References
- Akçayır, M., Dündar, H., & Akçayır, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435–440.
- Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116.
- Bang, E., & Luft, J. A. (2013). Secondary science teachers’ use of technology in the classroom during their first 5 years. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 118–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784715
- Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
- Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
- Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77–87). Springer.
- Chen, S. Y., Kuo, H. Y., & Hsieh, T. C. (2019). New literacy practice in a facebook group: The case of a residential learning community. Computers & Education, 134, 119–131.
- Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
- Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
- Encheva, M., Tammaro, A. M., & Kumanova, A. (2020). Games to improve students information literacy skills. International Information & Library Review, 52(2), 130–138.
- Expósito, A., Sánchez-Rivas, J., Gómez-Calero, M. P., & Pablo-Romero, M. P. (2020). Examining the use of instructional video clips for teaching macroeconomics. Computers & Education, 144, 103709.
- Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. (2000). Social‐desirability bias and the validity of self‐reported values. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 105–120.
- Fluck, A., & Dowden, T. (2013). On the cusp of change: examining pre‐service teachers' beliefs about ICT and envisioning the digital classroom of the future. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00464.x
- Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 625–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203573
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
- Hall, J. A. (2018). A Mixed Methods Comparison Of The First Principles Of Instruction In Flipped And Face-To-Face Technology Integration Courses. [Doctoral dissertation Syracuse University]. Syracuse University.
- Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3833–-3840). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Harrison, J., Chapleau, A., Schell, M., Vaughan, V., & Colzin, C. (2020). Leveraging technology in field education for digital natives: Using goal attainment scaling. Social Work Education, 39(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1642318
- Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
- Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. [Database] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Huang, F., Teo, T., & He, J. (2019). Digital nativity of university teachers in China: Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Digital Native Assessment Scale (DNAS). Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570278
- Hurwitz, L. B., & Schmitt, K. L. (2020). Can children benefit from early internet exposure? Short-and long-term links between internet use, digital skill, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 146, 103750.
- Imran, H. (2019). Evaluation of awarding badges on Student’s engagement in Gamified e-learning systems. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1–12.
- Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr,., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
- JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.10.0). In
- Johnson, L. (2012). The effect of design teams on preservice teachers' technology integration.
- Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 99–119.
- Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., Bishop, A., Maton, K., Krause, K.-L., & Chang, R. (2009). Educating the net generation: A handbook of findings for practice and policy. University of Melbourne Press.
- Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
- Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (Vol. 30). Peter Lang.
- Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.
- Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
- Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 22 140, 55.
- Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x
- MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
- Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.
- Marksbury, N., & Bryant, E. A. (2019). Enter the twilight zone: The paradox of the digital native. Issues in Information Systems, 20(2), 206–215.
- Martin, E. M. P. (2011). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Teaching with technology. Northeastern University. http://search.proquest.com/docview/921887406
- Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35(11), 1012–1027.
- Messick, S. (1987). Validity. ETS Research Report Series, 1987(2), i-208.
- Messick, S. (1998). Consequences of test interpretation and use: The fusion of validity and values in psychological assessment. ETS Research Report Series. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1998.tb01797.x
- Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., & Leisch, F. (2019). e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics. In Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071).
- Miller, C., & Bartlett, J. (2012). Digital fluency': towards young people's critical use of the internet. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11645/6.2.1714
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Mulder, D. J. (2016). Pre-service teachers and technology integration: International cases and generational attitudes toward technology in education. In Teacher Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 730-752). IGI Global.
- National Assessment Governing Board. (2014). Technology and engineering literacy framework for the 2014 national assessment of educational progress. https://www.nagb.org/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/technology/2014-technology-framework.pdf
- Nickerson, J. P. (2019). Social media and radiology education: are we #ready? Academic Radiology, 26(7), 986–988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.015
- Oh, E., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Generational differences and the integration of technology in learning, instruction, and performance. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. (pp. 819–828). Springer.
- Oriji, A., & Torunarigha, Y. D. (2020). Digitized education: Examining the challenges of digital immigrant educators in the face of net generation learners. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 337–347.
- Pegg, J., Reading, C., & Williams, M. (2007). Partnerships in ICT learning study. Department.
- Pew Research Center. (2019). Mobile fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
- Pierson, M., & Cozart, A. (2005). Novice teacher case studies: A changing perspective on technology during induction years. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
- Prensky, M. (2006). Don't bother me, mom, I'm learning!: How computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help!. Paragon House New York.
- Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (1st ed., pp. 15–29). Routledge.
- Ribble, M. (2011). The nine elements of digital citizenship. In Digital citizenship in schools (pp. 16-44). International Society for Technology in Education.
- Savazzi, F., Isernia, S., Jonsdottir, J., Di Tella, S., Pazzi, S., & Baglio, F. (2018). Engaged in learning neurorehabilitation: Development and validation of a serious game with user-centered design. Computers & Education, 125, 53–61.
- Southall, S. P. (2012). Digital native preservice teachers: An examination of their self-efficacy beliefs regarding technology integration in classroom settings. Virginia Commonwealth University.
- Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). Computers & Education, 67, 51–57.
- Teo, T. (2016). Do digital natives differ by computer self-efficacy and experience? An empirical study. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1725–1739.
- Teo, T., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2016). Exploring the digital natives among pre-service teachers in Turkey: a cross-cultural validation of the Digital Native Assessment Scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1231–1244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.980275
- Thomas, K., & O'Bannon, B. (2015). Looking across the new digital divide: A comparison of inservice and preservice teacher perceptions of mobile phone integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(4), 561–581.
- Thompson, P. (2015). How digital native learners describe themselves. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 467–484.
- Tournaki, N., & Lyublinskaya, I. (2014). Preparing special education teachers for teaching mathematics and science with technology by integrating TPACK framework into the curriculum: A study of teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 243–259.
- U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology (USDOE-OET). (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. http://tech.ed.gov/netp/
- Wagner, V., & Acier, D. (2017). Factor structure evaluation of the French version of the Digital natives assessment scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0438
- Wang, H. Y., Sigerson, L., & Cheng, C. (2019). Digital nativity and information technology addiction: Age cohort versus individual difference approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.031
- Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637–662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4
- Warf, B. (2019). Teaching digital divides. Journal of Geography, 118(2), 77–87.
- Yong, S. T., Gates, P., & Harrison, I. (2016). Digital native students – Where is the evidence? The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6(1), 46–58.
- Yurdakul, I. K. (2018). Modeling the relationship between pre-service teachers’ TPACK and digital nativity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 267–281.