Design of a tuned vibration absorber for a slender hollow cylindrical structure

References

• ABAQUS 6.12 Analysis User’s Manual. 2012. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, T., G. O. Özgen, B. Acar, and C. Gençoğlu. 2016. Experimental characterization of a tuned vibration absorber. In Sensors and Instrumentation, Volume 5: Proceedings of the 34th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2016. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, ed. E. Wee Sit. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29859-7_18.
   Google Scholar
• Allemang, R. J. 1999. Vibrations: Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis. UC-SDRL-CN-20. -263–-662. Structural Dynamics Research Laboratory (SDRL). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Allemang, R.J. 2003. The modal assurance criterion - twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and Vibration. August 2003:14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J., J. Hwang, J. Park, and D. Kwag. 2009. Modeling and experiments on eddy current damping caused by a permanent magnet in a conductive tube. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (11):3024–35. doi: 10.1007/s12206-009-0819-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, J., J. Hwang, J. Roh, J. Kim, M. Yi, and J. H. Lim. 2012. Vibration suppression of a cantilever beam using magnetically tuned-mass-damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration 331 (26):5669–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsel, J. H., R. H. Fey, and H. Nijmeijer. 2004. Application of a dynamic vibration absorber to a piecewise linear beam system. Nonlinear Dynamics 37 (3):227–43. Nody. doi: 10.1023/b0000044646.70030.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budynass, R.G., and J.K. Nisbett. 2008. Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design. 8th ed. 501–50. USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Büyükcivelek, F. 2011. Analysis and Control of Gun Barrel Vibrations. M.Sc. Thesis., Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12613942/index.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and C. T. Georgaki. 2013. Tuned rolling-ball dampers for vibration control in wind turbines. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332 (21):5271–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A.J. 1988. Multiple passive tuned mass dampers for reducing earthquake induced building motion. Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 2–9, 1988, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, Vol. V, 779–84. 9WCEE Org. Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, B., M. B. Khamesee, and M. F. Golnaraghi. 2008. Design and modeling of a magnetic shock absorber based on eddy current damping effect. Journal of Sound and Vibration 315 (4–5):875–89. 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, S., V. Matsagar, and T. Datta. 2016. Effectiveness of distributed tuned mass dampers for multi-mode control of chimney under earthquakes. Engineering Structures 124. :1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enevoldsen, I., and K. J. Mørk. 1996. Effects of a vibration mass damper in a wind turbine tower. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 24 (2):155–87. doi: 10.1080/08905459608905260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fladung, W., A, and D. L. Jr. Brown. 2003. Multiple reference impact testing. Proceedings of the 11th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), v.2, 1221–9. Schenectady, NY: Society for Experimental Mechanics (U.S.), Union College.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, M., C. Chang, W. Wu, and H. Xiang. 1998. Increase of critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges using tuned mass dampers. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 73 (2):111–23. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00282-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, K. D., E. M. Johnson, A. Brokken, and S. Baldwin. 1998. Eddy current damping of a magnet moving through a pipe. American Journal of Physics 66 (12):1066–76. doi: 10.1119/1.19060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. F. 2003. Multi-Degree of freedom passive and active vibration absorbers for the control of structural vibration. M.Sc. Thesis., Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kathe, E. 2001. Gun Barrel Vibration Absorber. U.S. Patent No. 6,167,794, filed December 7, 1998, and issued Jan 02, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S.G. 2012. Mechanical Vibrations Theory and Applications. Stamford, USA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kienholtz, D. A., S. C. Pendleton, K. E. Richards, Jr., and D. R. Morgenthaler. 1994. Demonstration of solar array vibration suppression. Paper presented in Smart Structures and Materials 1994: Passive Damping, 14–16 February 1994, Orlando, FL. SPIE Proceedings Series 2193:59–72. doi: 10.1117/12.174115.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C., C. Hu, J. Wang, and R. Hu. 1994. Vibration control effectiveness of passive tuned mass dampers. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 17 (3):367–76. doi: 10.1080/02533839.1994.9677600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., J. Ueng, and T. Huang. 2000. Seismic response reduction of irregular buildings using passive tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures 22 (5):513–24. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00054-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlefield, A., and E. Kathe. 2002. Adaptive Gun Barrel Vibration Absorber. ARCCB-TR-02003. US Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, Close Combat Armament Center, Benét Laboratories, Watervliet, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Lalanne, C. 2009. Mechanical Shock and Vibration Analysis, Mechanical Shock. Vol. 2, 2nd ed., London, United Kingdom: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, J., and K. Napolitano. 1993. A magnetic tuned-mass damper for buffet induced airfoil vibration. In Proceedings of Damping'93 Volume 2 of 3, ed. B. L. Portis, Paper no: FAA. Dayton, OH: Air Force Wright Laboratory, Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
   Google Scholar
• MAURER Söhne 2011. Tuned Mass and Viscous Dampers. [Brochure]. Germany: Author. Accessed February 11, 2018 http://trelleborg.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/MaurerTunedMassandViscousDampers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moog CSA Engineering. (n.d.). Tuned Mass Dampers M-Series Resonant Device. [Brochure]. USA: Author. Accessed January 5, 2018 http://www.csaengineering.com/literature/Space_Defense/Vibration_Control/MoogCSA_TMDmseries.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nashif, A. D., D. I. Jones, and J. P. Henderson. 1985. Vibration Damping. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Özgüven, H., and B. Çandır. 1986. Suppressing the first and second resonances of beams by dynamic vibration absorbers. Journal of Sound and Vibration 111 (3):377–90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(86)81399-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, B., H. Van der Auweraer, P. Guillaume, and J. Leuridan. 2004. The PolyMAX frequency-domain method: A new standard for modal parameter estimation? Shock and Vibration 11 (3–4):395–409. doi: 10.1155/2004/523692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preformed Line Products. 2011. Dogbone® Vibration Damper. [Brochure]. Cleveland, OH, USA: Author. Accessed May 18, 2018, from http://preformed.com/images/pdfs/Energy/Transmission/Motion_Control/Dogbone_Damper/en-ss-1090dogbeng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sayyad, F. B., and N. D. Gadhave. 2013. Study of magnetic vibration absorber with permanent magnets along vibrating beam structure. Journal of Structures 2013:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2013/658053.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., H. Pal, and S.R. Dutta. 2011. Vibration control of cantilever beam based on eddy current damping. Advances in Applied Science Research 2 (6):429–38.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, J. C., A. A. Wolfe, and R. L. Kerlin. 1984. The cruciform dynamic vibration absorber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75 (6):1792–9. doi: 10.1121/1.390980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodano, H. A., J. Bae, D. J. Inman, and W. K. Belvin. 2005. Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam. Journal of Sound and Vibration 288 (4–5):1177–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, P., M. Sharma, S. Sharma, and N. Kumar. 2019. A novel strategy for effectively implementing a typical AVC scheme using finite element model updating. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines. doi: 10.1080/15397734.2019.1619578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T. H., and R. M. Lin. 2004. Dual-Mass dynamic absorber for the head actuator assembly in hard disk drives. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 32 (2):119–32. doi: 10.1081/SME-120030552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T. H., X. D. Chen, and R. M. Lin. 2007. Vibration characteristics of disks-spindle system in hard disk drives. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 35 (1):97–112. doi: 10.1080/15397730601009302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T. H., H. Y. Pu, C. Xu, Q. Li, R.M. Lin, and X.D. Chen. 2010. Dynamic Absorber Design for Actuator Arm of Hard Disk Drives to Improve Impact Resistance. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 38 (1):50–73. doi: 10.1080/15397730903389634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, L., and S. Nayfeh. 2004. Minimax optimization of multi-degree-of-freedom tuned-mass dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration 272 (3–5):893–908. 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00500-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VICODA. (n.d.). Isolating, Damping, Tuning. [Brochure]. Germany: Author. Accessed December 5 https://www.vicodagroup.com/news/79-updated-product-brochure-available.html
   Google Scholar