What is the degree of teacher centrality in optimal teaching of digital literacy in a technology-enhanced environment? Typology of teacher prototypes

References

• Atmaca, C. (2018). Contrasting perspectives of pre-service and in-service English teachers: What should be an English teacher’s role? International Journal of Languages’ Education, 6(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2567
   Google Scholar
• Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidov-Ungar, O., Shamir-Inbal, T. & Blau, I. (2020). Typology of digital leadership roles tasked with integrating new technologies into teaching: Insights from metaphor analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1809035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2006). How does information technology shape thinking? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium, pp. 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M. (2014). Conceptualizing assessment culture in school. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning. The enabling power of assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 285–302). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I. (2011). E-collaboration within, between, and without institutions: Towards better functioning of online groups through networks. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7, 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Mor, N., & Neuthal, T. (2013). Interacting for learning: Digital portfolios for a learning community in a university course. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Grinberg, R., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Pedagogical perspectives and practices reflected in metaphors of learning and digital learning of ICT leaders. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017a). Digital competences and long-term ICT integration in school culture: The perspective of elementary school leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769–787.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017b). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T. & Hadad, S. (2020). Digital collaborative learning in elementary and middle schools as a function of individualistic and collectivistic culture: The role of ICT coordinators’ leadership experience, students’ collaboration skills, and sustainability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36(5), 672–687.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I. & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2021). Writing private and shared annotations and lurking in Annoto hyper-video in academia: Insights from learning analytics, content analysis, and interviews with lecturers and students. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09984-5.
   Google Scholar
• Borthwick, A. C., & Hansen, R. (2017). Digital literacy in teacher education: Are teacher educators competent? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1291249
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Casey, L., & Hallissy, M. (2016). Live learning: Online teaching, digital literacy and the practice of inquiry. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v1i1.4
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2011). Collaboration and psychological ownership: How does the tension between the two influence perceived learning? Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 283–298.
   Google Scholar
• Castek, J., & Bernadette, D. (2018). Think globally, act locally: Teaching climate change through digital inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 755–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L. C., & Lee, G. C. (2010). A team-teaching model for practicing project-based learning in high school: Collaboration between computer and subject teachers. Computers & Education, 55(3), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2019). Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2009). Promising practices for supporting adolescents’ online literacy development. In K. D. Wood & W. E. Blanton (Eds.), Literacy instruction for adolescents: Research-based practice (pp. 442–471). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Castek, J. (2010). Assessment frameworks for teaching and learning English language arts in a digital age. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 314–321). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In J. Green, G. Camilli, and P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 375–385). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID … and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute. http://www.iftf.org/futureworkskills/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2004). Wiki brainstorming and problems with wiki-based collaboration. Report on a project submitted for the degree of Information Processing in the Department of Computer Science at the University of York. Retrieved April 20, 2020, from http://jonathan-davies.co.uk/portfolio/wiki/wiki_collaboration_and_brainstorming.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donelan, H., & Kear, K. (2018). Creating and collaborating students’ and tutors’ perceptions of an online group project. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, B. (2016). Engaging all students in internet research and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECDL Foundation. (2016). Perception and reality. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from http://ecdl.org/media/perceptionandrealitymeasuringdigitalskillsineuropeecdlfoundationpositionpaper1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9094-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
   Google Scholar
• Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 7(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fives, H. & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J., & Hayes, E. (2013). Nurturing affinity spaces and game-based learning. In J. Gee (Ed.), Good video games + good learning (2nd ed., pp. 103–124). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hadad, S., Shamir-Inbal, T., Blau, I., Leykin, E. (2020). Professional development of code and robotics teachers through Small Private Online Course (SPOC): Teacher centrality and pedagogical strategies to promote computational thinking of students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120973432
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The DigiLit Leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 21440. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
   Google Scholar
• Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 59, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatius, R., & Ariyanti, A. (2017). Teacher’s role in managing the class during teaching and learning process. Script Journal, 2(1), 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912445643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Learning groups. In S. A. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 441–461). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., McKenney, S., & Sagy, O. (2015). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science, 43(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, G. Y. (2018). Playing with digital tools with explicit scaffolding. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesler, A., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2021). Active learning by visual programming: Pedagogical perspectives of instructivist and constructivist code teachers and their implications on actual teaching strategies and students’ programming artifacts. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211017793
   Google Scholar
• Kewman, M. L., Sohee, P., Bong, G. J., & Byeong-Young, C. (2019). Multidimensional approaches to examining digital literacies in the Contemporary Global Society. Media and Communication, 7(2), 36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. (2017). Sage on the stage or bore at the board?Communication Education, 66(2), 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1272129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacy and participation in online social networking spaces. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 249–278). Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2018). Education and ‘new literacies’ in the middle years. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 26(2), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Leenknecht, M., & Prins, F. (2018). Formative peer assessment in primary school: The effects of involving pupils in setting assessment criteria on their appraisal and feedback style. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0340-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48(3), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, B., Zhou, H., Liu, C., Guo, X., Liu, J., Jiang, K., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2018). The Relationship between parental involvement and children’s self-efficacy profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(11), 3730–3741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1201-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. D. (2014). From ‘sage on the stage’ to ‘guide on the side’: A good start. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080104
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, I. (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education, 68, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Strengthening online learning when schools are closed: The role of families and teachers in supporting students during the COVID-19 crisis. OECD report. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=136_136615-o13x4bkowa&title=Strengthening-online-learning-when-schools-are-closed
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: Using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00858.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Teachers as designers of TEL interventions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 975–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students’ perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers and Education, 126, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Price-Dennis, D., Holmes, K. A., & Smith, E. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pytash, K., Testa, E., Geise, K., & Kovalchick, C. (2017). Guide on the side: Collaboratively writing and revising with students. Voices from the Middle; Urbana, 25(2), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ranieri, M., Bruni, I., & De Xivry, A. C. O. (2017). Teachers’ professional development on digital and media literacy. Findings and Recommendations from a European Project. Research on Education and Media, 9(2), 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1347534
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, A., Mohammad, R., Lander, B., Shibata, Y., Kim-Eng Lee, C., Kuno, H., & Lau, A. (2019). From “chalk and talk” to “guide on the side”: A cross-cultural analysis of pedagogy that drives customised teaching for personalised learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, R. M. (2017). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2017). Which pedagogical parameters predict the general quality of ICT integration from the perspective of elementary school leaders? Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 168–191.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir-Inbal, T. & Blau, I. (2020). Micro-learning in designing professional development for ICT teacher leaders: The role of self-regulation and perceived learning. Professional Development in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1763434.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir-Inbal, T. & Blau, I. (2021a). Characteristics of pedagogical change in integrating digital collaborative learning and their sustainability in a school culture: e-CSAMR framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12526
   Google Scholar
• Shamir-Inbal, T. & Blau, I. (2021b). Facilitating emergency remote K-12 teaching in computing-enhanced virtual learning environments during COVID-19 pandemic: Blessing or curse?Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992781
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarchi, C., Chuy, M., Donoahue, Z., Stephenson, C., Messina, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Knowledge building and knowledge forum: Getting started with pedagogy and technology. LEARNing Landscapes, 6(2), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v6i2.623
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Spoel, I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E., & Van Ginkel, S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberger, M., Grinshtein, Y., & Blau, I. (2021). How do technological changes in formal education shape the social roles of teachers who are mothers?Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103344
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W. W. (2004). Refuting misconceptions about classroom discussion. The Social Studies, 95(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.95.1.33-39
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R., Ho, F., Wong, W., Tung, K., Chow, C., Rao, N., Chan, K., & Ip, P. (2018). Parental involvement in primary school education: Its relationship with children’s academic performance and psychosocial competence through engaging children with School. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(5), 1544–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-1011-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yondler, Y., Blau, I., Ben-Yehuda, G., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2018). Different but equally effective? Four models for technology-enhanced optimal teaching of digital literacy skills. In Proceedings of the EARLI - Instructional Design & Educational Technology Meeting: Instructional Design and Technology for 21st Century Learning: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions. Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, O., Blau, I., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2009). Children’s participation patterns in online communities: An analysis of Israeli learners in the Scratch online community. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 263–274.
   Google Scholar