Performance analysis of composite laminates wing skin with the aid of fluid structure interaction of aerodynamic loading-structural analysis

References

• Aftab, S. M., and K. A. Ahmad. 2017. Correction: CFD study on NACA 4415 airfoil implementing spherical and sinusoidal tubercle leading edge. Plos One 12 (8):E0183456. (PLoS One 12 (11):1–27. doi:10.1371/Journal.Pone.0183456).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aftab, S. M., A. S. Mohd Rafie, N. A. Razak, and K. A. Ahmad. 2016. Turbulence model selection for low Reynolds number flows. Plos One 11 (4):1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsulami, A., M. Akbar, and W. Y. Joe. 2017. A comparative study: Aerodynamics of morphed airfoils using CFD techniques and analytical tools. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), Tampa, FL, vol. 1: 1–10. doi:10.1115/IMECE2017-72269.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, M. I., and A. Kumar. 2019. Bending analysis of functionally graded CNT reinforced doubly curved singly ruled truncated rhombic cone. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 47 (1):67–86. doi:10.1080/15397734.2018.1519635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attene, F., F. Balduzzi, A. Bianchini, and M. S. Campobasso. 2020. Using experimentally validated Navier-Stokes CFD to minimize tidal stream turbine power losses due to wake/turbine interactions. Sustainability 12 (21):2–26. doi:10.3390/su12218768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, M., H. Parviainen, and A. Pramila. 1992. Accuracy of the finite element method in analyzing laminated plate and pipe structures. Mechanics of Composite Materials 28 (3):236–45. doi:10.1007/BF00604915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, S., A. A. Basri, B. Ernnie Illyani, and H. M. Y. Muhamad. 2021. Effects of different thickness of UAV airfoil on aerodynamics performance using CFD techniques. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation 53 (2):275–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri, A. A., M. Zuber, E. I. Basri, M. S. Zakaria, A. F. A. Aziz, M. Tamagawa, and K. A. Ahmad. 2020. Fluid structure interaction on paravalvular leakage of transcatheter aortic valve implantation related to aortic stenosis: A patient-specific case. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2020:9163085. doi:10.1155/2020/9163085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri, A. A.,M. Zuber, E. I. Basri, M. S. Zakaria, A. F. A. Aziz, M. Tamagawa, and K. A. Ahmad. 2021. Fluid-structure interaction in problems of patient specific transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without paravalvular leakage complication. Fluid Dynamics and Materials Processing 17 (3):531–53.
   Google Scholar
• Basri, E. I., A. A. Basri, et al. 2019. UAV NACA4415 wing structural performance analysis subjected to external aerodynamic load using Schrenk’s approximation. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 60 (2):178–90.
   Google Scholar
• Basri, E. I., F. Mustapha, M. T. H. Sultan, A. A. Basri, M. F. Abas, M. S. A. Majid, and K. A. Ahmad. 2019. Conceptual design and simulation validation based finite element optimisation for tubercle leading edge composite wing of an unmanned aerial vehicle. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 8 (5):4374–86. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.049.
   Google Scholar
• Basri, E. I., M. T. H. Sultan, A. A. Basri, F. Mustapha, and K. A. Ahmad. 2021. Consideration of lamination structural analysis in a multi-layered composite and failure analysis on wing design application. Materials 14 (13):3705. doi:10.3390/ma14133705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri, E. I., M. T. Sultan, M. Faizal, A. A. Basri, M. F. Abas, M. A. Majid, J. S. Mandeep, and K. A. Ahmad. 2019. Performance analysis of composite ply orientation in aeronautical application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) NACA4415 wing. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 8 (5):3822–34. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.044.
   Google Scholar
• Birman, V., and G. A. Kardomateas. 2018. Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures. Composites Part B: Engineering 142:221–40. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, A. W. 2014. Fluid-structure interaction simulations of a flapping wing micro air vehicle. Master thesis, Wright State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chaubey, A. K., A. Kumar, and A. Chakrabarti. 2018. Novel shear deformation model for moderately thick and deep laminated composite conoidal shell. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46 (5):650–68. doi:10.1080/15397734.2017.1422433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, H., and P. E. F. Aguiniga. 2005. Analysis of laminated composites: A web-based computer program based on classical lamination theory. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Fairuz, Z. M., M. Z. Abdullah, M. Zubair, M. Abdul Mujeebu, M. K. Abdullah, H. Yusoff, and M. S. Abdul Aziz. 2016. Effect of wing deformation on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings: Fluid-structure interaction approach. Journal of Aerospace Engineering 29 (4):28–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, A. F. A. et al. 2021. Propeller design and performance evaluation by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD): A review. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation 53 (2):263–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, A. F. A. 2022. Aerodynamics effects of APC slow flyer propeller blade design with different airfoil origin positions. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation 54 (3):325–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferziger, J. H., and M. Peric. 2002. Vasa Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Gamino, M., S. Abankwa, and R. Pascali. 2013. FSI methodology for analyzing VIV on subsea piping components with practical boundary conditions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering – OMAE 7, Nantes, France. doi:10.1115/OMAE2013-10419.
   Google Scholar
• Serdar Genç, M., G. Lock, and Ü. Kaynak. 2008. An experimental and computational study of low Re number transitional flows over an aerofoil with leading edge slat. In 8th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, September 1–16, Anchorage, AK.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoddoussi, A., and L. Scott Miller. 2012. A conceptual study of airfoil performance enhancements using CFD. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 2012, August 1–18. doi:10.2514/6.2012-4655.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzki, W., and A. Łukaszewicz. 2015. Design and manufacture of umanned aerial vehicles (UAV) wing structure using composite materials. Materialwissenschaft Und Werkstofftechnik 46 (3):269–78. doi:10.1002/mawe.201500351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashin, Z. 1980. Failure criteria for unidirectional fibre composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics 47 (2):329–34. doi:10.1115/1.3153664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley, S. J., B. K. Woods, and C. B. Allen. 2019. Computational analysis of the aerodynamics of camber morphing. AIAA Avia 2019 Forum (June 17-21), Dallas, TX, 1–20. doi:10.2514/6.2019-2914.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, J. C. 2004. Fluid-structure interactions. In Encyclopedia of life support systems. Chapter: Physical sciences, Engineering and Technology Resources, eds. Y. W. Kwon and P.-S. Lam, 1–12. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kamakoti, R., and W. Shyy. 2004. Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 40 (8):535–58. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, N. N. M., et al. 2019. Comparison study between Schrenk’s approximation method and computational fluid dynamics of aerodynamic loading on UAV NACA 4415 wing. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 2 (2):283–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kanesan, G., S. Mansor, and A. Abdul-Latif. 2014. Validation of UAV wing structural model for finite element analysis. Jurnal Teknologi 71 (2):1–5. doi:10.11113/jt.v71.3710.
   Google Scholar
• Kavya, G., and B. R. Reddy. 2015. Design and finite element analysis of aircraft wing using ribs and spars. International Journal and Magazine of Engineering, Technology, Management and Research 2 (11):1443–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kotousov, A., and C. Hui Wang. 2002. Fundamental solutions for the generalised plane strain theory. International Journal of Engineering Science 40 (15):1775–90. doi:10.1016/S0020-7225(02)00041-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., P. Bhargava, and A. Chakrabarti. 2013. Vibration of laminated composite skew hypar shells using higher order theory. Thin-Walled Structures 63:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., A. Chakrabarti, and P. Bhargava. 2013. Vibration of laminated composites and sandwich shells based on higher order zigzag theory. Engineering Structures 56:880–8. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinoth Kumar, T. S., A. W. Basha, M. Pavithra, and V. Srilekha. 2015. Static & dynamic analysis of a typical aircraft wing structure using MSC Nastran. International Journal of Research in Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering 3 (8):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-G., and C. Kim. 2012. Fluid-structure interaction analysis for UAV wing design optimization. Korean Conference on Industrial and Applied Mathematics 7 (1):107–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite, M. T., and C. V. Amaechi. 2022. Numerical investigation of winglet aerodynamics and dimple effect of NACA 0017 airfoil for a freight aircraft. Inventions 7 (1):31. doi:10.3390/inventions7010031.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez López, A., I. Pérez Reyes, A. López Villa, and R. O. Vargas Aguilar. 2016. Stochastic simulation for couette flow of dilute polymer solutions using Hookean dumbbells. In Recent advances in fluid dynamics with environmental applications, ed. J. Klapp. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 217–28.
   Google Scholar
• Menter, F. R. 1992. Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. NASA Technical Memorandum 103978: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. C., Markus, P. R., and J. J. James, 2015. Fluid-structure interaction of a variable camber compliant wing. In 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Florida , 1–12. doi:10.2514/6.2015-1235/5Cn.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, B. B., A. Kumar, and U. Topal. 2020. Stochastic normal mode frequency analysis of hybrid angle ply laminated composite skew plate with opening using a novel approach. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 1–35. doi:10.1080/15397734.2020.1840393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa, N. H., Z. N. Ismarrubie, S. M. Sapuan, and M. T. Sultan. 2016. The influence of equi-biaxially fabric prestressing on the flexural performance of woven E-glass/polyester-reinforced composites. Journal of Composite Materials 50 (24):3385–93. doi:10.1177/0021998315620478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabillah, N, et al. 2020. Validation and verification of aerodynamics loading of Schrenk approximation, Prandtl lifting-line and computational fluid dynamics with. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation 53:283–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, W., Y. Zhang, H. Chen, and M. Zhang. 2020. Numerical study of a supercritical airfoil/wing with variable-camber technology. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 33 (7):1850–66. doi:10.1016/j.cja.2020.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurhaniza, M., M. K. A. Ariffin, A. Ali, F. Mustapha, and A. W. Noraini. 2010. Finite element analysis of composites materials for aerospace applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 11 (1):012010(1)–012010(7). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/11/1/012010.
   Google Scholar
• Paradies, R., and P. Ciresa. 2009. Active wing design with integrated flight control using piezoelectric macro fiber composites. Smart Materials and Structures 18 (3):035010. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/3/035010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, R. S. 2012. Coupled fluid structure interaction analysis on a cylinder exposed to ocean wave loading. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, S. D., M. J. Sharba, Z. Leman, M. T. H. Sultan, M. R. Ishak, and F. Cardona. 2016. Tension-compression fatigue behavior of plain woven kenaf/kevlar hybrid composites. BioResources 11 (2):3575–86. doi:10.15376/biores.11.2.3575-3586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman, S. D., Z. Leman, M. T. H. Sultan, M. R. Ishak, and F. Cardona. 2017. Effect of kenaf fibers on trauma penetration depth and ballistic impact resistance for laminated composites. Textile Research Journal 87 (17):2051–65. doi:10.1177/0040517516663155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, S., T. Lutz, and E. Krämer. 2009. Impact of modelling approaches on the prediction of ground effect aerodynamics. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 3 (3):419–29. doi:10.1080/19942060.2009.11015280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig, M. S., and B. D. McGranahan. 1995. Summary of low speed airfoil data, vol. 5. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Shabeer, K. P., and M. A. Murtaza. 2013. Optimization of aircraft wing with composite material. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2 (6):2471–7.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J., J. Singh, A. Singh, A. Rana, and A. Dahiya. 2015. Study of NACA 4412 and Selig 1223 airfoils through computational fluid dynamics. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2 (6):17–21. doi:10.14445/23488360/IJME-V2I6P104.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J. 2008. Computational fluid-structure interaction of a deformable flapping wing for micro air vehicle applications. In 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhoydonck, B., G. Santo, J. Vierendeels, and J. Degroote. 2016. Optimization of a human-powered aircraft using fluid–structure interaction simulations. Aerospace 3 (3):26–47. doi:10.3390/aerospace3030026.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. 2016. Design, modeling and control of trailing edge morphing UAV. Thesis, Wichita State University, KS.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, B. K. S., and M. I. Friswell. 2013. Fluid–structure interaction analysis of the fish bone active camber mechanism. In 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yazik, M. H. M., M. Tamagawa, M. T. H. Sultan, and A. Adzrif. 2020. Computational study on aerodynamic characteristics and behaviour of S5010 airfoil. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 66 (1):42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, A., Z. Hui, H. Jin, and D. Wen. 2019. Analysis on the aerodynamic characteristics of a continuous whole variable camber airfoil. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1215 (1):012005. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1215/1/012005.
   Google Scholar