K-12 teacher readiness for flipped foreign language teaching: scale development and validation

References

• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L. M., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor analysis. In G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98–122). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bicen, H., & Beheshti, M. (2022). Assessing perceptions and evaluating achievements of ESL students with the usage of infographics in a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(3), 498–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, C.-S., Chin, C. K., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tan, C. L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0071-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H. (2017). A survey of native language teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1349805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-L., Hung, M.-L., Tsai, C.-W., & Chang, Y.-C. (2020). Developing and validating a scale for measuring teachers’ readiness for flipped classrooms in junior high schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copriady, J. (2015). Self-motivation as a mediator for teachers’ readiness in applying ICT in teaching and learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.529
   Google Scholar
• Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020). Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 19(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin, J., James, M., & Lim, J. (2019). “Master validity tool,” AMOS plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title = Main_Page
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gurley, L. E. (2018). Educators’ preparation to teach, perceived teaching presence, and perceived teaching presence behaviors in blended and online learning environments. Online Learning, 22(2), 179–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2021). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H.-T., & Lin, C.-C. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners’ mobile-assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F., Teo, T., & Guo, J. (2021). Understanding English teachers’ non-volitional use of online teaching: A Chinese study. System, 101, 102574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2018). Gamifying the flipped classroom using game-based learning materials. ELT Journal, 72(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M.-L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers & Education, 94, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Zang, N., Zhou, N., & Cao, H. (2022). English teachers’ intention to use flipped teaching: interrelationships with needs satisfaction, motivation, self-efficacy, belief, and support. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1890–1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1846566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., & Harp, C. (2020). Examining preservice teachers’ TPACK, attitudes, self-efficacy, and perceptions of teamwork in a stand-alone educational technology course using flipped classroom or flipped team-based learning pedagogies. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(3), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1752335
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. A. (2011). Comparison of principal components analysis and factor analysis for uncovering the early development instrument (EDI) domains. Community-University Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H.-M., Hsiao, Y.-L., & Hsieh, P.-J. (2018). The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers’ continuance use intention for flipped teaching. Computers & Education, 124, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & Martin, K. I. (2020). The flipped classroom in ESL teacher education: An example from CALL. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2605–2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10082-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B. (2022). Ready for online? Exploring EFL teachers’ ICT acceptance and ICT literacy during COVID-19 in mainland China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 196–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Wang, L., & Koehler, M. J. (2019). Exploring the intention-behavior gap in the technology acceptance model: A mixed-methods study in the context of foreign-language teaching in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2536–2556. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2022). A systematic review of research on technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) for online teaching in the humanities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2139026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, G. (2020). Developing pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge through the creation of digital storybooks for use in early years classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1729234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M., & Son, J.-B. (2020). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp. 169–186). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, B. (2018). Teacher professional development for online and blended learning in adult education and training [Doctor in Educational Sciences Doctoral Dissertation]. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
   Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v30i4.168
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. D., & Li, Z. (2012). Teachers’ technological readiness for online professional development: Evidence from the US e-learning for educators initiative. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2012.707921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015). The big-fish-little-pond-effect revisited: Do different types of assessments matter? Computers & Education, 80, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
   Google Scholar
• Short, C. R., Graham, C. R., Holmes, T., Oviatt, L., & Bateman, H. (2021). Preparing teachers to teach in K-12 blended environments: A systematic mapping review of research trends, impact, and themes. TechTrends, 65(6), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Chen, C., Law, M., Wu, C., Lau, Y., Guan, J., He, D., & Ho, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers & Education, 168, 104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003714632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge—A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y. F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, D., Huang, X., Kohnke, L., Chen, X., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10585–10609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10991-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. (2022). A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1811–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502
   Google Scholar