., Hobbs, K., & Falk, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard use in high-tech science classrooms: Patterns of integration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 9(9), 1041–1049. doi:10.391/ijet.v9i9.4141
   Google Scholar
• Sugar, W., & Holloman, H. (2009). Technology leaders wanted: Acknowledging the leadership role of a technology coordinator. TechTrends, 53, 66–75. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0346-y
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2009). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. doi:10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Svendsen, B. (2016). Teachers’ experience from a school-based collaborative teacher professional development programme: Reported impact on professional development. Teacher Development, 20(3), 313–328. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1149512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sweeney, T. (2010). Transforming pedagogy through interactive whiteboards: Using activity theory to understand tensions in practice. Australian Educational Computing, 24(2), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• *Tondeur, J., Krug, D., Bill, M., Smulders, M., & Zhu, C. (2015). Integrating ICT in Kenyan secondary schools: An exploratory case study of a professional development programme. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 24(5), 565–584. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1091786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Trust, T. (2016). New model of teacher learning in an online network. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(4), 290–305. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1215169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van Niekerk, M., & Blignaut, S. (2014). A framework for information and communication technology integration in schools through teacher professional development. Africa Education Review, 11(2), 236–253. doi:10.1080/18146627.2014.927159
   Google Scholar
• *Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 434–447. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Weal, B., & Coll, R. (2007). Exploring educational partnerships: A case study of client-provider technology education partnerships in New Zealand primary schools. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 3–36. doi:10.1080/02635140601053427
   Google Scholar
• *Wong, E. L., Li, S. C., Choi, T., & Lee, T. (2008). Insights into innovative classroom practices with ICT: Identifying the impetus for change. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 248–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Article included in the systematic review.
   Google Scholar