Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis

References

• Aidinopoulou, V., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237–247. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, E., Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Alebaikan, R. A. (2010). Perceptions of blended learning in Saudi universities [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Exeter. http://hdl.handle.net/10036/117486
   Google Scholar
• Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi, M. M. (2022). Investigating the potential of blended learning to develop critical thinking skills among student teachers in Saudi Arabia [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Leicester. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.19144478.v1
   Google Scholar
• Argyriou, P., Benamar, K., & Nikolajeva, M. (2022). What to blend? Exploring the relationship between student engagement and academic achievement via a blended learning approach. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221091512
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M. A., Mollah, S., Perveen, S., Shabnam, N., & Nahar, L. (2021). The pedagogical applications, prospects, and challenges of blended learning in Chinese higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 772322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Investigating the impact of blended learning on academic performance in a first semester college physics course. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0099-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkun, A. A., Altukhova, I. V., Perova, E. A., Frolova, L. P., & Abibullayev, L. R. (2019). Blended distance-classroom training as an alternative to the traditional classroom training in basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillation. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care", 8(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2019-8-2-145-151
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott Jr, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Jr Alvarez, A., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., . . . Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Skerritt, C., Shevlin, P., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2022). Deconstructing the challenges and opportunities for blended learning in the post emergency learning era. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C. (2016, October). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology 2016. ECAR. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2016/6/∼/media/files/library/2016/10/ers1605.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Çakır, H., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2016). Effects of teacher professional characteristics on student achievement: An investigation in blended learning environment with standards-based curriculum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, A., Muscanell, N. (2022). 2023 Higher Education Trend Watch. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/higher-education-trend-watch/2023.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronje, J. (2020). Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150, 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “Trim and Fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S., Waring, P., Douglas, H. E., Curtis, G. J., & Ritchie, S. M. (2022). Delivering blended learning to transnational students: Students’ perceptions and needs-satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 47(9), 1890–1902. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1983533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E. J., & Dyer, K. (2023). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
   Google Scholar
• Diep, A. N., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., & Blieck, Y. (2017). Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton, D. (2010). Innovation, technology, or history: What is the historiography of technology about. Technology and Culture, 51(3), 680–697. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2010.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, X. Y., Guo, W. R., & Son, J. X. (2021). Teachers’ blended teaching competency development Model: Principles, preparations and strategies. Open Education Research, 27(5), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Ozden, M. Y. (2013). Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire, B. (2022). Blended learning in rural and remote schools: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 253–259). Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Defnition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth analysis of literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
   Google Scholar
• Gültekin, K., & Mede, E. (2023). Blended teaching readiness of EFL instructors and their perceptions about blended learning in English preparatory schools: A case from Turkey. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–17. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2186987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanny, C. N., Arnesen, K. T., Guo, Q., Hansen, J., & Graham, C. R. (2023). Barriers and enablers to K-12 blended teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(4), 568–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1991865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., Bai, S., Dawson, P., & Lo, C. K. (2021a). Meta-analyses of flipped classroom studies: A review of methodology. Educational Research Review, 33, 100393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., Bai, S., Huang, W., Dawson, P., Du, J., Huang, G., Jia, C., & Thankrit, K. (2021b). On the use of flipped classroom across various disciplines: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indriyanti, N., Yamtinah, S., & Muawiyah, D. (2020). An Inquiry into Students’ Metacognition and Learning Achievement in a Blended Learning Design. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.12907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/01972456(95)00134-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jou, M., Lin, Y. T., & Wu, D. W. (2016). Effect of a blended learning environment on student critical thinking and knowledge transformation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1131–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.961485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of teaching methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
   Google Scholar
• Khatony, A., Nayery, N. D., Ahmadi, F., Haghani, H., & Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K. (2009). The effectiveness of web-based and face-to-face continuing education methods on nurses’ knowledge about AIDS: A comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
   Google Scholar
• Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulikowski, K., Przytula, S., & Sulkowski, L. (2021). Emergency forced pandemic e-learning–feedback from students for HEI management. Open Learning, 36(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1942810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, F. R., Hwang, G. J., & Lee, C. C. (2012). A hybrid approach to promoting students’ web-based problem-solving competence and learning attitude. Computers & Education, 58(1), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, D. K., & Sung, C. H. (2009). Comparing student performance: Online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2016). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Qu, J. S. (2021). Review of application and evolution of meta-analysis in social sciences. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 5(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0515
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Zhu, J., Duan, Y., Nie, Y., Deng, Z., Hong, X., Haugen, M., Baker, J. S., & Liang, W. (2022). Development and students’ evaluation of a blended online and offline pedagogy for physical education theory curriculum in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(6), 2235–2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10131-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., Wilkes, S., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). An investigation of blended learning to support reading instruction in elementary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2839–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09785-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1397–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A Meta-Analysis on the Community of Inquiry Presences and Learning Outcomes in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325–359. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Sun, T., Westine, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2022). Examining research on the impact of distance and online learning: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 36, 100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1 < 6::AID-JCOP2290140103 > 3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. K. (2010). A comparison of learning outcomes in a traditional lecture-based versus blended course module using a business simulation with high cognitive load [Doctoral dissertation]. University of San Francisco. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/390
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Owston, R., & York, D. N. (2018). The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter? The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palvia, S. C. J., & Palvia, P. C. (2007). The effectiveness of using computers for software training: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(4), 479–489.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, L., Poortman, C., Schildkamp, K., & Benes, N. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of a sense of community in blended education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11853-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–288. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30057995
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulham, E., & Graham, C. R. (2018). Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: A literature review. Distance Education, 39(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qutieshat, A. S., Abusamak, M. O., & Maragha, T. N. (2020). Impact of blended learning on dental students’ performance and satisfaction in clinical education. Journal of Dental Education, 84(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, J. S. T. (2020). The effect of blended learning on language proficiency of an EFL Class: An empirical study [Master’s thesis]. West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ruchan, U. Z., & Adem, U. Z. U. N. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. G., & Suzuki, S. (2015). Embedded blended learning within an Algebra classroom: A multimedia capture experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Hill, J. (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1517732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senn, G. J. (2008). Comparison of face-to-face and hybrid delivery of a course that requires technology skills development. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7(1), 267–283. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111382/
   Google Scholar
• Short, C. R., Graham, C. R., Holmes, T., Oviatt, L., & Bateman, H. (2021). Preparing teachers to teach in K-12 blended environments: A systematic mapping review of research trends, impact, and themes. TechTrends, 65(6), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2021). The impact of blended discussions on learning motivation and EFL reading performance. Educational Studies, 57(6), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1969932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Spring, K. J., Graham, C. R., & Hadlock, C. A. (2016). The current landscape of international blended learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.075961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring, K. J., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Blended learning citation patterns and publication across seven worldwide regions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 24–50. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, S. H., Perkowski, T., & Martin, L. S. (2011). A framework for evaluating class size in online education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Tambunan, H., Silitonga, M., & Sidabutar, U. B. (2021). Online and face-to-face composition in forming the professional competencies of technical teacher candidates with various learning style types. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2017–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10349-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and subject in higher education. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ustun, A. B., & Tracey, M. W. (2020). An effective way of designing blended learning: A three phase design-based research approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1529–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09999-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Eggen, T. J., Timmers, C. F., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–393. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.2.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandera, S. (2017). Continuing the conversation about face-to-face, online, and blended learning a meta-analysis of empirical literature 2006–2017 [Doctoral dissertation]. Wilmington University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1964254197
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Dev, R. D. O., Soh, K. G., Nasirudddin, N. J. M., Yuan, Y., & Ji, X. (2023). Blended learning in physical education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1073423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Cheng, L. (2020). The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, 156, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. T., Hwang, G. J., Choo Goh, P. S., & Mohd Arrif, S. K. (2020). Effects of blended learning pedagogical practices on students’ motivation and autonomy for the teaching of short stories in upper secondary English. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1542318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Liew, J., & Kogut, A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of self-regulated learning interventions on academic achievement in online and blended environments in K-12 and higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–21. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2151935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Yu, H., & Chen, N. S. (2019). Using blended synchronous classroom approach to promote learning performance in rural area. Computers & Education, 141, 103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., Li, B. M., & Wang, Q. Y. (2022). The effectiveness of 3D holographic technology on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2124424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2023). Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. W., Zhang, M., & Yang, C. X. (2022). Situation, Challenges and Suggestions of College Teachers’ Blended Teaching Readiness. e-Education Research, 345(1), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Berri, S., & Zhang, K. (2021). Effective instructional strategies and technology use in blended learning: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6143–6161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10544-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilka, G. C., Cohen, R., & Rahimi, I. (2018). Teacher presence and social presence in virtual and blended courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.28945/4061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar