642
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Comparing the relationship between using educational technology in mathematics and student achievement in South Africa and Germany

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 581-598 | Received 20 Aug 2020, Accepted 11 Mar 2021, Published online: 06 Apr 2021

References

  • Abdelfattah, F., & Lam, J. (2018). Linking homework to achievement in mathematics: An examination of 8th Grade Arab participation in TIMSS 2015. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11438a
  • Ariyanto, L., Kusumaningsih, W., Aini, A. (2018). Mobile phone application for mathematics learning. In N. Hidayat, M. Rasiman, S. Novita, A. Handayani, & A. Buchori (Eds.). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE 2018). Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 983, No. 1, p. 012106). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012106
  • Armstrong, P. (2015). Teacher characteristics and student performance: An analysis using hierarchical linear modelling. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i2.385
  • Ayieko, R. A., Gokbel, E. N., & Nelson, B. (2017). Does computer use matter? The influence of computers on students’ mathematics reasoning. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 4(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.18275/fire201704011120
  • Bulut, O., & Cutumisu, M. (2017). When technology does not add up: ICT use negatively predicts mathematics and science achievement for Finnish and Turkish students in PISA 2012. Paper presented at EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 935–945). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://sites.ualberta.ca/∼cutumisu/publications/2017/2017EdMedia_BulutCutumisu.pdf
  • Caponera, E., & Losito, B. (2016). Context factors and student achievement in the IEA studies: Evidence from TIMSS. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0030-6
  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teacher College Record, 64(8), 723–733.
  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). Effective instruction: An empirical basis for a theory of educational effectiveness. In D. Reynolds, B.P.M. Creemers, P.S. Nesselrodt, E.C. Schaffer, S. Stringfield & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research and practice (pp. 189–205). Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-042392-0.50014-0
  • Daoud, R., Starkey, L., Eppel, E., Vo, T. D., & Sylvester, A. (2020). The educational value of internet use in the home for school children: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1783402
  • Eickelmann, B., Gerick, J., & Koop, C. (2017). ICT use in mathematics lessons and the mathematics achievement of secondary school students by international comparison: Which role do school level factors play? Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1527–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9498-5
  • Erdogdu, F., & Erdogdu, E. (2015). The impact of access to ICT, student background and school/home environment on academic success of students in Turkey: An international comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.1010.1023
  • Falck, O., Mang, C., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12192
  • Garson, G. D. (2013). Fundamentals of hierarchical linear and multilevel modeling. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications (pp. 3–26). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450.n3
  • Geesa, R. L., Izci, B., Song, H., & Chen, S. (2019). Exploring factors of home resources and attitudes towards mathematics in mathematics achievement in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108487
  • Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2019). TIMSS 2015: Grade 4 SPSS data and documentation. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://www.iea.nl/repository/studies/timss-2015l.
  • Johansone, I. (2016). Survey operations procedures in TIMSS. 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 6.1–6.22). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-6.html
  • Koğar, E. Y. (2019). The investigation of the relationship between mathematics and science literacy and information and communication technology variables. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019349250
  • Kruger, G. M. (2018). The relationship between investment in ICT and mathematics achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pretoria. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/67752/Kruger_Relationship_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Kyriakides, L. C. R. J., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.11.4.501.3560
  • LaRoche, S., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample implementation in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 5.1–5.175). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-5.html
  • LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 3.1–3.37). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-3.html
  • Meggiolaro, S. (2018). Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: evidence from Italy. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9425-7
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Hooper, M. (2016a). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Loveless, T. (2016b). 20 years of TIMSS international trends in mathematics and science achievement, curriculum and instruction. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/timss2015/wp-content/uploads/2016/T15-20-years-of-TIMSS.pdf.
  • Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived quality of educational technology matters: A secondary analysis of students' ICT use, ICT-related attitudes, and PISA 2012 test scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649373
  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2013). HLM 7.01 for Windows [Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling software]. Multivariate Software.
  • Reddy, V., Isdale, K., Juan, A., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Arends, F. (2016). Highlights of mathematics achievement amongst Grade 5 South African learners. Human Sciences Research Council. https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/TIMSS%202015%20Grade%205%20Highlights%20document.pdf
  • Rodrigues, M., & Biagi, F. (2017). Digital technologies and learning outcomes of students from low socio-economic background: An analysis of PISA 2015. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Science for Policy Report. http://doi.org/10.2760/415251
  • Saal, P. E., Graham, M. A., & Van Ryneveld, L. (2020). The relationship between integrating educational technology in mathematics education and the mathematics achievement of German students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939
  • Saal, P. E., van Ryneveld, L., & Graham, M. A. (2019). The relationship between using information and communication technology in education and the mathematics achievement of students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12325a
  • Şahin, M. G., & Öztürk, N. B. (2018). How classroom assessment affects science and mathematics achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2015. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10, 559–569. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018541305
  • Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
  • Tan, C. Y., & Hew, K. F. (2019). The impact of digital divides on student mathematics achievement in Confucian heritage cultures: A critical examination using PISA 2012 data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(6), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9917-8
  • Visser, M., Juan, A., & Feza, N. (2015). Home and school resources as predictors of mathematics performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062354
  • Wendt, H., Bos, W., Selter, C., Köller, O., Schwippert, K., & Kasper, D. (2016). Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Münster. Waxmann. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2017/14022/pdf/Wendt_et_al_2016_TIMSS_2015.pdf
  • Western Cape Education Department (WCED). (2019). Technology in classrooms: What are smart classrooms? https://www.westerncape.gov.za/general-publication/technology-classrooms-what-are-smart-classrooms
  • Wiberg, M. (2019). The relationship between TIMSS mathematics achievements, grades, and national test scores. Education Inquiry, 10(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.20002019.21579626.
  • Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 50(4), 1558–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.03.001
  • Yavuz, E., Tan, Ş., & Atar, H. Y. (2019). Effects of students and school variables on SBS achievements and growth in mathematics. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 10, 96–116. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.493297.
  • Yoo, J. E. (2018). TIMSS 2011 Student and teacher predictors for mathematics achievement explored and identified via elastic net. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 317–310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00317
  • Zech, T. (2018). Digitally educated. https://wwwdeutschland.de/en/topic/knowledge/digital-literacy-for-school-pupils-three-good-examples
  • Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a
  • Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2020). Content learning opportunities, computer based instruction, and students’ mathematics and science achievement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8),1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1717659
  • Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-40016-40026-40562

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.