Synchronous CMC text chat versus synchronous CMC voice chat: impacts on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and anxiety

References

• Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners’ discourse functions. Computers & Education, 62, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guide-lines—Speaking (3rd ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Alahmadi, B. H. (2009). How can synchronous computer-mediated communication SCMC be exploited to help develop the speaking skills of the Saudi English language learner? [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology (Vol. 4, pp. 279–283). Jeju, South Korea: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMT.2009.90
   Google Scholar
• Alastuey, M. C. B. (2010). Synchronous-voice computer-mediated communication: Effects on pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 1–20. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7bef/2dfe69e6c4e5bad5fc5d999be95ac8581115.pdf https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.1-20
   Google Scholar
• Alastuey, M. C. B. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.574639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, N. (2007). Reducing foreign language apprehension with computer-mediated communication: a preliminary study. System, 35(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Bataineh, A. (2014). The effect of using audiovisual chat on developing English as a foreign language learners’ fluency and productivity of authentic oral texts. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i3.5563
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.2.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00858.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. (2008). Survey on technology use for language learning (Survey). Unpublished instrument. Department of English, Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chérrez, N. V. J. (2007). A case study of the impact and usefulness of synchronous voice chat to improve EFL learners’ spoken production [Retrospective Theses and Dissertations]. Iowa State University Digital Repository. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=16033&context=rtd
   Google Scholar
• Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X
   Google Scholar
• Compton, L. (2002). From chatting to confidence: A case study of the impact of online chatting on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate, confidence level and fluency in oral communication [Unpublished MA thesis]. Department of English, Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=15444&context=rtd
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, M. C. (2004). Because we are shy and fear mistaking: CMC with EFL writers. Journal of Basic Writing, 23(2), 23–48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ684124.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C. H., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugartsyrenova, V. A., & Sardegna, V. G. (2017). Developing oral proficiency with VoiceThread: Learners’ strategic uses and views. ReCALL, 29(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 67–86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45647492_Discourse_and_Participation_in_ESL_Face-to-Face_and_Written_Electronic_Conferences
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, C. (2015). The influence of group formation on learner participation, language complexity, and corrective behaviour in synchronous written chat as part of academic German studies. ReCALL, 27(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiermuth, M. R. (2011). Debating in an online world: a comparative analysis of speaking, writing and online chat. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 31(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.006
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoneim, N. M. M., & Elghotmy, H. E. A. (2016). Using voice thread to develop pre-service teachers' speaking skills. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(6), 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, J., & Suvorov, R. (2003). Learner perceptions of asynchronous oral computer-mediated communication tasks using Wimba Voice for developing their L2 oral proficiency. In S. Huffman & V. Hegelheimer (Eds.), The role of CALL in hybrid and online language courses. Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, D. (2005). Developing oral skills through communicative and interactive tasks. Profile, 6, 83–96. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902005000100008
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 66–82. http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/hampel/default.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal inter- action in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirotani, M. (2013). Synchronous versus asynchronous CMC and transfer to Japanese oral performance. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/calicojournal.26.2.413
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70 (2), 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1991). Foreign language classroom anxiety. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications (pp. 27–36). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2002). IRC Français: The creation of an Internet-based SLA community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.2.109.8197
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. W., & Higgins, S. (2016). Learners’ use of communication strategies in text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication environments: Opportunities for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 901–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1074589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, J. (2005). Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98. https://fliphtml5.com/lecs/xgtr/basic
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenning, M. M. (2010). Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009990164
   Google Scholar
• Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143
   Google Scholar
• Ko, C. (2012). Can synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) help beginning-level foreign language learners speak? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.649483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köroğlu, Z. Ç., & Çakır, A. (2017). Implementation of flipped instruction in language classrooms: An alternative way to develop speaking skills of pre-service English language teachers. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 13(2), 42–55. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153321.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kost, C. R. (2004). An investigation of the effects of synchronous computer mediated communication (CMC) on interlanguage development in beginning learners of German: Accuracy, proficiency and communication strategies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona. https://search.proquest.com/openview/5ec5d731de0e21fa3f96871c779e1024/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, M. (2001). Developing distance language learners’ interactive competence: Can synchronous audio do the trick? International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(4), 327–353. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8412/
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London House.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 102–120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45647767_Noticing_and_Text-Based_Chat
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00015-5
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237710614_CALL_dimensions_options_and_issues_in_computer_assisted_language_learning
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017
   Google Scholar
• Mahfouz, S. M., & Ihmeideh, F. M. (2009). Attitudes of Jordanian university students towards using online chat discourse with native speakers of English for improving their language proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902920151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, M., & Cappellini, M. (2019). Alignment during synchronous video versus written chat L2 interactions: A methodological exploration. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 29–45. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84321002.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Tilwani, S. A., Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2021). The impact of authentic materials on reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety among Iranian male EFL learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1892001.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. (2005). The paired format in the Cambridge speaking tests. ELT Journal, 59(4), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci057
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, Y., Onishi, A., Ishihara, M., & Yamashiro, M. (2015). Voice-based computer mediated communication for individual practice to increase speaking proficiency: Construction and pilot study. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. LCT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9192). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-20609-7_12
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35–54. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74479/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2013). Developing L2oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95531/.
   Google Scholar
• Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2009). Learner interaction in synchronous CMC: A sociocultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903184690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Poza, M. I. C. (2005). The effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on learners’ anxiety when speaking a foreign language [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Razagifard, P. (2013). The impact of text-based CMC on improving L2 oral fluency. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razmi, M. H., Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2020). Perfectionism, self-efficacy components, and metacognitive listening strategy use: A multicategorical multiple mediation analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(6), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09733-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. M. (2007). Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 10(3), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rezai, A. A., & Zafari, N. (2010). The impact of synchronous computer-mediated communication (S-CMC) on the oral proficiency of Iranian EFL Learners. IJAL, 13(2), 102–119. https://file:///C:/Users/ASUS/AppData/Local/Temp/ijla-v13n2p101-fa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Romoszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782.
   Google Scholar
• Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2005). Task design for audiographic conferencing: Promoting beginner oral interaction in distance language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500442772
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. (2009). Reaching students: A hybrid approach to language learning. In R. Oxford & J. Oxford (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning in the net generation (pp. 64–84). University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language Learning, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
   Google Scholar
• Saha, M. (2014). EFL test anxiety: Sources and supervisions. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/020208
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2003a). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2003b). The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00072-6
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, J. M. (2013). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399–431. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74220/.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei, O., & Sharifi, R. (2011). Online discussion: self-repair enhancement of EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.7.837-846
   Google Scholar
• Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82–99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280836529_Categorization_of_text_chat_communication_between_learners_and_native_speakers_of_Japanese_Electronic_version
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language: A handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern language testing (2nd ed.). Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(01), 122–146. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9e2b/672f987f0724a83bbd17e8c774f79fdfd69d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2007). Online synchronous language learning: SLMS over the Internet. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(3), 1–7. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol3/iss3/5/
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2 & 3), 7–26. http://education.uci.edu/uploads/7/2/7/6/72769947/comparing_face-to-face_and_electronic_discussion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Lepeintre, S. (1997). Freire’s dream or Foucault’s nightmare? Teacher–student relations on an international computer network. In R. Debski, J. Gassin, & M. Smith (Eds.), Language learning through social computing (pp. 67–89). Applied Linguistics Association of Australia and Horwood Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, O., & Yang, S. (2005). Computer-mediated communication discourse in students' classroom writing. Ohio Communication Journal, 44, 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52(4), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220601118503
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. C., & Chang, L. (2008). Improvement—Reflections and suggestions on the use of Skype to enhance college student’s oral English proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 721–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong Kim, H. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z. (2020). Extending the learning technology acceptance model of WeChat by adding new psychological constructs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1121–1143. 0735633120923772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120923772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Gao, M., & Wang, L. (2020). The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(2), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2013). Recent developments in technology and language learning: a literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24149478
   Google Scholar