Examining the impact on TPACK and knowledge subcomponents in dually certifying secondary mathematics teacher candidates with a Computer Science add-on endorsement

References

• Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
   Google Scholar
• Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2011). Determining Teachers’ TPACK through observations and self-report data. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2314–2319). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2020). Investigating the impact of TPACK development course on pre-service science teachers’ performances. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09653-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & the National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological measurement in education. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L. (2016). Exploring the use of qualitative methods to examine TPACK. In Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 75–96) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, K. H. (2002). Communities of practice: Engagement, imagination, and alignment in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger, J. (2017). Why a lack of STEM teachers could jeopardise the Canada 2067 vision. Canada 2067: The science of a successful tomorrow.
   Google Scholar
• Camera, L. (2019). Sharp nationwide enrollment drop in teacher prep programs cause for alarm. US News & World Report.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College Board (2020). AP Computer Science principles course and exam description. The College Board. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-computer-science-principles-course-and-exam-description.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Computer Science Teachers Association (2013). Bugs in the system: Computer Science teacher certification in the U.S. technical report. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Computer Science Teachers Association Curriculum Improvement Task Force (2005). The new educational imperative: Improving high school Computer Science education. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Services (ETS). (2014). ETS standards for quality and fairness. Author. https://www.ets.org/content/dam/ets-org/pdfs/praxis/validity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest, (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–254) Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gal-Ezer, J. (1995). Computer Science teachers’ certification program. Computers & Education, 25(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(95)00040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal-Ezer, J., & Stephenson, C. (2009). The current state of Computer Science in US high schools: A report from two national surveys. Journal for Computing Teachers, 1(13), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakos, M. N., Doukakis, S., Pappas, I. O., Adamopoulos, N., & Giannopoulou, P. (2015). Investigating teachers’ confidence on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: An initial validation of TPACK scales in K-12 computing education context. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0024-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, J., Livers, S. D., & Zelkowski, J. (2017). Mathematics classroom observation protocol for practices (MCOP2): Validity and reliability. Investigations in Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1308697
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, J., Livers, S. D., Zelkowski, J. (2015). Mathematics classroom observation protocol for practices MCOP2: Descriptive manual. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama. http://jgleason.people.ua.edu/mcop2.html
   Google Scholar
• Google Inc. & Gallup Inc. (2016). Trends in the state of Computer Science in U.S. K-12 schools. http://goo.gl/j291E0.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, R. C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Odom-Bartel, R. L., Zelkowski, J., Hamner, K., & Rogers-Farris, S. (2020). A pre-service pathway for preparing future AP CS Principles teachers. In Heckman, S., Monge, A., & Cutter, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 51st ACTM technical symposium on Computer Science education (pp. 1127–1132). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366945
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero, S. (2017). (ed.) Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
   Google Scholar
• Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P., & Kelly, N. (2012). Integrating technology, pedagogy and content in mathematics education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(4), 387–413.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K., McCulloch, A. W., & Lee, H. S. (2016). Prospective teachers’ incorporation of technology in mathematics lesson plans. In M. Niess (Ed.), Handbook of research on transforming mathematics teacher education in the digital age (pp. 272–292). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.201807_21(3).0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M., & Bridgeman, B, M. von Davier ((2017). Research on validity theory and practice at ETS. In R.E. Bennett (Eds.), Advancing human assessment: The methodological, psychological and policy contributions of ETS (pp. 489–552). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury, G. (2007). Computer Science state certification requirements. CSTA Certification Committee Report. http://csta.acm.org/ComputerScienceTeacherCertification/sub/CertificationResearch.html
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure (NCES 2008-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK: Let me count the ways. In R. R. Ronau, C. R. rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16–31) IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning Policy Institute (2018). Understanding teacher shortages: 2018 update.
   Google Scholar
• Leatham, K., et al. (2008). The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge in “technology, pedagogy and mathematics” courses in the U.S. In K. McFerrin (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2008 (pp. 5277–5283). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Livers, S. D., Zelkowski, J., Harbour, K. E., McDaniel, S., & Gleason, J. (2020). An examination of the relationships of mathematics self-efficacy and teaching practices among elementary, secondary, and special education teachers. Investigations in Mathematical Learning, 12(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1670891
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C. J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouza, C., Yang, H., Pan, Y. C., Ozden, S. Y., & Pollock, L. (2017). Resetting educational technology coursework for pre-service teachers: A computational thinking approach to the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Odom-Bartel, B., Zelkowski, J., & Gray, J. (2021). Preparing secondary education mathematics teacher candidates for AP Computer Science Principles: A two-course design model. In Mouza, C., Yadav, A., and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (Eds.), Preparing pre-service teachers to teach Computer Science: Models, practices, and policies (pp. 153–172). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ofem, B., Polizzi, S. J., Rushton, G. T., Beeth, M., Couch, B., Doering, J., Konz, R., Mohr-Schroeder, M., Roehrig, G., & Sheppard, K. (2021). Looking at our STEM teacher workforce: How to model self-efficacy. Economic Development Quarterly, 35(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242420973758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partelow, L. (2019). What to make of declining enrollment in teacher preparation programs. Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D. (2014). Deepening pre-service teachers’ knowledge of technology, pedagogy, and content (TPACK) in an elementary school mathematics methods course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(2), 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., Glennon, M. O., Weissman, H., Fletcher, C., Dunton, S., Baskin, J., Mak, J. (2022). State of Computer Science education: Understanding our national imperative. Code.org, CSTA, & ECEP Alliance. https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs
   Google Scholar
• Ronau, R. N., Rakes, C. R., Bush, S. B., Driskell, S. O., Niess, M. L., & Pugalee, D. K. (2014). A survey of mathematics education technology dissertation scope and quality: 1968–2009. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 974–1006. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, 112, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, P. G., & Lawless, K. A. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement, 43(9), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430905
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., & Luellen, J. K. (2012). Quasi-experimental design. In Green, J.L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P.B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 539–550) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE). (2020). Recommended professional performance standards. https://www.edtpa.com/PageView.aspx?f=GEN_PerformanceStandard.html
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štuikys, V., Burbaitė, R., Bespalova, K., & Ziberkas, G. (2016). Model-driven processes and tools to design robot-based generative learning objects for Computer Science education. Science of Computer Programming, 129, 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The White House (2016). Fact sheet: President Obama announces Computer Science for all initiative. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-pressoffice/2016/01/30/factsheet-president-obama-announces-computer-science-all-initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. J. (1985). Computer Science in secondary schools: Curriculum and teacher certification. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voithofer, R., & Nelson, M. J. (2021). Teacher educator technology integration preparation practices around TPACK in the United States. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120949842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, C. K., & Hallman, H. L. (2017). A communities of practice approach to field experiences in teacher education. Brock Education Journal, 26(2), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v26i2.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., & Korb, J. T. (2012). Learning to teach Computer Science: The need for a methods course. Communications of the ACM, 55(11), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2366316.2366327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J. (2011a). Developing secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Influencing positive change. In Maddux C.D., Gibson, D., Dodge, B., Owen, C., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2011 (pp. 31–38). Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/38606/
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J. (2011b). The TI-Nspire CAS: A happy-medium mobile device for grades 9–16 mathematics classrooms. TechTrends, 55(3), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0496-6
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J. (2013). Making sense of extraneous solutions. Mathematics Teacher, 106(6), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.106.6.0452
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Campbell, T. G., & Gleason, J. (2018). Programmatic effects of capstone math content and math methods courses on teacher licensure exams. In Smith, W.M., Lawler, B.R., Strayer, J.F. & Augustyn, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Annual Mathematics Teacher Education – Partnership Conference (pp. 91–96) Association of Public Land-grant Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Campbell, T. G., & Moldavan, A. M. (2024b). The relationships between internal program measures and a high-stakes teacher licensing measure in mathematics teacher preparation: Program design considerations. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231180214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., & Gleason, J. (2016). Using the MCOP2 as a grade bearing assessment of clinical field observations. In Lawler, B.R., Ronau, R.N. & Mohr-Schroeder, M.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th annual mathematics teacher education – Partnership conference (pp. 129–138). Association of Public Land-grant Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., & Gleason, J. (2018). Programmatic effects on high stakes measures in secondary math teacher preparation. In Venenciano, L. and Redmond-Sanogo, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual meeting of the research council on mathematics learning (pp. 169–176). https://www.rcml-math.org/assets/Proceedings/rcml%20proceedings%202018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D., & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782618
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Makowski, M. B., Campbell, T. G., Gleason, J., Thomas, C. A., Mudd, A., Lewis, A. K., Gooden, C., & Smith, F. A. (2024a). Leveraging longitudinal and annual analyses to improve program design: Considering teacher education standards and professional recommendations. In Benken, B. (Ed.), Reflection on past, present and future: Paving the way for the future of mathematics teacher education (pp. 447–475). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Odom-Bartel, R. L., & Gray, J. (2022b). Integrating Computer Science teacher certification into a secondary mathematics teacher preparation program: The highlights. AMTE Connections, 32(1), 1–6. Retrieved from https://amte.net/connections/2022/05/connections-thematic-articles-integration-mathematics-teacher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Yow, J., Waller, P., Edwards, B. P., Anthony, H. G., Campbell, T. G., Keefe, A., & Wilson, C. (2022c). Linking the field-based mentor teacher to university coursework: Methods course modules for completing the triad of learning for mathematics teacher candidates. In Polly, D. & Garin, E. (Eds.), Preparing quality teachers: Advances in clinical practice (pp. 579–608). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J. (2011c). Teaching mathematics with technology: A longitudinal study of secondary preservice teacher Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) development. Paper presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AERA Online Paper Repository. https://www.aera.net/Publications/Online-Paper-Repository/AERA-Online-Paper-Repository
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., & Campbell, T. G. (2020). Praxis II and edTPA effect sizes of teacher preparation program design: A path analysis study. Paper presented at the 2020 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AERA Online Paper Repository. https://doi.org/10.3102/1571148
   Google Scholar
• Zelkowski, J., Odom-Bartel, R. L., & Gray, J. (2022a). Two-course sequence and modules for adding Computer Science credential into secondary mathematics teacher preparation. Paper presented at the 2022 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AERA Online Paper Repository. https://doi.org/10.3102/1892543
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., & Wang, C. (2023). K-12 Computer Science teaching strategies, challenges, and teachers’ professional development opportunities and needs. Computers in the Schools, 41(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2178868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar