Study on the seismic influence coefficient of track irregularity on the train dynamic effect of high-speed railway bridge

References

• Baker, J. W., and C. Allin Cornell. 2005. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (10):1193–217. doi:10.1002/eqe.474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., and A. B. Acevedo. 2004. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8 (sup001):43–91. doi:10.1080/13632460409350521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., N. Zhang, L. Jiang, Z. Zeng, G. Chen, and W. Guo. 2014. Near-fault directivity pulse-like ground motion effect on high-speed railway bridge. Journal of Central South University 21 (6):2425–36. doi:10.1007/s11771-014-2196-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., W. Zhai, and Q. Yin. 2018. Analysis of structural stresses of tracks and vehicle dynamic responses in train–track–bridge system with pier settlement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 232 (2):421–34. doi:10.1177/0954409716675001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.-C., and C.-T. Hsu. 2016. Derailment safety analysis for a tilting railway vehicle moving on irregular tracks shaken by an earthquake. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 230 (3):625–42. doi:10.1177/0954409714553255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, G., M. Su, and Y. F. Chen. 2016. Design and construction of simple beam bridges for high-speed rails in China: Standardization and industrialization. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 11 (4):274–82. doi:10.3846/bjrbe.2016.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, C. 2016. Dynamic behavior of a simply supported bridge with a switching crack subjected to seismic excitations and moving trains. Engineering Structures 110:59–69. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., M. Kawatani, T. Hayashikawa, and T. Matsumoto. 2011. Numerical analysis on seismic response of Shinkansen bridge-train interaction system under moderate earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 10 (1):85–97. doi:10.1007/s11803-011-0049-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2006. Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (1):21–38. doi:10.1002/eqe.529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., K. Peng, J. Yu, W. Zhou, and Y. Zuo. 2022. The influence of trains on the seismic response of simply-supported beam bridges with different pier heights expressed through an impact factor. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (5):2795–814. doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01343-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Z., B. Huang, J. Ren, and S. Pei. 2018. Reduction of vehicle-induced vibration of railway bridges due to distribution of axle loads through track. Shock and Vibration 2018:1–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, S. H. 2013. Improvement of bridge structures to increase the safety of moving trains during earthquakes. Engineering Structures 56:501–8. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., X. B. Liu, H. Y. Li, F. Yang, J. M. Gao, and W. M. Zhai. 2014. Ballastless track turbulence spectrum of high-speed railway. Science China: Technical Sciences 44 (07):687–96.
   Google Scholar
• Katsanos, E. I., A. G. Sextos, and G. D. Manolis. 2010. Selection of earthquake ground motion records A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30 (4):157–69. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurama, Y. C., and K. T. Farrow. 2003. Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32 (15):2425–50. doi:10.1002/eqe.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Z., L. Jiang, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, and W. Zhou. 2021. Analytical investigation on the geometry of longitudinal continuous track in high-speed rail corresponding to lateral bridge deformation. 268:121064.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Z., X. Kang, L. Jiang, W. Zhou, Y. Feng, Y. Zhang, J. Yu, and L. Nie. 2020. Earthquake influence on the rail irregularity on high-speed railway bridge. Shock and Vibration 2020:1–16. doi:10.1155/2020/4315304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, X. Liu, and Y. Feng. 2022a. An analytical solution for the geometry of high-speed railway CRTS III slab ballastless track. Mathematics 10 (18):3306. doi:10.3390/math10183306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Jiang, P. Xiang, Y. Feng, Z. Lai, and W. Zhou. 2022b. Running safety of high-speed railway train on bridge during earthquake considering uncertainty parameters of bridge. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 22 (10):2241008. doi:10.1142/S0219455422410085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Jiang, P. Xiang, Z. Lai, Y. Feng, and S. Cao. 2021. Dynamic response limit of high-speed railway bridge under earthquake considering running safety performance of train. Journal of Central South University 28 (3):968–80. doi:10.1007/s11771-021-4657-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, K., and B. Stojadinović. 2001. Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 6 (6):468–81. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468).
   Google Scholar
• Naeimi, M., J. Ali Zakeri, M. Shadfar, and M. Esmaeili. 2015. 3D dynamic model of the railway wagon to obtain the wheel–rail forces under track irregularities. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 229 (4):357–69. doi:10.1177/1464419314566833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo, J., and J. Ambrósio. 2012. An alternative method to include track irregularities in railway vehicle dynamic analyses. Nonlinear Dynamics 68 (1–2):161–76. doi:10.1007/s11071-011-0212-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali, N. M., and Y. B. Wah. 2011. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2 (1): 21–33
   Google Scholar
• Shome, N., and C. A. Cornell. 1998. Normalization and scaling accelerograms for nonlinear structural analysis. Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1–12. Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 14 (3):469–500. doi:10.1193/1.1586011.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., S.-J. Chiou, J. D. Bray, R. W. Graves, P. G. Somerville, and N. A. Abrahamson. 2002. Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 (9–12):765–72. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00097-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., G. Ding, H. Tang, and L. K. Chen. 2011. Numerical seismic analysis of simply-supported girder railway bridge under high-speed train load. Applied Mechanics and Materials 80-81:566–70. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.80-81.566.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and W. Zhai. 2017. Stochastic analysis model for vehicle-track coupled systems subject to earthquakes and track random irregularities. Journal of Sound and Vibration 407:209–25. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2017.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., H. Wang, and X. Jin. 2016. Numerical analysis of a train-bridge system subjected to earthquake and running safety evaluation of moving train. Shock and Vibration 2016:1–15. doi:10.1155/2016/9027054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., S. Gu, S. Zhou, J. Yang, Y. Zhou, and S. Lian. 2015. Effect of track irregularity on the dynamic response of a slab track under a high-speed train based on the composite track element method. Applied Acoustics 99:72–84. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-B., and Y.-S. Wu. 2002. Dynamic stability of trains moving over bridges shaken by earthquakes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 258 (1):65–94. doi:10.1006/jsvi.2002.5089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, X. Liu, Z. Lai, and Y. Feng. 2022. Study on the dynamic response correction factor of a coupled high-speed train–track–bridge system under near-fault earthquakes. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 50 (9):3303–21. doi:10.1080/15397734.2020.1803753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yau, J. D. 2009. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 325 (4–5):907–22. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, J. Lu, T. Zhong, and K. Peng. 2021. Study on the influence of trains on the seismic response of high-speed railway structure under lateral uncertain earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (7):2971–92. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01085-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakeri, J. A., M. Shadfar, and M. M. Feizi. 2014. Sensitivity analysis of bridge-track-train system to parameters of railway. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 11 (4):598–612. scielo. doi:10.1590/S1679-78252014000400003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zboiński, K. 1998. Dynamical investigation of railway vehicles on a curved track. European Journal of Mechanics – A/Solids 17 (6):1001–20. doi:10.1016/S0997-7538(98)90506-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2018. Vehicle–bridge interaction analysis modeling derailment during earthquakes. Nonlinear Dynamics 93 (4):2315–37. doi:10.1007/s11071-018-4327-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, W., and X. Sun. 1994. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track. Vehicle System Dynamics 23 (supp 1):603–15. doi:10.1080/00423119308969544.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, W., H. Xia, C. Cai, M. Gao, X. Li, X. Guo, N. Zhang, and K. Wang. 2013. High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions – Part I: Theoretical model and numerical simulation. International Journal of Rail Transportation 1 (1–2):3–24. doi:10.1080/23248378.2013.791498.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, W., Z. Han, Z. Chen, L. Ling, and S. Zhu. 2019. Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: A state-of-the-art review. Vehicle System Dynamics 57 (7):984–1027. doi:10.1080/00423114.2019.1605085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. C., J. H. Lin, Y. H. Zhang, Y. Zhao, W. P. Howson, and F. W. Williams. 2010. Non-stationary random vibration analysis for train–bridge systems subjected to horizontal earthquakes. Engineering Structures 32 (11):3571–82. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar