Distributed leadership for personalized learning

References

• Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. (2016). Using learning analytics in personalized learning. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools (pp. 165–174). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from www.centeril.org
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311. doi:10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernacki, M. L., & Walkington, C. (2018). The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 864–881. doi:10.1037/edu0000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (4th Edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boninger, F., Molnar, A., & Saldaña, C. M. (2019). Personalized learning and the digital privatization of curriculum and teaching. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/personalized-learning
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, S., & Benson, S. (2014). Personalized learning for every student every day. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(8), 33–38. doi:10.1177/003172171409500808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2018). The flight of a butterfly or the path of a bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. M. (2010). On school educational technology leadership. Management in education, 24(2), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Demski, J. (2012). This time it’s personal. T|H|E Journal. Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/articles/2012/01/04/personalized-learning.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, B., & Hartnett, M. (2014). Using a learning management system to personalise learning for primary school students. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., & Cummins, M. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182003/
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48–70. doi:10.1111/curi.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. R. (2003). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(37), 37–34. doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n37.2003
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. R. (2004). Accessing, documenting, and communicating practical wisdom: The phronesis of school leadership practice. American Journal of Education, 111(1), 90–121. doi:10.1086/424721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. R., Barnicle, A., Hackett, S., Rawat, T., Rutledge, J., Kallio, J., & Mertes, J. (2015). Personalization in Practice: Observations from the Field. WCER Working Paper No. 2015-8. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. R., & Kelley, C. (2017). Leadership for learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. R., & Shapiro, B. (2013). Technologies for education and technologies for learning. In D. Anagnostopolous, S. Rutledge, & R. Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability (pp. 163–180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21 century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–78). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–227. doi:10.1177/1365480216659733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufman-Frederick, A., Klau, K., O’Connor, D., & Niegelsky, E. (2017). Landscape analysis of personalized learning in massachusetts. Boston, MA: MAPLE Consortium at LearnLaunch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, S., & Louis, K. S. (2008). Strong cultures: A principal's guide to change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. doi:10.1080/00405849509543675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What do we already know about educational leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 12–27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, N., Patrick, S., & Sturgis, C. (2017). Quality and equity by design: Charting the course for the next phase of competency-based education. Vienna, VA: CompetencyWorks and iNACOL.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurrer, J. (2007, December). NCLB Year 5: Choices, changes and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Revised. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149. doi:10.1177/104973239500500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961–972. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natriello, G. (Ed.). (2013). Adaptive educational technologies: Tools for learning, and for learning about learning. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://www.naeducation.org/cs/groups/naedsite/documents/webpage/naed_085633.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rickabaugh, J. (2016). Tapping the power of personalized learning: A roadmap for school leaders. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/jcal.12172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg, V. S., Wills, J., Redmond, K., & Skaff, L. (2014). Use of individualized learning plans as a promising practice for driving college and career readiness efforts: Findings and recommendations from a multi-method, multi-study effort. Washington, DC: National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth, Institute for Educational Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• SRI International. (2018). Using Technology to Personalize Learning in K–12 Schools. SRI International: Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/work/publications/using-technology-personalize-learning-k-12-schools
   Google Scholar
• Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535180.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Issue brief: Personalized learning plans. U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/high-school/personalized-learning-plans.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1996). Building innovative capacity and leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–696). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar