Topology and material optimization of an underactuated robot for gait rehabilitation

References

• Al-Hayali, N. K., J. S. Chiad, S. M. Nacy, and O. Hussein. 2021. A review of passive and quasi-passive lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments 44:428–39.
   Google Scholar
• Arunkumar, S., S. Mahesh, M. Rahul, N. Ganesh, and K. Maheshwaran. 2023. Design and analysis of lower limb exoskeleton with external payload. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 17 (4):2055–72. doi: 10.1007/s12008-023-01272-1.
   Google Scholar
• Atmaja, R., M. Munadi, and M. Tauviqirrahman. 2017. Stress analysis of lower limb exoskeleton for walking assistance using finite element method. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research (IJAER) 12:3864–3866.
   Google Scholar
• Batkuldinova, K., A. Abilgaziyev, E. Shehab, and M. H Ali. 2021. The recent development of 3D printing in developing lower-leg exoskeleton: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 42:1822–1828.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, K., C. D. Bellicoso, and M. Hutter. 2016. ANYpulator: Design and control of a safe robotic arm. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2016.7759189.
   Google Scholar
• Bottin, M., and G. Rosati. 2022. Comparison of under-actuated and fully actuated serial robotic arms: a case study. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 14 (3):034503. doi: 10.1115/1.4053046.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, J. D., and A. S. John. 1985. ANSYS engineering analysis system user’s manual. Houston, Pa: Swanson Analysis Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Capitani, S. L., M. Bianchi, N. Secciani, M. Pagliai, E. Meli, and A. Ridolfi. 2021. Model-based mechanical design of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton for assisting workers in shotcrete projection. Meccanica 56 (1):195–210. doi: 10.1007/s11012-020-01282-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., C.-H. Zhong, X. Zhao, H. Ma, X. Guan, X. Li, F.-Y. Liang, J. C. Y. Cheng, L. Qin, S.-W. Law, et al. 2017. A wearable exoskeleton suit for motion assistance to paralysed patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 11:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2017.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaradia, D., M. Xiloyannis, M. Solazzi, L. Masia, and A. Frisoli. 2018. Comparison of a soft exosuit and a rigid exoskeleton in an assistive task. International Symposium on Wearable Robotics, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ciocarlie, M., and P. Allen. 2010. Data-driven optimization for underactuated robotic hands. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Coello, C. C., A. D. Christiansen, and A. H. Aguirre. 1995. Multiobjective design optimization of counterweight balancing of a robot arm using genetic algorithms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, IEEE. doi: 10.1109/TAI.1995.479374.
   Google Scholar
• Collo, A., V. Bonnet, and G. Venture. 2016. A quasi-passive lower limb exoskeleton for partial body weight support. Paper presented at the 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), IEEE. doi: 10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523698.
   Google Scholar
• Dadi, V. V., P. Sathwik, D. Mahesh, D. Jaswanth, S. K. Kumar, M. Ramya, and D. Dinakaran. 2020. Structural design and analysis of a lower limb exoskeleton for elderly. International Journal of Advanced Mechatronic Systems 8 (2/3):65–74. doi: 10.1504/IJAMECHS.2020.111302.
   Google Scholar
• Darwich, A., H. Nazha, A. Sliman, and W. Abbas. 2020. Ankle–foot orthosis design between the tradition and the computerized perspectives. International Journal of Artificial Organs 43 (5):354–61. doi: 10.1177/0391398819890348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, H., D. Patzer, and S. S. Galen. 2019. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: Promises, pitfalls, and opportunities. Disability and Rehabilitation 41 (5):560–3. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1398786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, M., Z. Wang, S. Li, J. Li, Z. Pang, S. Liu, and Z. Duan. 2021. Design and optimization of exoskeleton structure of lower limb knee joint based on cross four-bar linkage. AIP Advances 11 (6):065124. doi: 10.1063/5.0053899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gätz, R., M. Uebersax, and O. König. 2000. Structural optimization tool using genetic algorithms and Ansys. Paper presented at the Proceeding of 18 CAD-FEM User’s Meeting, Internationale FEM-Technologietage, Graf-Zeppelin-Haus, Friedrichshafen.
   Google Scholar
• Ghafarian, M., B. Shirinzadeh, A. Al-Jodah, T. K. Das, and J. Pinskier. 2020. FEA-based optimization of a complete structure of a monolithic z/tip/tilt micromanipulator. Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics 16 (1):93–110. doi: 10.1007/s12213-020-00133-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., N. Robson, and J. McCarthy. 2017. Design of wearable lower leg orthotic based on six-bar linkage. Paper presented at the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi: 10.1115/DETC2017-67837.
   Google Scholar
• He, B., S. Wang, and Y. Liu. 2019. Underactuated robotics: A review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 16 (4):172988141986216. doi: 10.1177/1729881419862164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., J. Liu, F. Li, W. Cao, and X. Wu. 2022. Design and analysis of a lightweight lower extremity exoskeleton with novel compliant ankle joints. Technology and Health Care: Official Journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine 30 (4):881–94. doi: 10.3233/THC-213177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, J. H., S. S. Cruz, R. López-Gutiérrez, A. González-Mendoza, and R. Lozano. 2020. Robust nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode control for sit-to-stand task using a mobile lower limb exoskeleton. Control Engineering Practice 101:104496. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, F., R. Goecke, and M. Mohammadian. 2021. Exoskeleton robots for lower limb assistance: A review of materials, actuation, and manufacturing methods. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine 235 (12):1375–85. doi: 10.1177/09544119211032010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapsalyamov, A., S. Hussain, N. A. T. Brown, R. Goecke, M. Hayat, and P. K. Jamwal. 2023. Synthesis of a six-bar mechanism for generating knee and ankle motion trajectories using deep generative neural network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 117:105500. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-Y., and B.-K. Cho. 2019. Development of a lower limb exoskeleton worn on the front of a human. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 96 (1):49–64. doi: 10.1007/s10846-018-00979-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschowski, B., J. McPhee, and J. Andrysek. 2019. Lower-limb prostheses and exoskeletons with energy regeneration: Mechatronic design and optimization review. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 11 (4):040801. doi: 10.1115/1.4043460.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., X. Guan, X. Han, Z. Tang, K. Meng, Z. Shi, B. Penzlin, Y. Yang, J. Ren, Z. Yang, et al. 2020. Design and preliminary validation of a lower limb exoskeleton with compact and modular actuation. IEEE Access 8:66338–52. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., K. Zhao, L. Zhang, X. Wu, T. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Li, and C.-Y. Su. 2021. Human-in-the-loop control of a wearable lower limb exoskeleton for stable dynamic walking. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 26 (5):2700–11. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.3044289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., L. Sha, K. Huang, W. Zhang, and H. Yang. 2022. A topology optimization method for collaborative robot lightweight design based on orthogonal experiment and its applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 19 (1):172988142110561. doi: 10.1177/17298814211056143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., W. M. Cheng, and L. He. 2012. Finite element analysis of portable exoskeleton based on ergonomics parameters model. Applied Mechanics and Materials 215–216:168–73. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.215-216.168.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, P., S. Galle, and D. De Clercq. 2017. Fast exoskeleton optimization. Science (New York, N.Y.) 356 (6344):1230–1. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavian, S. A. A., M. Nabipour, F. Absalan, and V. Akbari. 2021. RoboWalk: Augmented human-robot mathematical modelling for design optimization. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 27 (1):373–404. doi: 10.1080/13873954.2021.1879874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, J., and S. Kumar Dwivedy. 2021. Preliminary design and development of a low-cost lower-limb exoskeleton system for paediatric rehabilitation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine 235 (5):530–45. doi: 10.1177/0954411921994940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, J., W. Wang, and G. Chao. 2011. Finite-element analysis of robotic fish shell based on Solidworks and Ansys. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science).
   Google Scholar
• Petuya, V., E. Macho, O. Altuzarra, C. Pinto, and A. Hernandez. 2014. Educational software tools for the kinematic analysis of mechanisms. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 22 (1):72–86. doi: 10.1002/cae.20532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Fernández, A., J. Lobo-Prat, and J. M. Font-Llagunes. 2021. Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait training in neuromuscular impairments. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 18 (1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00815-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupal, B. S., S. Rafique, A. Singla, E. Singla, M. Isaksson, and G. S. Virk. 2017. Lower-limb exoskeletons: Research trends and regulatory guidelines in medical and non-medical applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 14 (6):172988141774355. doi: 10.1177/1729881417743554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccares, L., I. Sarakoglou, and N. G. Tsagarakis. 2016. It-knee: An exoskeleton with ideal torque transmission interface for ergonomic power augmentation. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Villamañan, M. D. C., J. Gonzalez-Vargas, D. Torricelli, J. C. Moreno, and J. L. Pons. 2019. Compliant lower limb exoskeletons: A comprehensive review on mechanical design principles. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 16 (1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0517-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarac, M., M. Solazzi, E. Sotgiu, M. Bergamasco, and A. Frisoli. 2017. Design and kinematic optimization of a novel underactuated robotic hand exoskeleton. Meccanica 52 (3):749–61. doi: 10.1007/s11012-016-0530-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarajchi, M., M. K. Al-Hares, and K. Sirlantzis. 2021. Wearable lower-limb exoskeleton for children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review of mechanical design, actuation type, control strategy, and clinical evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 29:2695–720. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3136088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, L., A. Lin, X. Zhao, and S. Kuang. 2020. A topology optimization method of robot lightweight design based on the finite element model of assembly and its applications. Science Progress 103 (3):36850420936482. doi: 10.1177/0036850420936482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahar, F. S., M. T. H. Sultan, S. H. Lee, M. Jawaid, A. U. M. Shah, S. N. A. Safri, and P. N. Sivasankaran. 2019. A review on the orthotics and prosthetics and the potential of kenaf composites as alternative materials for ankle-foot orthosis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 99:169–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahid, T., D. Gouwanda, S. G. Nurzaman, and A. A. Gopalai. 2018. Moving toward soft robotics: A decade review of the design of hand exoskeletons. Biomimetics 3 (3):17. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics3030017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, Z., A. P. Abdul Majeed, A. F. Zainal Abidin, M. A. Hashem Ali, I. M. Khairuddin, A. Deboucha, and M. Y. Wong Paul Tze. 2018. A hybrid active force control of a lower limb exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering 63 (4):491–500. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2016-0039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D., and J.-H. Dirks. 2012. Shape optimization in exoskeletons and endoskeletons: A biomechanics analysis. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 9 (77):3480–9. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., Y. Liu, J. Chen, B. Guo, and S. Prasad. 2021. Finite element analysis of a self-propelled capsule robot moving in the small intestine. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 206:106621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuge, B. Y., and J. M. McCarthy. 2015. Synthesis of a 10-bar linkage to guide the gait cycle of the human leg. Paper presented at the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi: 10.1115/DETC2015-47723.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M. R., C. Shirota, O. Lambercy, J. S. Sulzer, and R. Gassert. 2017. Design and characterization of an exoskeleton for perturbing the knee during gait. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 64 (10):2331–43. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2656130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umesh, K., and R. Vidhyapriya. 2021. Finite element analysis of lower limb exoskeleton during sit-to-stand transition. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 24 (13):1419–25. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1892658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vélez-Guerrero, M., M. Callejas-Cuervo, J. Álvarez, S. Mazzoleni, A. M. López, D. Álvarez, and L. González. 2022. Protocol proposal for the mechanical evaluation of a soft robotic exoskeleton using an optical motion capture system. Paper presented at the 2022 Global Medical Engineering Physics Exchanges/Pan American Health Care Exchanges (GMEPE/PAHCE), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Fei, and W. Chen. 2020. Integration, sensing, and control of a modular soft-rigid pneumatic lower limb exoskeleton. Soft Robotics 7 (2):140–54. doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Pang, X. Chang, W. Chen, and J. Zhang. 2019. Mechanical design and optimization on lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation. Paper presented at the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICIEA.2019.8833906.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., B. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Liu, Y. Han, S. Wang, J. P. Ferreira, W. Dong, and X. Zhang. 2022. A review on the rehabilitation exoskeletons for the lower limbs of the elderly and the disabled. Electronics 11 (3):388. doi: 10.3390/electronics11030388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Y. Liu, P. Ren, J. Zhang, and J. Liu. 2018. The characteristics of human-robot coadaptation during human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton control. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ROBIO.2018.8665057.
   Google Scholar
• Wicaksono, R. A., S. D. Hariyanto, P. Prihandoko, G. S. Prihandana, and T. Sriani. 2016. Design and analysis of exoskeleton as a rehabilitation device. Applied Mechanics and Materials 842:423–9. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.842.423.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., B. Han, Z. Du, T. Huang, O. Bai, and A. Peng. 2021. Development and testing of a wearable passive lower-limb support exoskeleton to support industrial workers. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 41 (1):221–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., X. Wang, Z. Zhu, R. Xi, and Q. Wu. 2019. Development and control of a robotic lower limb exoskeleton for paraplegic patients. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 233 (3):1087–98. doi: 10.1177/0954406218761484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Y. Chu, X. Xu, H. Huang, D. Zhu, S. Yan, and H. Ding. 2021. Prediction and analysis of material removal characteristics for robotic belt grinding based on single spherical abrasive grain model. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 190:106005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, Y. L., W. Toh, A. Giam, F. R. Yong, K. I. Chan, J. W. S. Tay, S. S. Teong, R. Lin, and T. Y. Ng. 2023. Topology optimization and 3D printing of micro-drone: Numerical design with experimental testing. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 237:107771. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. Y., and G. D. Goh. 2020. 3D printing of carbon fiber composite: The future of composite industry? Matter 2 (6):1361–3. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., H. Lee, W. Kim, and C. Han. 2016. Development of an underactuated exoskeleton for effective walking and load-carrying assist. Advanced Robotics 30 (8):535–51. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2015.1135080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., P. Fiers, K. A. Witte, R. W. Jackson, K. L. Poggensee, C. G. Atkeson, and S. H. Collins. 2017. Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking. Science (New York, N.Y.) 356 (6344):1280–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aal5054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar