Analysis of the influence of CA mortar layer void on the dynamic performance of high-speed trains

References

• Antolín, P., N. Zhang, J. M. Goicolea, H. Xia, M. Á. Astiz, and J. Oliva. 2013. Consideration of nonlinear wheel–rail contact forces for dynamic vehicle–bridge interaction in high-speed railways. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332 (5):1231–51. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2012.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi, B., G. Muscolino, and A. Sofi. 2005. A substructure approach for the dynamic analysis of train–track–bridge system. Computers & Structures 83 (28–30):2271–81. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Lorenzo, J., J. Santamaria, E. G. Vadillo, and O. Oyarzabal. 2011. Dynamic comparison of different types of slab track and ballasted track using a flexible track model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 225 (6):574–92. doi:10.1177/0954409711401516.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., L. Jiang, Z. Lai, and J. Li. 2023. A novel evaluation of train running safety on the HSR bridges under earthquakes based on the observed track deformation rate. Engineering Structures 275:115260. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvín, P., A. Romero, and J. Domínguez. 2010. Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil-structure dynamic interaction. Journal of Sound and Vibration 329 (24):5147–63. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. 2015. Effect of softening of cement asphalt mortar on vehicle operation safety and track dynamics. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A 16:976–86. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1500080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusz, Z., J. Tarasinska, and W. Zielinski. 2016. Shapiro-Wilk test with known mean. REVSTAT-Statistical Journal 14:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Locomotive and Vehicle, Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Railways. 1993. Railway locomotive dynamic performance test evaluation method and evaluation standard. Industry Standard - Railway (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Jahangiri, M., and J.-A. Zakeri. 2017. Dynamic analysis of train-bridge system under one-way and two-way high-speed train passing. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 64:33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., J. Yu, W. Zhou, W. Yan, Z. Lai, and Y. Feng. 2020. Applicability analysis of high-speed railway system under the action of near-fault ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 139:106289. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kun, L., X. Lei, and S. Zeng. 2017. Influence analysis on the effect of rail fastening parameters on the vibration response of track–bridge system. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 9 (8):168781401770283. doi:10.1177/1687814017702839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Z., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, J. Yu, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and W. Zhou. 2022. Lateral girder displacement effect on the safety and comfortability of the high-speed rail train operation. Vehicle System Dynamics 60 (9):3215–39. doi:10.1080/00423114.2021.1942507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, X., and B. Zhang. 2011. Analysis of dynamic behavior for slab track of high-speed railway based on vehicle and track elements. Journal of Transportation Engineering 137 (4):227–40. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000207.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., X. Liu, and G. Li. 2014. Influence of CA mortar void on dynamic characteristics of unit slab track on bridge. China Railway Science 35:20–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., Q. Su, and S. Kaewunruen. 2020. Influences of dynamic material properties of slab track components on the train-track vibration interactions. Engineering Failure Analysis 115:104633. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., L. Liang, and D. Wang. 2018. Vibration and noise characteristics of an elevated box girder paved with different track structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration 425:21–40. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2018.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Y-f Liu, J-j Ren, R-s Yang, and X-y Liu. 2016. Contact loss beneath track slab caused by deteriorated cement emulsified asphalt mortar: dynamic characteristics of vehicle-slab track system and prototype experiment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2016:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, and L. Wu. 2021. The Influence of Nonhomogeneous Interlayer Stiffness on Dynamic Response of Orbit-Girder System under Moving Load. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 22:2250004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., T. Xu, L. Jiang, W. Zhou, J. Yu, X. Liu, and Z. Ren. 2022. Investigating the impact of typical bridge transverse dislocations on the running performance of high-speed trains. Journal of Vibration and Control. doi:10.1177/10775463221141597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Jiang, Z. Lai, P. Xiang, and Y. Chen. 2020. Sensitivity and dynamic analysis of train-bridge coupled system with multiple random factors. Engineering Structures 221:111083. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizhong, J., L. Shaohui, Z. Yuntai, Z. Wangbao, F. Yulin, and X. Tianxin. 2022. Dynamic response analysis of girder-orbit systems considering the constraining effect of orbit extension under moving load. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 50 (9):3245–61. doi:10.1080/15397734.2020.1801463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, J., J. Zhang, Q. Feng, and H. Cao. 2017. Influence of emulsified cement asphalt mortar seam on dynamic characteristics of vehicle—China Railway Track System II ballastless track system. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 10 (6):52–61. doi:10.25103/jestr.106.08.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, J., J. Wang, X. Li, K. Wei, H. Li, and S. Deng. 2020. Influence of cement asphalt mortar debonding on the damage distribution and mechanical responses of CRTS I prefabricated slab. Construction and Building Materials 230:116995. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaohui, L., J. Lizhong, Z. Wangbao, Y. Jian, and L. Xiang. 2022. Study on the influence of damage characteristics of longitudinal ballastless track on the dynamic performance of train-track-bridge coupled systems. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 23:23. doi:10.1007/s43452-022-00561-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, H.-P., and Y.-Q. Ni. 2019. An efficient approach for dynamic global sensitivity analysis of stochastic train-track-bridge system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 117:843–61. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., W. Zhai, J. Gao, H. Li, X. Kang, and X. Liu. 2014. PSD of ballastless track irregularities of high-speed railway. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica 44 (7):687–96. doi:10.1360/N092014-00088.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., J. Lizhong, Z. Wangbao, F. Yulin, and L. Xiang. 2022. Study on power spectral density curve of track geometric irregularity under lateral random earthquake. China Civil Engineering Journal 55:61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Zakeri, J. A., M. Shadfar, and M. M. Feizi. 2014. Sensitivity analysis of bridge-track-train system to parameters of railway. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 11 (4):598–612. doi:10.1590/S1679-78252014000400003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakeri, J. A., M. Fattahi, and M. M. Ghanimoghadam. 2015. Influence of unsupported and partially supported sleepers on dynamic responses of train–track interaction. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (6):2289–95. doi:10.1007/s12206-015-0521-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, W. 2020. Numerical method and computer simulation for analysis of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. In Vehicle–Track Coupled Dynamics. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., J. Yu, L. Jiang, Z. Lai, Y. Zuo, and K. Peng. 2022. Component damage and failure sequence of track-bridge system for high-speed railway under seismic action. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 27 (3):656–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar