Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Performance, and Pay-Performance Sensitivity—Evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange Social Responsibility Index

References

• Alexander, G. J., and R. A. Buchholz. 1978. Corporate social performance and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal 21:479–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, I. Hasan, and N. Kobeissi. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value. Journal of Business Research 65:1628–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabou, R., and J. Tirole. 2010. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, E. H., and M. Haire. 1975. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 18:49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragdon, J., and J. Marlin. 1972. Is pollution profitable? Risk Management 19:9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin. 2006. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management 35:97–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagwin, D., and M. J. Bouwman. 2002. The association between activity-based costing and improvement in financial performance. Management Accounting Research 13:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, B., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, I. H., H. Hong, and K. Shue. 2012. Do managers do good with other people’s money? Chicago Booth Paper No. 12-47.
   Google Scholar
• Chih, H. L., C. H. Shen, and F. C. Kang. 2008. Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 79:179–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. B., D. Lee, and Y. Park. 2013. Board Members and Company Value. Corporate Governance: An International Review 21:447–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27:42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, B., and A. C. Shapiro. 1987. Corporate stakeholder and corporate finance. Financial Management 16:5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., and B. Villalonga. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7:209–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. H. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2011. Voluntary non-financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The case of corporate social responsibility. The Accounting Review 86:59–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. H. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2014. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33:328–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87:723–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88:288–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, A., H. Liang, and L. Renneboog. 2015. Socially responsible firms, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)-Finance working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C. J., N. A. Gardberg, and M. L. Barnett. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105:85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13. September.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. 1997. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society 36:221–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoul, E. I., S. O. Guedhami, C. Y. Kwok, and R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35:2388–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss, A., and G. S. Roberts. 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the Cost of Bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance 35:1794–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S., and O. Hart. 1983. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51:7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grougioua, V., S. Leventis, E. Dedoulis, and S. Owusu-Ansahe. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in U.S. banks. Accounting Forum 38:155–69.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. 2002. Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10:74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., and M. L. Andersen. 2011. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):461–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou, I., and G. Serafeim. 2015. The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal 36:1053–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., W. N. Lanen, and D. F. Larcker. 2002. The association between activity-based costing and manufacturing performance. Journal of Accounting Research 40:711–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98:225–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. Market for corporate control: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 1:5–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. C., and T. Kato. 1995. The productivity effects of employee stock ownership plans and bonuses: Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review 85:391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking and Finance 43:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., M. S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 8:761–96.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, H. E., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32:371–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Q., and T. Hachiya. 2005. Corporate governance, cash holdings, and firm value: Evidence from Japan. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 8:613–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, Y. T., and Y. Kusnadi. 2005. Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 13:301–18.
   Google Scholar
• Masulis, R. W., and S. W. Reza. 2015. Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies 28:592–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27:595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26:117–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menz, K.-M. 2010. Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics 96:117–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minor, D. B., and J. Morgan. 2010. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. working Paper,Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation：An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20:293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, M. R. 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1:71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Newgren, K., A. Rasher, M. LaRoe, and M. Szabo. 1985. Environmental assessment and corporate performance: A longitudinal analysis using market-deter-mined performance measures. In Research in corporate social performance and policy, ed. L. E. Preston, Vol. 7, 153–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M., F. Panetta, and L. Zingales. 1998. Why do computers go public? An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance 53:27–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peloza, J. 2006. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review 48:52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and C. Van Der Linde. 1995. Green and competitive. Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review September–October:120–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, L. E., and P. O’ Bannon. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and Society 36:419–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1985a. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity. American Statistician 39:33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1985b. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41:103–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfman, M. P., and C. S. Fernando. 2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal 29:569–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C. H., and Y. Chang. 2009. Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off?-The application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics 88:133–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulz, R. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights, financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20:25–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoutsourz, M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Berkeley, California: Applied Financial Project.
   Google Scholar
• Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40:658–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, S. 1975. Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review 64:18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Waddock, S., and S. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18:303–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, N., and B. Whitehead. 1994. It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review 72:2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M. V., and C. H. Shen. 2013. Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking and Finance 37:3529–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. 2006. Board members and company value. Financial Markets Portfolio Management 20:33–47.
   Google Scholar