The Relationships Among Firm Size, Innovation Type, and Export Performance With Regard to Time Spans

References

• Abernathy, W. J., and J. M. Utterback. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80, no. 7: 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A., and P. M. Swiercz. 1991. Firm size and export behavior: Lessons from the Midwest. Journal of Small Business Management 29, no. 2: 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., and D. W. Greening. 1998. Small business growth through geographic expansion: A comparative case study. Journal of Business Venturing 13, no. 6: 467–92. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00038-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boynton, A. C., B. Victor, and B. J. Pine. 1993. New competitive strategies: Challenges to organizations and information technology. IBM Systems Journal 32, no. 1: 40–64. doi:10.1147/sj.321.0040.
   Google Scholar
• Braunerhjelm, P. 1996. The relation between firm-specific intangibles and exports. Economics Letters 53, no. 2: 213–19. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00898-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Ortega, C., J. M. Benavente, and Á. González. 2014. Innovation, exports, and productivity: Learning and self-selection in chile. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 50, supplement 1:68–95. doi:10.2753/REE1540-496X5001S105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braymen, C., K. Briggs, and J. Boulware. 2011. R&D and the export decision of new firms. Southern Economic Journal 78, no. 1: 191–210. doi:10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, W., A. Glyn, and J. Van Reenen. 2001. Export market performance of OECD countries: An empirical examination of the role of cost competitiveness. The Economic Journal 111, no. 468: 128–62. doi:10.1111/ecoj.2001.111.issue-468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., and M. J. Martin. 2001. Foreign expansion of small firms: The impact of domestic alternatives and prior foreign business involvement. Journal of Business Venturing 16, no. 6: 557–74. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00058-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., and A. K. Crowther. 2006. Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R and D Management 36, no. 3: 229–36. doi:10.1111/radm.2006.36.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and S. Klepper. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal 106, no. 437: 925–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dymsza, W. A. 1984. Global strategic planning: A model and recent developments. Journal of International Business Studies 15, no. 2: 169–83. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gashi, P. S. 2007. Export behaviour and the small and medium enterprise sector in South Eastern Europe, with special reference to Kosovo. Doctoral dissertation, Staffordshire University, United Kingdom
   Google Scholar
• Golovko, E., and G. Valentini. 2011. Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth. Journal of International Business Studies 42, no. 3: 362–80. doi:10.1057/jibs.2011.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1994. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, no. 1: 23–44. doi:10.1257/jep.8.1.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., and Q. C. Li. 2009. Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments. Oxford Economic Papers 61, no. 1: 74–103. doi:10.1093/oep/gpn011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S., and I. Bijaoui. 1985. R&D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121, no. 2: 238–51. doi:10.1007/BF02705822.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. S., H. M. Kim, and H. S. Kim. 2013. Industry openness, firm capacity, and performance of Korean SMEs. Journal of Korea Trade 17, no. 3: 77–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., and N. L. Schwartz. 1975. Market structure and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13, no. 1: 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., and O. Olsson. 1998. Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics 10, no. 1: 31–46. doi:10.1023/A:1007970416484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsikeas, C. S., L. C. Leonidou, and N. A. Morgan. 2000. Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28, no. 4: 493–511. doi:10.1177/0092070300284003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 1996. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. The American Economic Review 86, no. 3: 562–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KOSIS. 2012. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1979. A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. The Journal of Political Economy 87, no. 2: 253–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., and N. S. Siddharthan. 1994. Technology, firm size and export behaviour in developing countries: The case of Indian enterprises. The Journal of Development Studies 31, no. 2: 289–309. doi:10.1080/00220389408422362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachenmaier, S., and L. Wößmann. 2006. Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers 58, no. 2: 317–50. doi:10.1093/oep/gpi043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, É., L. A. Lefebvre, and M. Bourgault. 1998. R&D-related capabilities as determinants of export performance. Small Business Economics 10, no. 4: 365–77. doi:10.1023/A:1007960431147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, L. A., and E. Lefebvre. 1993. Competitive positioning and innovative efforts in SMEs. Small Business Economics 5, no. 4: 297–305. doi:10.1007/BF01516250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, L.-A., E. Lefebvre, and R. Poupart. 1990. The shape of the new winner: Innovativeness and the strategic edge in small firms. National Productivity Review 9, no. 3: 313–20. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6734.
   Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A. 2000. Competencies, innovation and profitability of firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9, no. 1: 1–24. doi:10.1080/10438590000000001.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U. 2008. Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55, no. 1: 148–57. doi:10.1109/TEM.2007.912932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., and J. Freese. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid‐Guijarro, A., D. Garcia, and H. Van Auken. 2009. Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 47, no. 4: 465–88. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2009.47.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majocchi, A., E. Bacchiocchi, and U. Mayrhofer. 2005. Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: A longitudinal approach to complex relationships. International Business Review 14, no. 6: 719–38. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ros, E. 1999. Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: The Spanish case. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 10, no. 2: 223–42. doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(99)00016-4.
   Google Scholar
• Nassimbeni, G. 2001. Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: A logit/ tobit model. Research Policy 30, no. 2: 245–62. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00114-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A. N., N. Quang Pham, C. D. Nguyen, and N. D. Nguyen. 2008. Innovation and exports in Vietnam’s SME sector. The European Journal of Development Research 20, no. 2: 262–80. doi:10.1080/09578810802060801.
   Google Scholar
• Oecd, E. 2005. Oslo Manual. In Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C. H., and A. W. Pearson. 1982. The impact of technical characteristics on export activity: A study of small and medium‐sized UK electronics firms. R&D Management 12, no. 4: 189–96. doi:10.1111/radm.1982.12.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K., M. Robson, and J. Townsend. 1987. The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-1983. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35, no. 3: 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccardo, C., A. Bottasso, and L. Benfratello. 2014. Innovative capacity and export perfor mance: Exploring heterogeneity along the export intensity distribution (No. 371). Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pine II, B. J., and B. Victor. 1993. Making mass customization work. Harvard Business Review 71, no. 5: 108–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. D. 1983. Managerial and firm influences on export behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 11, no. 3: 323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, S., and H. Love. 2002. Innovation and export performance: Evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Research Policy 31, no. 7: 1087–102. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R., and W. Zegveld. 1982. Innovation and the small and medium sized firm. London, UK: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Schmutzler, A., and S. Athey. 1995. Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment. R&D Journal of Economics 26, no. 4: 557–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1961. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsie, J. 2003. The context of dominance: An industry driven framework for exploiting reputation. Strategic Management Journal 24, no. 3: 199–215. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, T. Y., W. Song, M. Um, and J. Lee 2010. Korean innovation survey 2010: Manufacturing sector.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the European Communities 2005. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (No. 4). Paris: Publications de l’OCDE.
   Google Scholar
• Sterlacchini, A. 1999. Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy 28, no. 8: 819–32. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00023-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometric: Journal of the Econometric Society 26, no. 1: 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M., and W. J. Abernathy. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3, no. 6: 639–56. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzagalieva, A., E. Kočenda, and A. Menezes. 2012. Technological innovation in new EU markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 48, no. 5: 48–65. doi:10.2753/REE1540-496X480503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhees, F. J. 2005. Market-oriented product innovation in small firms. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, no. 2: 190–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 1995. Exports, firm size, and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics 7, no. 1: 29–39. doi:10.1007/BF01074314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 1996. Export performance, human capital, and product innovation in Germany: A micro view. Review of Economics 47, no. 1: 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wakelin, K. 1997. Trade and innovation: Theory and evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wakelin, K. 1998. Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy 26 (7–8):829–41. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00051-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, L. S., and F. Wiedersheim-Paul. 1979. Export promotion policy-a new approach. Australian Journal of Management 4, no. 2: 165–77. doi:10.1177/031289627900400207.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and J. G. Covin. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 10, no. 1: 43–58. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar