References
- Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
- Barth-Cohen, L. A., Jiang, S., Shen, J., Chen, G., & Eltoukhy, M. (2018). Interpreting and Navigating Multiple Representations for Computational Thinking in a Robotics Programming Environment. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1-2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0006-2
- Basawapatna, A., Koh, K. H., Repenning, A., Webb, D. C., & Marshall, K. S. (2011, March). Recognizing computational thinking patterns [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer science education (pp. 245–250). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953241
- Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x
- Brennan, K., Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–25).
- Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001
- Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2019). Statistical analysis of complex problem-solving process data: An event history analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00486
- CSTA. (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K–12 Education, 2011. https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/CompThinkingFlyer.pdf
- Dagiene, V., & Stupuriene, G. (2016). Bebras-a sustainable community building model for the concept based learning of informatics and computational thinking. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 25.
- Grover, S., Bienkowski, M., Basu, S., Eagle, M., Diana, N., & Stamper, J. (2017, March). A framework for hypothesis-driven approaches to support data-driven learning analytics in measuring computational thinking in block-based programming [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 530–531). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029440
- Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
- Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100–108.
- Hubwieser, P., Mühling, A. (2015, April). Investigating the psychometric structure of Bebras contest: towards mesuring computational thinking skills. In 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) (pp. 62–69). IEEE.
- Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., Basu, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: a system for synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7/s10956-019-09804-9
- Klahr, D., & Carver, S. M. (1988). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 362–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90004-7
- Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective: Integrating computational thinking in K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w
- Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). On computational thinking and STEM education. Journal for STEM Educational Research, 3, 147–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w
- Liu, Z., Zhi, R., Hicks, A., & Barnes, T. (2017). Understanding problem solving behavior of 6–8 graders in a debugging game. Computer Science Education, 27(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1308651
- Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
- Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2005). Clustering students to help evaluate learning. In Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 31–42). Springer.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
- Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaïane, O. R. (2009). Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 759–772. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.138
- Perković, L., Settle, A., Hwang, S., & Jones, J. (2010, June). A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 123–127). ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822126
- Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
- Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
- Seehorn, D., Carey, S., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., Moix, D., O'Grady-Cunniff, D., Owens, B. B., Stephenson, C., & Verno, A. (2011). CSTA K–12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2011.
- Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
- Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
- Snow, J., & Mann, M. (2013). Qualtrics survey software: handbook for research professionals. Qualtrics Labs, Inc.
- Tang, T. Y., & McCalla, G. (2005). Smart recommendation for an evolving e-learning system: Architecture and experiment. International Journal on Elearning, 4(1), 105.
- Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
- Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., Kawamoto, D. C. (2012, February). The fairy performance assessment: measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 215–220). ACM.
- Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
- Xu, H., Fang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2018). Latent class analysis of recurrent events in problem-solving items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(6), 478–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617748325
- Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2020). Improving and assessing computational thinking in maker activities: The integration with physics and engineering learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8