Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs

References

• Al-Bataineh, A., Anderson, S., Toledo, C., & Wellinski, S. (2008). A study of technology integration in the classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(4), 381–387. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A273359028/AONE?u=colu44332&sid=AONE&xid=511249df
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, N., Butler, J. S., & Toma, E. F. (2012). Do less effective teachers choose professional development does it matter? Evaluation Review, 36(5), 346–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X12473304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, A., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K–12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782398
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), 5–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ873675.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (1st ed.). Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S.-L., Lu, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020). Understanding teacher technology integration from expectancy-value perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103062. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. L., & Xie, K. (2018). The relations among teacher value beliefs, personal characteristics, and TPACK in intervention and non-intervention settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 98–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churches, A. (2010). Bloom's digital taxonomy. Australian School Library Association NSW Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0527-3
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, T., & Balli, S. J. (2014). Digital natives: Fifth-grade students’ authentic and ritualistic engagement with technology. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 21–34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289951640_Digital_Natives_Fifth-Grade_Students'_Authentic_and_Ritualistic_Engagement_with_Technology
   Google Scholar
• Dugdale, S., Legare, O., Matthews, J. I., & Ju, M. K. (1998). Mathematical problem solving and computers: A study of learner-initiated application of technology in a general problem-solving context. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1998.10782225
   Google Scholar
• Er, E., & Kim, C. (2017). Episode-centered guidelines for teacher belief change toward technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 1041–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9518-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1999.10782269
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). (n.d.). A comprehensive guide. www.everystudentsucceedsact.org
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in education: A critical literature review and its implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112–125.
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A., & Dawson, S. (2017). Detecting learning strategies with analytics: Links with self-reported measures and academic performance. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.10
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.989230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2005). Our agenda for technology integration: It’s time to choose. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 116–122. https://citejournal.org/volume-5/issue-2-05/editorial/our-agenda-for-technology-integration-its-time-to-choose
   Google Scholar
• Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixon, E., & Buckenmeyer, J. (2009). Revisiting technology integration in schools: Implications for professional development. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560902906070
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Chang, Y.-H., & Liang, J.-C. (2017). Surveying in-service teachers’ beliefs about game-based learning and perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge of games. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in k-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). (2020). ISTE standards for educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J., & Rose, C. B. (2006). Finding space for technology: Pedagogical observations on the organization of computers in school environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21432/T2NS3Z
   Google Scholar
• Kale, U., & Akcaoglu, M. (2018). The role of relevance in future teachers’ utility value and interest toward technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(2), 283e311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9547-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Culp, K. M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782439
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Xie, K., & Cheng, S. L. (2017). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 309–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H., Tsai, H. C., & Huang, Y. T. (2015). Collaborative professional development of mentor teachers and pre-service teachers in relation to technology integration. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, M. (2003). The role of information and communications technology inputs. National Institute Economic Review, 184(1), 58–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950103184001005
   Google Scholar
• Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., Wellington, D., Zhao, A. (2016). Education technology in the every student succeeds act. The Center on Technology and Disability. http://www.ctdinstitute.org/sites/default/files/file_attachments/ESSAEdtechSum-120116-508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., & Bagley, G. (2015). Nurturing the integration of technology in education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(1), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, P. G., & Lawless, K. A. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviours approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement, 43(9), 8–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430905
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., & Mouza, C. (2007). The impact of professional development on teacher learning, practice and leadership skills: A study on the integration of technology in the teaching of writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(3), 229–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.b
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teitel, L. (2000). Assessment: Assessing the impacts of professional development schools. AACTE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., De Bruyne, E., Van Den Driessche, M., McKenney, S., & Zandvliet, D. (2015). The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.998624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallett, D. B., Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2018). After-school and informal STEM projects: The effect of participant self-selection. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(3), 248–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9721-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers' internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., Lu, L., & Xie, K. (2019, April). Bloom’s digital taxonomy scale: A validation study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
   Google Scholar
• Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Kim, M. K., Cheng, S.-L., & Luthy, N. C. (2017). Teacher professional development through digital content evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 1067–1103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9519-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Vongkulluksn, V., Justice, L. M., & Logan, J. (2019). Technology acceptance in context: Preschool teachers’ integration of a technology-based early language and literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2019.1572678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of teachers’ ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34, 171–186. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284793197_Current_utilization_of_ICT_in_Turkish_basic_education_schools_A_review_of_teacher's_ICT_use_and_barriers_to_integration
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar