References
- Bayo, E., J. García de Jalon, and M. Serna. 1988. A modified lagrangian formulation for the dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 71 (2):183–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90085-0.
- Bayo, E., and R. Ledesma. 1996. Augmented Lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics 9 (1-2):113–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833296.
- Blanchard, E., A. Sandu, and C. Sandu. 2009. Parameter estimation for mechanical systems via an explicit representation of uncertainty. Engineering Computations 26 (5):541–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400910970185.
- Blanchard, E., A. Sandu, and C. Sandu. 2010a. A polynomial chaos-based Kalman filter approach for parameter estimation of mechanical systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 132 (6):18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002481.
- Blanchard, E., A. Sandu, and C. Sandu. 2010b. Polynomial chaos based parameter estimation methods for vehicle systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 224 (1):59–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1243/14644193JMBD204.
- Blanchard, E., C. Sandu, and A. Sandu. 2010c. Polynomial chaos based numerical method for the lqr problem with uncertain parameters in the formulation. In ASME 2010 IDETC, 12th Advanced Vehicle and Tire Technology Conference (AVTT), DETC2010-28467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2010-28467.
- Bottasso, C., D. Dopico, and L. Trainelli. 2008. On the optimal scaling of index three daes in multibody dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics 19 (1-2):3–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-007-9051-9.
- Cao, Y., S. Li, L. Petzold, and R. Serban. 2003. Adjoint sensitivity analysis for differential-algebraic equations: The adjoint dae system and its numerical solution. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 24 (3):1076–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827501380630.
- Chung, J., and G. Hulbert. 1993. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-alpha method. Journal of Applied Mechanics 60 (2):371–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2900803.
- Corner, S., C. Sandu, and A. Sandu. 2019. Modeling and sensitivity analysis methodology for hybrid dynamical systems. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 31:19–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2018.07.003.
- Corner, S., C. Sandu, and A. Sandu. 2020. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of hybrid multibody dynamical systems. Multibody System Dynamics 49 (4):395–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09726-0.
- Cuadrado, J., R. Gutierrez, M. Naya, and P. Morer. 2001. A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non-linear FEA code. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 51 (9):1033–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.191.
- Dopico, D., F. González, J. Cuadrado, and J. Kövecses. 2014. Determination of holonomic and nonholonomic constraint reactions in an index-3 augmented Lagrangian formulation with velocity and acceleration projections. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 9 (4):041006–041006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027671.
- Dopico, D., F. González, A. Luaces, M. Saura, and D. García-Vallejo. 2018. Direct sensitivity analysis of multibody systems with holonomic and nonholonomic constraints via an index-3 augmented lagrangian formulation with projections. Nonlinear Dynamics 93 (4):2039–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4306-y.
- Dopico, D., F. González, M. Saura, and D. G. Vallejo. 2017. Forward sensitivity analysis of the index-3 augmented lagrangian formulation with projections. In Proceeding of the 8th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics.
- Dopico, D., A. Luaces, U. Lugrís, M. Saura, F. González, E. Sanjurjo, and R. Pastorino. 2016. Mbslim: Multibody systems en laboratorio de ingeniería mecánica, 2009. https://lim.ii.udc.es/MBSLIM/
- Dopico, D., A. Sandu, C. Sandu, and Y. Zhu. 2014. Sensitivity analysis of multibody dynamic systems modeled by ODEs and DAEs. In Multibody dynamics: Computational methods and applications, 1–32, chapter 1. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07260-9.
- Dopico, D., Y. Zhu, A. Sandu, and C. Sandu. 2013. Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of multibody systems using maggi’s equations. In Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences &Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. IDETC/CIE 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12696.
- Dopico, D., Y. Zhu, A. Sandu, and C. Sandu. 2015. Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of ordinary differential equation multibody formulations. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 10 (1):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026492.
- Garcia de Jalon, J., and E. Bayo. 1994. Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems: The real-time challenge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- García de Jalón, J., and M. Gutierrez-López. 2013. Multibody dynamics with redundant constraints and singular mass matrix: Existence, uniqueness, and determination of solutions for accelerations and constraint forces. Multibody System Dynamics 30 (3):311–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-013-9358-7.
- Garcia Orden, J. C. 2010. Energy considerations for the stabilization of constrained mechanical systems with velocity projection. Nonlinear Dynamics 60:49–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9579-8.
- Garcia Orden, J., and S. Conde. 2012. Controllable velocity projection for constraint stabilization in multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics 68:245–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0224-y.
- Garcia Orden, J., and D. Dopico. 2007. Multibody dynamics: Computational methods and applications, chapter on the stabilizing properties of energy-momentum integrators and coordinate projections for constrained mechanical systems, 49–68. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Haug, E. 1987. Computer aided optimal design: Structural and mechanical systems, chapter Design sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems. Number 27 in NATO ASI series. Series F, Computer and systems sciences. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Haug, E. 2020. Well posed formulations of holonomic mechanical system dynamics and design sensitivity analysis. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 48 (1):111–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2019.1668278.
- Jiao, Y., Q. Jin, X. Lu, and W. Wang. 2016. Alternating direction method of multipliers for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 54 (4):2114–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1029308.
- Karta, M., and E. Çelik. 2012. On the numerical solution of differential-algebraic equations with hessenberg index-3. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2012:1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/147240.
- Newmark, N. M. 1959. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 85 (3):67–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098.
- Nocedal, J., and S. Wright. 1999. Numerical optimization. Springer series in operations research. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Petzold, L., S. Li, Y. Cao, and R. Serban. 2006. Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations and partial differential equations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 30 (10-12):1553–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.05.015.
- Schaffer, A. 2005. Stability of the adjoint differential-algebraic equation of the index-3 multibody system equation of motion. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 26 (4):1432–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/030601983.
- Schaffer, A. 2006. Stabilized index-1 differential-algebraic formulations for sensitivity analysis of multi-body dynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 220 (3):141–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1243/1464419JMBD62.
- Serban, R., and A. Recuero. 2019. Sensitivity analysis for hybrid systems and systems with memory. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 14 (9):091006.
- Zhu, Y., C. Sandu, D. Dopico, and A. Sandu. 2018. Benchmarking of adjoint sensitivity-based optimization techniques using a vehicle ride case study. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46 (2):254–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2017.1338576.